Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of Achilles tendon healing following percutaneous repair with the Dresden instrument

被引:0
|
作者
Joannas, German [1 ,2 ]
Barousse, Rafael [3 ]
Casola, Leandro [1 ,2 ]
Arrondo, Guillermo [1 ]
Rammelt, Stefan [4 ]
Fratantoni, Maria Eugenia [5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dupuytren, Av Belgrano 3402, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Inst Barrancas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Ctr Rossi, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
[5] Hosp Raul Larcade, Buenos Aires, Argentina
来源
ORTHOPADIE | 2024年 / 53卷 / 10期
关键词
Rehabilitation; Acute; Rupture; Follow-up; Minimally invasive surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-024-04565-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Percutaneous Achilles tendon (AT) repair with the Dresden instrument is a safe and effective treatment for AT rupture within 15 days after injury. Follow-up includes clinical examination and imaging to assess the healing process and detect possible complications. The findings of each control visit determine the progression of the rehabilitation of each patient. Methods: We assessed the postoperative findings of all patients who underwent AT with the Dresden technique from May 2022 to September 2023, during a follow-up period of 6 months. The study population included 40 male patients between 18 and 59 years of age. Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in all patients at day 15 postoperatively and then monthly for 6 months. Results: All patients completed 6 months follow-up and 2 (5%) presented with postoperative wound dehiscence. No sural nerve lesions, reruptures, reoperations or other complications were seen. Both imaging methods showed excellent correlation of findings at all time points. Both methods were effective to assess the hematoma and structural changes of the healing process during the first 3 months. The use of US with Doppler was a useful tool to evaluate blood flow to the tendon stumps. After 3 months no significant morphological changes were observed but the US enabled a dynamic functional assessment of the tendon. After 4 months tissues showed homogenization and decrease of volume without further major changes. Conclusion: Both US and MRI proved to be excellent methods to assess the healing process after percutaneous AT repair. The US performed by an experienced investigator showed advantages over MRI in evaluating the gap between the tendon stumps, the possibility of evaluating the vascularity with Doppler US and assessing the functionality of the healing tendon with dynamic examination, besides being a cheap and easily accessible imaging method.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 739
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Functional outcome and complication rate after percutaneous suture of fresh Achilles tendon ruptures with the Dresden instrument
    Manegold, Sebastian
    Tsitsilonis, Serafim
    Schumann, Jakob
    Gehlen, Tobias
    Agres, Alison N.
    Keller, Johannes
    Gesslein, Markus
    Wichlas, Florian
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2018, 19 (01)
  • [22] Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance arthrogram assessment of tendon healing
    Ball, Craig M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (11) : 2161 - 2170
  • [23] Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are not interchangeable to assess the Achilles tendon cross-sectional-area
    Kruse, Annika
    Stafilidis, Savvas
    Tilp, Markus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 117 (01) : 73 - 82
  • [24] Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are not interchangeable to assess the Achilles tendon cross-sectional-area
    Annika Kruse
    Savvas Stafilidis
    Markus Tilp
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2017, 117 : 73 - 82
  • [25] A qualitative assessment of return to sport following Achilles tendon repair
    Peterson, Joshua G.
    Tjong, Vehniah K.
    Mehta, Mitesh P.
    Goyette, Bailey N.
    Patel, Milap
    Kadakia, Anish R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 23 : 46 - 51
  • [26] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING OF ACHILLES-TENDON RUPTURES
    KEENE, JS
    LASH, EG
    FISHER, DR
    DESMET, AA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1989, 17 (03): : 333 - 337
  • [27] Lesions of the Achilles tendon: Evaluation with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Ibrahim, Noha Mohamed AbdelMaboud
    Elsaeed, Hytham Haroun
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (03): : 581 - 587
  • [28] Magnetic resonance imaging of Achilles tendon in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Stiskal, M
    Szolar, DH
    Stenzel, I
    Steiner, E
    Mesaric, P
    Czembirek, H
    Preidler, KW
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1997, 32 (10) : 602 - 608
  • [29] Achilles tendon after percutaneous surgical repair: Serial MRI observation of uncomplicated healing
    Fujikawa, Akira
    Kyoto, Yukishige
    Kawaguchi, Masahisa
    Naoi, Yutaka
    Ukegawa, Yo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (05) : 1169 - 1174
  • [30] Value of ultrasound and MR imaging in the postoperative course of Achilles tendon rupture
    Rominger, MB
    Bachmann, GF
    Schulte, S
    Zedler, AE
    Rau, WS
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 578 - 578