Pharmacokinetics and safety of daptomycin administered subcutaneously in healthy volunteers: a single-blinded randomized crossover trial

被引:0
|
作者
Maurille, Charles [1 ]
Baldolli, Aurelie [1 ]
Creveuil, Christian [2 ]
Parienti, Jean-Jacques [1 ,3 ]
Michon, Jocelyn [1 ]
Peyro-Saint-Paul, Laure [2 ]
Brucato, Sylvie [2 ,3 ]
Dargere, Sylvie [1 ]
Comets, Emmanuelle [4 ]
Verdier, Marie-Clemence [5 ]
Verdon, Renaud [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Normandie Univ, Dept Infect Dis, UNICAEN, CHU Caen Normandie, F-14000 Caen, France
[2] Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU Caen Normandie, Dept Biostat & Clin Res, F-14000 Caen, France
[3] Normandie Univ, INSERM, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN,UMR 1311,DYNAMICURE, F-14000 Caen, France
[4] Univ Rennes 1, INSERM, CIC 1414, Rennes, France
[5] Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, UMR S 1085,Irset Inst Rech Sante Environm & Travai, F-35000 Rennes, France
关键词
STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; ANTIBIOTICS; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkae324
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Daptomycin stands as a key IV antibiotic in treating MRSA infections. However, patients facing challenges with difficult venous access require alternative administration routes. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and safety of subcutaneous (SC) daptomycin. Patients and methods: In a two-period, two-treatment, single-blind crossover Phase I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04434300), participants with no medical history received daptomycin (10 mg/kg) both IV and SC in a random order, with a minimum 2 week washout period together with matched placebo (NaCl 0.9%). Blood samples collected over 24 h facilitated PK comparison. Monte Carlo simulations assessed the PTA for various dosing regimens. Adverse events were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) v5.0. Results: Twelve participants (aged 30.9 +/- 24.4 years; 9 male,75%) were included. SC daptomycin exhibited delayed (median T-max 0.5 h for IV versus 4 h for SC) and lower peak concentration than IV (C-max = 132.2 +/- 16.0 mu g/mL for IV versus 57.3 +/- 8.6 mu g/mL for SC; P < 0.001). SC AUC(0-24) (937.3 +/- 102.5 mu g<middle dot>h/mL) was significantly lower (P = 0.005) than IV AUC0-24 (1056.3 +/- 123.5 mu g<middle dot>h/mL) but was deemed bioequivalent. PTA demonstrated target AUC(0-24) attainment for 100% of simulated individuals, for both 8 and 10 mg/kg/24 h SC regimens. Adverse events (AEs) related to SC daptomycin were more frequent than for SC placebo (25 versus 13, P = 0.016). No serious AEs were reported. Conclusions: Single-dose SC daptomycin infusion proved to be safe, exhibiting a bioequivalent AUC0-24 compared with the IV route. The SC route emerges as a potential and effective alternative when IV administration is not possible.
引用
收藏
页码:3016 / 3022
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety of the Single Oral Administration of AGSAV301 vs Exforge: A Randomized Crossover Study of Healthy Male Volunteers
    Hee Youn Choi
    Yo Han Kim
    Mi Jo Kim
    Yook-Hwan Noh
    Shi Hyang Lee
    Kyun-Seop Bae
    Hyeong-Seok Lim
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2014, 14 : 63 - 72
  • [32] Open versus Endoscopic Septoplasty: A Single-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Paradis, Josee
    Rotenberg, Brian W.
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 40 : S28 - S33
  • [33] Mesenteric traction syndrome in pigs: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Rune B.Strandby
    Jens T.F.Osterkamp
    Rikard Ambrus
    Amelie Henriksen
    Jens P.Goetze
    Niels H.Secher
    Michael P.Achiam
    Lars-Bo Svendsen
    Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2021, 4 (02) : 162 - 168
  • [34] Prospective randomized single-blinded trial of endoscopic stenting for chronic pancreatitis
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 6 (05) : 464 - 464
  • [35] Pharmacokinetics in plasma and alveolar regions of healthy calves subcutaneously administered a single dose of enrofloxacin
    Kuramae, Tetsuro
    Otomaru, Konosuke
    Hirata, Masaya
    Ishikawa, Shingo
    Noguchi, Michiko
    Ikedo, Tomonobu
    Horinouchi, Chie
    Hayashi, Jun
    Tsumagari, Keita
    Hobo, Seiji
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 82 (08): : 1197 - 1203
  • [36] Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Stapedotomy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Control Trial
    Fan, Caleb J.
    Kaul, Vivian F.
    Mavrommatis, Maria A.
    Schwam, Zachary G.
    Hu, Shirley
    Kong, Derek K.
    Phan, Noel M.
    Villavisanis, Dillan F.
    Cosetti, Maura K.
    Wanna, George B.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (10) : 1460 - 1466
  • [37] Mesenteric traction syndrome in pigs: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Strandby, Rune B.
    Osterkamp, Jens T. F.
    Ambrus, Rikard
    Henriksen, Amelie
    Goetze, Jens P.
    Secher, Niels H.
    Achiam, Michael P.
    Svendsen, Lars-Bo
    ANIMAL MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (02) : 162 - 168
  • [38] Value of Diaphragm Ultrasonography for Extubation: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Toledo, T. G.
    Bacci, M. R.
    CRITICAL CARE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 2023
  • [39] The Effects of a Shoulder Roll During Laryngoscopy in Infants: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Crossover Study
    Alfahel, Waseem
    Gopinath, Anupama
    Arheart, Kristopher L.
    Gensler, Tara
    Lerman, Jerrold
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 131 (04): : 1210 - 1216
  • [40] Orally administered moxifloxacin prolongs QTc in healthy Chinese volunteers: a randomized, single-blind, crossover study
    Qian Chen
    Yan-mei Liu
    Yun Liu
    Boaz Mendzelevski
    Dennis Chanter
    Hua-hua Pu
    Gang-yi Liu
    Onglee Weng
    Chao-ying Hu
    Wei Wang
    Chen Yu
    Jing-ying Jia
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 2015, 36 : 448 - 453