Causal inference with hidden mediators

被引:0
|
作者
Ghassami, Amiremad [1 ]
Yang, Alan [2 ]
Shpitser, Ilya [3 ]
Tchetgen, Eric Tchetgen [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Math & Stat, 665 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, 350 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Comp Sci, 3400 North Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat & Data Sci, 265 South 37th St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Direct and indirect effects; Front-door model; Influence function; Measurement error; Mediation analysis; Proximal causal inference;
D O I
10.1093/biomet/asae037
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Proximal causal inference was recently proposed as a framework to identify causal effects from observational data in the presence of hidden confounders for which proxies are available. In this paper, we extend the proximal causal inference approach to settings where identification of causal effects hinges upon a set of mediators that are not observed, yet error prone proxies of the hidden mediators are measured. Specifically, (i) we establish causal hidden mediation analysis, which extends classical causal mediation analysis methods for identifying natural direct and indirect effects under no unmeasured confounding to a setting where the mediator of interest is hidden, but proxies of it are available; (ii) we establish a hidden front-door criterion, criterion to allow for hidden mediators for which proxies are available; (iii) we show that the identification of a certain causal effect called the population intervention indirect effect remains possible with hidden mediators in settings where challenges in (i) and (ii) might co-exist. We view (i)-(iii) as important steps towards the practical application of front-door criteria and mediation analysis as mediators are almost always measured with error and, thus, the most one can hope for in practice is that the measurements are at best proxies of mediating mechanisms. We propose identification approaches for the parameters of interest in our considered models. For the estimation aspect, we propose an influence function-based estimation method and provide an analysis for the robustness of the estimators.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An introduction to causal inference
    Sobel, ME
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1996, 24 (03) : 353 - 379
  • [32] Causal dynamic inference
    Bochman, Alexander
    Gabbay, Dov M.
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 66 (1-4) : 231 - 256
  • [33] NONEXPERIMENTAL CAUSAL INFERENCE
    PAISLEY, MB
    PAISLEY, WJ
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1971, 35 (03) : 478 - &
  • [34] ON THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    KARHAUSEN, LR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 126 (03) : 556 - 557
  • [35] Causal inference in pharmacoepidemiology
    Pazzagli, Laura
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    Hernan, Miguel
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 414 - 415
  • [36] Introduction to causal inference
    Spirtes, Peter
    Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2010, 11 : 1643 - 1662
  • [37] Causal Inference by Compression
    Budhathoki, Kailash
    Vreeken, Jilles
    2016 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2016, : 41 - 50
  • [38] Improving causal inference
    Ebrahim, Shah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (02) : 363 - 366
  • [39] Ancestral Causal Inference
    Magliacane, Sara
    Claassen, Tom
    Mooij, Joris M.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [40] Interventions and causal inference
    Eberhardt, Frederick
    Scheines, Richard
    PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2007, 74 (05) : 981 - 995