A manual synchronous low energy shock impedance as a predictor of successful defibrillation testing during subcutaneous ICD implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Calvo, Naiara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lopez-Perales, Carlos Ruben [1 ,2 ]
Oloriz, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Diaz-Cortegana, Francisco [1 ]
Jauregui, Beatriz [1 ,2 ]
Soto, Nina [1 ]
Rodriguez, Pilar [1 ]
Santamaria, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Ortas, M. Rosario [1 ,2 ]
Asso, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Miguel Servet, Cardiol Dept, Arrhytmia Unit, P Isabel La Catolica 1-3, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Aragon Inst Hlth Sci, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Med Psychiat & Dermatol, Zaragoza, Spain
来源
关键词
defibrillation testing; shock impedance; subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator; ventricular fibrillation; CARDIOVERTER; EFFICACY; SAFETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/pace.15055
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Guidelines recommend defibrillation testing (DFT) during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Implant position, patient characteristics and device factors, such as shock impedance, influence defibrillation success. To evaluate the shock impedance, a manual synchronous 10J shock (low energy synchronous shock [LESS]) can be delivered, without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF). Objective: To compare LESS and DFT impedance values and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LESS impedance for predicting a successful DFT during S-ICD implantation. Methods: Consecutive S-ICD implantations were included. Shock impedances were compared by paired t-tests. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with successful DFT. A prediction model of successful DFT based on LESS impedance was assessed by logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of LESS impedance. Results: Sixty patients were included (52 +/- 14 years; 69% male). LESS and DFT impedance values were highly correlated (r(2) = 0.97, p < .01). Patients with a failed first shock had higher body mass index (BMI) (30 +/- 3 vs. 25.7 +/- 4.3, p = .014), higher mean LESS (120 +/- 35 ohm vs. 86. +/- 23 ohm, p = .0013) and DFT impedance (122 +/- 33 ohm vs. 87 +/- 24 ohm, p = .0013). ROC analysis showed that LESS impedance had a good diagnostic performance in predicting a successful conversion test (AUC 84% [95% CI: 0.72-0.92]) with a cutoff value of <94 ohm to identify a successful DFT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 73%). Conclusion: LESS impedance values without the need to induce VF can intraoperatively predict a successful DFT.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1191
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Incidence of very high defibrillation thresholds (DFT) and efficacy of subcutaneous (SQ) array insertion during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation
    Verma, Atul
    Kaplan, Alexander J.
    Sarak, Bradley
    Oosthuizen, Richard
    Beardsall, Marianne
    Higgenbottam, Jan
    Wulffhart, Zaev
    Khaykin, Yaariv
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 29 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [22] Editorial to "Can lead damage be ruled out using defibrillation threshold testing in patients with very high-impedance shock leads?" Beyond the numbers: Reconsidering high shock impedance in ICD leads with DFT testing
    Enomoto, Yoshinari
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2025, 41 (02)
  • [23] Direction of signal recording affects amplitude based measures of ventricular fibrillation in humans undergoing defibrillation testing during ICD implantation
    Indik, Julia H.
    Donnerstein, Richard L.
    Ott, Peter
    Kern, Karl B.
    Berg, Robert A.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 924 - 924
  • [24] Low energy evaluation of shock impedance in ICD devices by new HVLIC algorithm. Accuracy of the results
    Mueller, C. P.
    Wonhoefer, A.
    Schrage, M. O.
    Maagh, P.
    Meissner, A.
    Perings, C.
    Trappe, H. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 462 - 462
  • [25] IMPORTANCE OF ELECTRODE DESIGN, LEAD CONFIGURATION AND IMPEDANCE FOR SUCCESSFUL LOW-ENERGY TRANSCATHETER ATRIAL DEFIBRILLATION IN DOGS
    KALMAN, JM
    POWER, JM
    CHEN, JM
    FARISH, SJ
    TONKIN, AM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (04) : 1199 - 1206
  • [26] DEFIBRILLATION TESTING DURING ICD IMPLANTATION IN ITALIAN CURRENT PRACTICE: THE "ALIVE" PROJECT (ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM INDUCTION CLINICAL VALUE)
    Bianchi, S.
    Ricci, R. P.
    Gasparini, M.
    Lunati, M.
    Marconi, R.
    Landolina, M.
    Rossi, P.
    Proclemer, A.
    Botto, G. L.
    Merico, M.
    Canonaco, S.
    Santini, M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 22 : S64 - S65
  • [27] Propofol dose and efficacy of defibrillation testing during implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A retrospective, single center cohort study
    Trolese, Luca
    Dall'Aglio, Pietro Bernardo
    Steinfurt, Johannes
    Gressler, Alexander
    Faber, Thomas
    Cipriani, Alberto
    Migliore, Federico
    Westermann, Dirk
    Hilgendorf, Ingo
    Jaeckel, Markus
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (02) : 420 - 428
  • [28] Absence of shock therapy related to improper sensing of noise on the defibrillation test during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a case report
    Tamura, Shota
    Yoshiyama, Tomotaka
    Doi, Atsushi
    Yoshiyama, Minoru
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2020, 4 (06)
  • [29] Leakage of energy to the body surface during defibrillation shock by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TCD) system - Experimental evaluation during defibrillation shocks through the right ventricular lead and the subcutaneous active-can in canines
    Niwano, S
    Kitano, Y
    Moriguchi, M
    Yoshizawa, N
    Kashiwa, T
    Suyama, M
    Toyoshima, T
    Izumi, T
    JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 2001, 65 (03): : 219 - 225
  • [30] Post-shock ECG rhythm classification following out-of-hospital low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic and high-energy monophasic defibrillation shocks
    Gliner, BE
    White, RD
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 173 - 174