ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
McDonald, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
Scheel, John R. [2 ]
Lewin, Alana A. [3 ]
Weinstein, Susan P. [4 ]
Dodelzon, Katerina [5 ]
Dogan, Basak E. [6 ]
Fitzpatrick, Amy [7 ]
Kuzmiak, Cherie M. [8 ]
Newell, Mary S. [9 ]
Paulis, Lisa V. [10 ]
Pilewskie, Melissa [11 ]
Salkowski, Lonie R. [12 ]
Silva, H. Colleen [13 ]
Sharpe, Richard E., Jr. [14 ]
Specht, Jennifer M. [15 ,16 ]
Ulaner, Gary A. [17 ,18 ,19 ]
Slanetz, Priscilla J. [20 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, 1211 Med Ctr Dr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Weill Cornell Newyork Presbyterian, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[7] Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[8] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[9] Emory Univ Hosp, Atlanta, GA USA
[10] Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, Rochester, NY USA
[11] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[12] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[13] Univ Texas Med Branch, Galveston, TX USA
[14] Mayo Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
[15] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[16] Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Seattle, WA USA
[17] Hoag Family Canc Inst, Newport Beach, CA USA
[18] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[19] Commiss Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Los Angeles, CA USA
[20] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Appropriateness Criteria; appropriate use criteria; AUC; invasive breast cancer; locoregional disease; metastatic disease; recurrence; staging; surveillance; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE-ASPIRATION BIOPSY; NODE-NEGATIVE PATIENTS; AXILLARY LYMPH-NODES; EARLY-STAGE; F-18-FDG PET/CT; TUMOR SIZE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; LOBULAR CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
As the proportion of women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer increases, the role of imaging for staging and surveillance purposes should be determined based on evidence-based guidelines. It is important to understand the indications for extent of disease evaluation and staging, as unnecessary imaging can delay care and even result in adverse outcomes. In asymptomatic patients that received treatment for curative intent, there is no role for imaging to screen for distant recurrence. Routine surveillance with an annual 2-D mammogram and/or tomosynthesis is recommended to detect an in-breast recurrence or a new primary breast cancer in women with a history of breast cancer, and MRI is increasingly used as an additional screening tool in this population, especially in women with dense breasts. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:S168 / S202
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ACR Appropriateness Criteria Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Yee, Judy
    Kim, David H.
    Rosen, Max P.
    Lalani, Tasneem
    Carucci, Laura R.
    Cash, Brooks D.
    Feig, Barry W.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Katz, Douglas S.
    Smith, Martin P.
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (06) : 543 - 551
  • [22] ACR Appropriateness Criteria®  Resectable Rectal Cancer
    William E Jones
    Charles R Thomas
    Joseph M Herman
    May Abdel-Wahab
    Nilofer Azad
    William Blackstock
    Prajnan Das
    Karyn A Goodman
    Theodore S Hong
    Salma K Jabbour
    Andre A Konski
    Albert C Koong
    Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas
    William Small
    Jennifer Zook
    W Warren Suh
    Radiation Oncology, 7
  • [23] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Yee, Judy
    Rosen, Max Paul
    Blake, Michael A.
    Baker, Mark E.
    Cash, Brooks D.
    Fidler, Jeff L.
    Grant, Thomas H.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Jones, Bronwyn
    Katz, Douglas S.
    Lalani, Tasneem
    Miller, Frank H.
    Small, William C.
    Sudakoff, Gary S.
    Warshauer, David M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (09) : 670 - 678
  • [24] ACR appropriateness criteria on resectable rectal cancer
    Suh, W. Warren
    Blackstock, A. William
    Herman, Joseph
    Konski, Andre A.
    Mohiuddin, Mohammed
    Poggi, Matthew M.
    Regine, William F.
    Cosman, Bard C.
    Saltz, Leonard
    Johnstone, Peter A. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (05): : 1427 - 1430
  • [25] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Stomach Cancer
    Daroui, Parima
    Jabbour, Salma K.
    Herman, Joseph M.
    Abdel-Wahab, May
    Azad, Nilofer
    Blackstock, A. William
    Das, Prajnan
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Jones, William E., III
    Kaur, Harmeet
    Konski, Andre A.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Kumar, Rachit
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Small, William, Jr.
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    Suh, W. Warren
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2015, 29 (08): : 595 - 603
  • [26] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Jones, William E., III
    Suh, W. Waren
    Abdel-Wahab, May
    Abrams, Ross A.
    Azad, Nilofer
    Das, Prajnan
    Dragovic, Jadranka
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Jabbour, Salma K.
    Konski, Andre A.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Kumar, Rachit
    Lee, Percy
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Small, William
    Herman, Joseph M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 40 (02): : 109 - 117
  • [27] ACR APPROPRIATENESS CRITERIA® Management of Vaginal Cancer
    Lee, Larissa J.
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Kidd, Elizabeth
    Cardenes, Higinia Rosa
    Elshaikh, Mohamed A.
    Erickson, Beth
    Mayr, Nina A.
    Moore, David
    Puthawala, Ajmel A.
    Rao, Gautam G.
    Small, William, Jr.
    Varia, Mahesh A.
    Wahl, Andrew O.
    Wolfson, Aaron H.
    Yashar, Catheryn M.
    Yuh, William
    Gaffney, David K.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2013, 27 (11): : 1166 - 1173
  • [28] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Rectal Cancer
    Jones, William E., III
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    Herman, Joseph M.
    Abdel-Wahab, May
    Azad, Nilofer
    Blackstock, William
    Das, Prajnan
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Jabbour, Salma K.
    Konski, Andre A.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel
    Small, William, Jr.
    Zook, Jennifer
    Suh, W. Warren
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7
  • [29] ACR Appropriateness Criteria Evaluation of the Symptomatic Male Breast
    Mainiero, Martha B.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    Barke, Lora D.
    Argus, Amy D.
    Bailey, Lisa
    Carkaci, Selin
    D'Orsi, Carl
    Green, Edward D.
    Holley, Susan O.
    Jokich, Peter M.
    Lee, Su-Ju
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Moy, Linda
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    Trikha, Sunita
    Yepes, Monica M.
    Newell, Mary S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (07) : 678 - 682
  • [30] ACR appropriateness Criteria™
    Leibel, SA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (01): : 125 - 168