A manual synchronous low energy shock impedance as a predictor of successful defibrillation testing during subcutaneous ICD implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Calvo, Naiara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lopez-Perales, Carlos Ruben [1 ,2 ]
Oloriz, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Diaz-Cortegana, Francisco [1 ]
Jauregui, Beatriz [1 ,2 ]
Soto, Nina [1 ]
Rodriguez, Pilar [1 ]
Santamaria, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Ortas, M. Rosario [1 ,2 ]
Asso, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Miguel Servet, Cardiol Dept, Arrhytmia Unit, P Isabel La Catolica 1-3, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Aragon Inst Hlth Sci, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Med Psychiat & Dermatol, Zaragoza, Spain
来源
关键词
defibrillation testing; shock impedance; subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator; ventricular fibrillation; CARDIOVERTER; EFFICACY; SAFETY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/pace.15055
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Guidelines recommend defibrillation testing (DFT) during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Implant position, patient characteristics and device factors, such as shock impedance, influence defibrillation success. To evaluate the shock impedance, a manual synchronous 10J shock (low energy synchronous shock [LESS]) can be delivered, without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF). Objective: To compare LESS and DFT impedance values and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LESS impedance for predicting a successful DFT during S-ICD implantation. Methods: Consecutive S-ICD implantations were included. Shock impedances were compared by paired t-tests. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with successful DFT. A prediction model of successful DFT based on LESS impedance was assessed by logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of LESS impedance. Results: Sixty patients were included (52 +/- 14 years; 69% male). LESS and DFT impedance values were highly correlated (r(2) = 0.97, p < .01). Patients with a failed first shock had higher body mass index (BMI) (30 +/- 3 vs. 25.7 +/- 4.3, p = .014), higher mean LESS (120 +/- 35 ohm vs. 86. +/- 23 ohm, p = .0013) and DFT impedance (122 +/- 33 ohm vs. 87 +/- 24 ohm, p = .0013). ROC analysis showed that LESS impedance had a good diagnostic performance in predicting a successful conversion test (AUC 84% [95% CI: 0.72-0.92]) with a cutoff value of <94 ohm to identify a successful DFT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 73%). Conclusion: LESS impedance values without the need to induce VF can intraoperatively predict a successful DFT.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1191
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Predictors of Impedance During Subcutaneous ICD Defibrillation Testing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
    Narayanan, Chockalingam A.
    Shrestha, Srijan
    Gionfriddo, William
    Koethe, Benjamin
    Katcher, Benjamin
    Garlitski, Ann
    Weinstock, Jonathan
    Homoud, Munther
    Maron, Barry
    Maron, Martin S.
    Rowin, Ethan J.
    Madias, Christopher
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [2] Routine defibrillation testing during ICD implantation
    AL-Atia, B.
    Vandenberk, B.
    Voros, G.
    Garweg, C.
    Ector, J.
    Willems, R.
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (05) : 575 - 575
  • [3] Progression of relatively low shock impedance associated with tumescent local anesthesia during subcutaneous ICD implantation
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Moreno, Fernando
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Miranda-Arboleda, Andres F.
    Rodriguez, Joan
    Gabr, Mohamed
    Alviz, Isabella
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (09) : 1749 - 1751
  • [4] Defibrillation testing is not required during routine ICD implantation
    Kutyifa, Valentina
    Moss, Arthur J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (37) : 2508 - 2509
  • [5] Defibrillation Testing Strategies of Pediatric and Adult Congenital Electrophysiologists during ICD Implantation
    Baysa, Sherrie Joy A.
    Olen, Melissa
    Kanter, Ronald J.
    Fishberger, Steven B.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (08): : 843 - 847
  • [6] The top 10 reasons to avoid defibrillation threshold testing during ICD implantation
    Viskin, Sami
    Rosso, Raphaet
    HEART RHYTHM, 2008, 5 (03) : 391 - 393
  • [7] Relationship of Shock Energy to Impedance During Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Testing
    Payne, Joshua E.
    Badertscher, Patrick
    Field, Michael E.
    Sturdivant, J. Lacy
    Gold, Michael R.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 13 (09):
  • [8] A 10 J shock impedance in sinus rhythm correlates with a 65 J defibrillation impedance during subcutaneous defibrillator implantation using an intermuscular technique
    Okabe, Toshimasa
    Savona, Salvatore J.
    Matto, Faisal
    Ward, Chad
    Singh, Prabhpreet
    Afzal, Muhammad R.
    Kalbfleisch, Steven J.
    Weiss, Raul
    Houmsse, Mahmoud
    Augostini, Ralph S.
    Hummel, John D.
    Daoud, Emile G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (11) : 3027 - 3034
  • [9] Safe and effective use of conscious sedation for defibrillation threshold testing during ICD implantation
    Al Fagih, Ahmed
    Al Shurafa, Hitham
    Al Ghamdi, Saleh
    Dagriri, Khaled
    Al Khadra, Ayman
    JOURNAL OF THE SAUDI HEART ASSOCIATION, 2010, 22 (04) : 209 - 213
  • [10] INCREASED SHOCK IMPEDANCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH FAILED SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD TESTING
    Saltzman, Heath E.
    Angel, Brett
    Overcash, Jay
    Kutalek, Steven
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 351 - 351