Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of Achilles tendon healing following percutaneous repair with the Dresden instrument

被引:0
|
作者
Joannas, German [1 ,2 ]
Barousse, Rafael [3 ]
Casola, Leandro [1 ,2 ]
Arrondo, Guillermo [1 ]
Rammelt, Stefan [4 ]
Fratantoni, Maria Eugenia [5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dupuytren, Av Belgrano 3402, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Inst Barrancas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Ctr Rossi, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
[5] Hosp Raul Larcade, Buenos Aires, Argentina
来源
ORTHOPADIE | 2024年 / 53卷 / 10期
关键词
Rehabilitation; Acute; Rupture; Follow-up; Minimally invasive surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-024-04565-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Percutaneous Achilles tendon (AT) repair with the Dresden instrument is a safe and effective treatment for AT rupture within 15 days after injury. Follow-up includes clinical examination and imaging to assess the healing process and detect possible complications. The findings of each control visit determine the progression of the rehabilitation of each patient. Methods: We assessed the postoperative findings of all patients who underwent AT with the Dresden technique from May 2022 to September 2023, during a follow-up period of 6 months. The study population included 40 male patients between 18 and 59 years of age. Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in all patients at day 15 postoperatively and then monthly for 6 months. Results: All patients completed 6 months follow-up and 2 (5%) presented with postoperative wound dehiscence. No sural nerve lesions, reruptures, reoperations or other complications were seen. Both imaging methods showed excellent correlation of findings at all time points. Both methods were effective to assess the hematoma and structural changes of the healing process during the first 3 months. The use of US with Doppler was a useful tool to evaluate blood flow to the tendon stumps. After 3 months no significant morphological changes were observed but the US enabled a dynamic functional assessment of the tendon. After 4 months tissues showed homogenization and decrease of volume without further major changes. Conclusion: Both US and MRI proved to be excellent methods to assess the healing process after percutaneous AT repair. The US performed by an experienced investigator showed advantages over MRI in evaluating the gap between the tendon stumps, the possibility of evaluating the vascularity with Doppler US and assessing the functionality of the healing tendon with dynamic examination, besides being a cheap and easily accessible imaging method.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 739
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of Achilles tendon healing following percutaneous repair with the Dresden instrumentBedeutung von Ultraschall und Magnetresonanztomographie bei der Beurteilung der Achillessehnenheilung nach perkutaner Reparatur mit dem Dresdner Instrument
    German Joannas
    Rafael Barousse
    Leandro Casola
    Guillermo Arrondo
    Stefan Rammelt
    Maria Eugenia Fratantoni
    Die Orthopädie, 2024, 53 (10) : 731 - 739
  • [2] Are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of value in assessment of Achilles tendon disorders? A two year prospective study
    Khan, KM
    Forster, BB
    Robinson, J
    Cheong, Y
    Louis, L
    Maclean, L
    Taunton, JE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 37 (02) : 149 - 153
  • [3] Achilles tendon xanthoma imaging on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging
    Fernandes, Eloy de Avila
    Sena Santos, Eduardo Henrique
    de Mello Tucunduva, Tatiana Cardoso
    Ferrari, Antonio J. L.
    Correa Fernandes, Artur da Rocha
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE REUMATOLOGIA, 2015, 55 (03) : 313 - 316
  • [4] Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with the Dresden instrument. Clinical and MRI evaluation of 90 patients
    Joannas, German
    Arrondo, Guillermo
    Eslava, Santiago
    Casola, Leandro
    Drago, Juan
    Barousse, Rafael
    Nino Gomez, Daniel
    Amlang, Michael
    Rammelt, Stefan
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (02) : 209 - 217
  • [5] Ultrasound of the Achilles tendon after percutaneous repair
    Miquel, A.
    Molina, V.
    Phan, C.
    Lesavre, A.
    Menu, Y.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2009, 90 (03): : 305 - 309
  • [6] Achilles Tendon Healing Response Following Failed Repair: An MRI Assessment
    Lawrence, Steven J.
    Wise, James N.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 31 (06) : 538 - 541
  • [7] Healing of the Achilles tendon in rabbits—evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology
    Wilson Campos Tavares
    Ubiratam Brum de Castro
    Eduardo Paulino
    Leonardo de Souza Vasconcellos
    Ana Paula Madureira
    Maria Angélica Baron Magalhães
    Daniel Victor Moreira Mendes
    Adriana Maria Kakehasi
    Vivian Resende
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 9
  • [8] Alterations in structure of the muscle-tendon unit and gait pattern after percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon rupture with the Dresden instrument
    Manegold, Sebastian
    Tsitsilonis, Serafim
    Gehlen, Tobias
    Kopf, Sebastian
    Duda, Georg N.
    Agres, Alison N.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (04) : 529 - 533
  • [9] Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair
    Mazek, Jacek
    Gnatowski, Maciej
    Porthos Salas, Antonio
    Domzalski, Marcin
    Mazek, Mateusz
    TECHNIQUES IN FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2024, 23 (01): : 21 - 26
  • [10] Magnetic resonance imaging after operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture
    Maffulli, N
    Thorpe, AP
    Smith, FW
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2001, 11 (03) : 156 - 162