Ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence in Australian healthcare and ethical integration in radiography: A narrative review

被引:2
|
作者
Chau, Minh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Fac Sci & Hlth, Level 5,250 Boorooma St, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
[2] Flinders Med Ctr, South Australia Med Imaging, 1 Flinders Dr, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Radiography; Ethics; Regulation; Legal; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; OF-THE-ART; AI; FUTURE; CLASSIFICATION; OPPORTUNITIES; MAMMOGRAMS; CHALLENGES; DIAGNOSIS; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101733
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This narrative review explores the ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of AI integration in Australian healthcare, focusing on radiography. It examines the current legislative framework, assesses the trust and reliability of AI tools, and proposes future directions for ethical AI integration in radiography. AI systems significantly enhance diagnostic radiography by improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in stroke detection, brain imaging, and chest reporting. However, AI raises substantial ethical concerns due to its 'black-box' nature and potential biases in training data. The Therapeutic Goods Administration's reforms in Australia, though comprehensive, fall short of fully addressing issues related to the trustworthiness and legal liabilities of AI tools. Adopting a comprehensive research strategy that includes doctrinal, comparative, and public policy analyses will facilitate an understanding of international practices, particularly from countries with similar legal systems, and help guide Australia in refining its regulatory framework. For an ethical future in radiography, a robust, multi-disciplinary approach is required to prioritize patient safety, data privacy, and equitable AI use. A framework that balances technological innovation with ethical and legal integrity is essential for advancing healthcare while preand AI developers must collaborate to establish a resilient, equitable, multi-disciplinary methodologies, combining doctrinal, comparative, beneficial integration into radiography.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ETHICAL AND LEGAL PROBLEMS RELATED TO SUBJECTIVITY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Slavova, Veselina
    Dimitrova, Darina
    FILOSOFIYA-PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 32 (02): : 186 - 202
  • [32] Ethical and Legal Protection of Artificial Intelligence Damage and Liability
    Divino, Sthefano Bruno Santos
    CADERNOS DE DEREITO ACTUAL, 2023, (22): : 288 - 313
  • [33] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE: LEGAL, ETHICAL AND SOCIAL ASPECTS
    Anishchenko, Mykhailo A.
    Gidenko, Ievgen
    Kaliman, Maksym
    Polyvaniuk, Vasyl
    Demianchuk, Yurii V.
    ACTA BIOETHICA, 2023, 29 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [34] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ARMED CONFLICTS: LEGAL AND ETHICAL LIMITS
    Vigevano, Marta R.
    ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA, 2021, 197 (800)
  • [35] Navigating the ethical and regulatory landscape of AI integration in radiology
    Jia, Yanxia
    Han, Liang
    Dai, Yilong
    Jin, Chengqiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2025, 183
  • [36] The Ethical Landscape of Data and Artificial Intelligence: Citizen Perspectives
    Crockett, Keeley
    Colyer, Edwin
    Latham, Annabel
    2021 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI 2021), 2021,
  • [37] A Governance and Assessment Model for Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
    Briguglio, Luigi
    Morpurgo, Francesca
    Occhipinti, Carmela
    ERCIM NEWS, 2023, (134):
  • [38] Public views on ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence: protocol for a scoping review
    Emma Kellie Frost
    Rebecca Bosward
    Yves Saint James Aquino
    Annette Braunack-Mayer
    Stacy M. Carter
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [39] Public views on ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence: protocol for a scoping review
    Frost, Emma Kellie
    Bosward, Rebecca
    Aquino, Yves Saint James
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette
    Carter, Stacy M.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)