Recapitulating COVID-19 detection methods: RT-PCR, sniffer dogs and electronic nose

被引:0
|
作者
Grizzi, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Bax, Carmen [3 ]
Farina, Floriana Maria [4 ]
Tidu, Lorenzo [5 ]
Hegazi, Mohamed A. A. A. [1 ]
Chiriva-Internati, Maurizio [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Capelli, Laura [3 ]
Robbiani, Stefano [9 ]
Dellaca, Raffaele [9 ]
Taverna, Gianluigi [10 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Dept Immunol & Inflammat, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Chem Mat & Chem Engn Giulio Natta, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Med Biotechnol & Translat Med, Milan, Italy
[5] Italian Minist Def, Vittorio Veneto Div, Florence, Italy
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Div Internal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hepatol, Div Internal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Nutr, Div Internal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[9] Politecn Milan, Dept Elect Informat & Bioengn DEIB, TechRes Lab, Milan, Italy
[10] Humanitas Mater Domini, Dept Urol, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Volatile organic compounds; Dog smell; Biological fluid analysis; Odour fingerprint; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; ODOR; VOLATOLOMICS; CANCER; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116430
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
In December 2019, a number of subjects presenting with an unexplained pneumonia-like illness were suspected to have a link to a seafood market in Wuhan, China. Subsequently, this illness was identified as the 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by the World Committee on Virus Classification. Since its initial identification, the virus has rapidly sperad across the globe, posing an extraordinary challenge for the medical community. Currently, the Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is considered the most reliable method for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2. This procedure involves collecting oro-pharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swabs from individuals. Nevertheless, for the early detection of low viral loads, a more sensitive technique, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), has been suggested. Despite the high effectiveness of RT-PCR, there is increasing interest in utilizing highly trained dogs and electronic noses (eNoses) as alternative methods for screening asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2. These dogs and eNoses have demonstrated high sensitivity and can detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs), enabling them to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative individuals. This manuscript recapitulates the potential, advantages, and limitations of employing trained dogs and eNoses for the screening and control of SARS-CoV-2.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of a point-of-care and a standard RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 detection in the emergency department
    Kampolis, C.
    Gkogka, S.
    Varsos, P.
    Pavlou, E.
    Babatseva-Vagena, I.
    Tsartsalis, D.
    Adam, S.
    Drolias, A.
    Charalambous, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [42] Chest CT of COVID-19 in patients with a negative first RT-PCR test Comparison with patients with a positive first RT-PCR test
    Chen, Zu-Hua
    Li, Yun-Jiang
    Wang, Xiu-Juan
    Ye, Yun-Feng
    Wu, Bao-Liang
    Zhang, Yan
    Xuan, Wei-Ling
    Bao, Jian-Feng
    Deng, Xue-Ying
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (26) : E20837
  • [43] COVID-19 Real-Time RT-PCR: Does Positivity on Follow-up RT-PCR Always Imply Infectivity?
    Suri, Tejas
    Mittal, Saurabh
    Tiwari, Pawan
    Mohan, Anant
    Hadda, Vijay
    Madan, Karan
    Guleria, Randeep
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 202 (01) : 147 - 147
  • [44] CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in The Netherlands: A prospective study
    Gietema, Hester A.
    Zelis, Noortje
    Nobel, J. Martijn
    Lambriks, Lars J. G.
    van Alphen, Lieke B.
    Lashof, Astrid M. L. Oude
    Wildberger, Joachim E.
    Nelissen, Irene C.
    Stassen, Patricia M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [45] Positive RT-PCR Test Results in Patients Recovered From COVID-19
    Lan, Lan
    Xu, Dan
    Ye, Guangming
    Xia, Chen
    Wang, Shaokang
    Li, Yirong
    Xu, Haibo
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (15): : 1502 - 1503
  • [46] Comparison of four commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19 in China
    Shen, Lingyu
    Cui, Shujuan
    Zhang, Daitao
    Lin, Changying
    Chen, Lijuan
    Wang, Quanyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2021, 35 (01)
  • [47] Diagnostic accuracy of autoverification and guidance system for COVID-19 RT-PCR results
    Yingmu Cai
    Mengyu Liu
    Zhiyuan Wu
    Cuihong Tian
    Song Qiu
    Zhen Li
    Feng Xu
    Wei Li
    Yan Zheng
    Aijuan Xu
    Longxu Xie
    Xuerui Tan
    [J]. EPMA Journal, 2023, 14 : 119 - 129
  • [48] Reconstructing COVID-19 incidences from positive RT-PCR tests by deconvolution
    Li, Mengtian
    Li, Jiachen
    Wang, Ke
    Li, Lei M.
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [49] Role of radiology in RT-PCR negative COVID-19 pneumonia: Review and recommendations
    Sureka, Binit
    Garg, Pawan Kumar
    Saxena, Suvinay
    Garg, Mahendra Kumar
    Misra, Sanjeev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1814 - 1817
  • [50] Real-time RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis: challenges and prospects
    Sule, Waidi Folorunso
    Oluwayelu, Daniel Oladimeji
    [J]. PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 35