A new extension of the EDAS method in a fuzzy environment for group decision-making

被引:0
|
作者
Kacprzak, Dariusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Bialystok Tech Univ, Fac Comp Sci, Dept Math, Wiejska 45A, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
关键词
Multi-criteria group decision-making; EDAS method; Fuzzy numbers; Fuzzy EDAS; C44; O14; EXTENDED TOPSIS METHOD; SELECTION; INFORMATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s40622-024-00396-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The complexity of the decision-making problems being analysed has led to the development of multiple multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. One of the more recent methods belonging to this group is the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method. To date, it has found extensive use in solving real-world decision-making problems and has seen many extensions to input data types other than real numbers. One of these is the EDAS method for group decision-making in a fuzzy environment. This method aggregates individual evaluations of decision-makers into a group evaluation using the arithmetic mean. This may result in equal group ratings despite the variety of individual ratings, making it difficult or even impossible to rank alternatives because the EDAS algorithm will be blocked. The paper proposes a new fuzzy extension of EDAS called the PFEDAS method for group decision-making. The main difference between the proposed method and the original one is that at the initial stage the individual decision matrices are not aggregated into a group matrix but are transformed into matrices of alternatives. As a result, the new PFEDAS method is based on the initial data instead of their averaged values which allows a more accurate comparison of alternatives. Using a numerical example, the PFEDAS method is compared with other similar methods known from the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 277
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stochastic decision-making in a fuzzy environment
    Iwamoto, S
    Fujita, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1995, 38 (04) : 467 - 482
  • [42] Complex Fuzzy Rough Aggregation Operators and their Applications in EDAS for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making
    Khan, Faiz Muhammad
    Bibi, Naila
    Abdullah, Saleem
    Ullah, Azmat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY LOGIC AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2023, 23 (03) : 270 - 293
  • [43] An extension behavioural TOPSIS method for decision-making problem with fuzzy information
    Khademi, Fereshteh
    Balf, Farzad Rezai
    Rabbani, Mohsen
    Shahverdi, Reza
    [J]. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2024, 17 (02) : 250 - 269
  • [44] Hybrid Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Method for Offshore Location Selection Under Fuzzy Environment
    Mehmet Şahin
    [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2020, 45 : 6887 - 6909
  • [45] Equilibrium Linguistic Computation Method for Fuzzy Group Decision-Making
    Tarmudi, Zamali
    Tap, Abu Osman Md
    Abdullah, Mohd Lazim
    [J]. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 6 (02): : 225 - 242
  • [46] Group decision-making based on pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method
    Akram, Muhammad
    Dudek, Wieslaw A.
    Ilyas, Farwa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (07) : 1455 - 1475
  • [47] Hybrid Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Method for Offshore Location Selection Under Fuzzy Environment
    Sahin, Mehmet
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 45 (08) : 6887 - 6909
  • [48] A New Method to Decision-Making with Fuzzy Competition Hypergraphs
    Sarwar, Musavarah
    Akram, Muhammad
    Alshehri, Noura Omair
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (09):
  • [49] An Improved EDAS Method Based on Bipolar Neutrosophic Set and Its Application in Group Decision-Making
    Irvanizam, Irvanizam
    Syahrini, Intan
    Zi, Nawar Nabila
    Azzahra, Natasya
    Iqbal, Muhd
    Marzuki, Marzuki
    Subianto, Muhammad
    [J]. APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 2021
  • [50] Group Decision Making in fuzzy environment
    Gupta, Mahima
    [J]. 2012 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR FINANCIAL ENGINEERING & ECONOMICS (CIFER), 2012, : 128 - 132