A decade's experience with retrograde open mesenteric stenting for acute mesenteric ischemia

被引:1
|
作者
Habib, Salim G. [1 ]
Semaan, Dana B. [1 ]
Andraska, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Madigan, Michael C. [1 ]
Al-Khoury, Georges E. [1 ]
Chaer, Rabih A. [1 ]
Eslami, Mohammad H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charleston Area Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, 3200 MacCorle Ave SE, Charleston, WV 25311 USA
关键词
Retrograde open mesenteric stenting; Acute mesenteric ischemia; Retrospective study; OUTCOMES; BYPASS; ANTEGRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.010
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is an alternative to mesenteric bypass in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) with variable reported 30-day mortality rates. Large studies evaluating patient outcomes following ROMS are scarce. Our study aims to assess the results of this approach among patients presenting with AMI. Methods: We reviewed all the patients with AMI who were treated with ROMS (2011-2022). Patient demographics, presentation, operative details, and outcomes were analyzed. Primary end points were in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimate for 1-year mortality and primary patency loss were generated. Secondary end points included postoperative 30-day complications. Results: Between 2011 and 2022, ROMS was attempted on a total of 42 patients. The median age was 70 +/- 15 years and the majority of patients were female. Pain out of proportion to the physical examination was the most common presenting symptom (n = 18, 42.9%) followed by peritonitis (n = 14, 33.4%). All patients underwent preoperative intravenous contrast computed tomography imaging. In situ thrombosis was identified as the etiology of AMI in 36 patients (85.7%). Technical success was achieved in 40 patients (95.2%). Conventional, non-hybrid operating rooms were used for the majority of cases. Revascularization of all 40 patients involved angioplasty and stenting of superior mesenteric artery. A single stent was placed in 35 patients (87.5%) and the reminder had more than one stent. Eighty percent of patients required bowel resection. A second-look laparotomy was required in 34 patients (85.0%). The mean operative time, including both the general surgery and vascular surgery portions of the index procedure, was 192 +/- 57 minutes. Sepsis was the most common complication observed within 30 days, occurring in 8 patients (20.0%). In terms of mortality, 13 patients (32.5%) died during their index hospitalization, and 9 died (22.5%) within 30 days. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 1year overall patient survival rate was 58.6%, and the primary patency rate for stents was 51.4%. Conclusions: ROMS has an excellent technical success rate in management of AMI with lower than traditionally reported mortality rates for AMI. The dual benefits of rapid revascularization and bowel evaluation should make this surgical modality an alternative approach for treatment of AMI. (J Vasc Surg 2024;80:831-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 837
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mesenteric Artery Stenting Using Embolic Protection Device for Treatment of Acute or Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
    Mendes, Bernardo
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    Tallarita, Tiziano
    Kanamori, Karina
    Kalra, Manju
    Fleming, Mark
    DeMartino, Randall R.
    Gloviczki, Peter
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (06) : 30S - 31S
  • [32] Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in acute mesenteric ischemia
    Gartenschlaeger, Soeren
    Bender, Siegfried
    Maeurer, Juergen
    Schroeder, Ralf J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (02) : 398 - 400
  • [33] Successful Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
    Soeren Gartenschlaeger
    Siegfried Bender
    Juergen Maeurer
    Ralf J. Schroeder
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2008, 31 : 398 - 400
  • [34] SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF ACUTE MESENTERIC ISCHEMIA IN THE PAST DECADE.
    Lim, H.
    Park, K.
    Jeong, S.
    Ryoo, S.
    Kwon, Y.
    Park, J.
    Kim, M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E290 - E290
  • [35] Comparative Outcomes of Open Mesenteric Bypass after Prior Failed Endovascular or Open Mesenteric Revascularization for Acute and Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
    Jacobs, Chris
    Jacobs, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (05) : S316 - S316
  • [36] Celiac and Superior/Inferior Mesenteric Angioplasty and Stenting for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Single-Center Experience
    Rajaratnam, Kanapathi
    Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
    Ramli, Ahmad Hariz
    Shehata, Amro
    Jackson, Ralph
    Clarke, Michael J.
    ANGIOLOGY, 2017, 68 (07) : 571 - 574
  • [37] Jejunal arterial access for retrograde mesenteric stenting
    Gilmore, Brian F.
    Fang, Charles
    Turner, Megan C.
    Nag, Uttara P.
    Turley, Ryan
    McCann, Richard L.
    Cox, Mitchell W.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (05) : 1613 - 1617
  • [38] Chronic mesenteric ischemia: Open surgery versus percutaneous angioplasty and stenting
    Kasirajan, K
    O'Hara, PT
    Gray, BH
    Hertzer, NR
    Clair, DG
    Greenberg, RK
    Krajewski, LP
    Beven, EG
    Ouriel, K
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [39] Acute mesenteric ischemia
    Czerny, M
    Trubel, W
    Claeys, L
    Scheuba, C
    Huk, I
    Prager, M
    Polterauer, P
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1997, 122 (07): : 538 - 544
  • [40] ACUTE MESENTERIC ISCHEMIA
    INDERBITZI, R
    WAGNER, HE
    SEILER, C
    STIRNEMANN, P
    GERTSCH, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 158 (02) : 123 - 126