Interprofessional Evaluation of a Medication Clinical Decision Support System Prior to Implementation

被引:2
|
作者
Bauer, Jacqueline [1 ,2 ]
Busse, Marika [1 ,2 ]
Kopetzky, Tanja [3 ]
Seggewies, Christof [3 ]
Fromm, Martin F. [4 ,5 ]
Doerje, Frank [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Pharm Dept, Palmsanlage 3, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Palmsanlage 3, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Ctr Informat & Commun Technol MIK, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Expt & Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, FAU NeW Res Ctr New Bioact Cpds, Erlangen, Germany
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
clinical decision support system; clinical pharmacists; evaluation; medication safety; alert fatigue; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS; ALERTS; PERFORMANCE; ACCEPTANCE; OUTCOMES; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0044-1787184
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are widespread due to increasing digitalization of hospitals. They can be associated with reduced medication errors and improved patient safety, but also with well-known risks (e.g., overalerting, nonadoption). Objectives Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a commonly used CDSS containing Medication-Safety-Validators (e.g., drug-drug interactions), which can be locally activated or deactivated, to identify limitations and thereby potentially optimize the use of the CDSS in clinical routine. Methods Within the implementation process of Meona (commercial CPOE/CDSS) at a German University hospital, we conducted an interprofessional evaluation of the CDSS and its included Medication-Safety-Validators following a defined algorithm: (1) general evaluation, (2) systematic technical and content-related validation, (3) decision of activation or deactivation, and possibly (4) choosing the activation mode (interruptive or passive). We completed the in-depth evaluation for exemplarily chosen Medication-Safety-Validators. Moreover, we performed a survey among 12 German University hospitals using Meona to compare their configurations. Results Based on the evaluation, we deactivated 3 of 10 Medication-Safety-Validators due to technical or content-related limitations. For the seven activated Medication-Safety-Validators, we chose the interruptive option ["PUSH-(&PULL)-modus"] four times (4/7), and a new, on-demand option ["only-PULL-modus"] three times (3/7). The site-specific configuration (activation or deactivation) differed across all participating hospitals in the survey and led to varying medication safety alerts for identical patient cases. Conclusion An interprofessional evaluation of CPOE and CDSS prior to implementation in clinical routine is crucial to detect limitations. This can contribute to a sustainable utilization and thereby possibly increase medication safety.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 649
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] OntoPharma: ontology based clinical decision support system to reduce medication prescribing errors
    Elena Calvo-Cidoncha
    Concepción Camacho-Hernando
    Faust Feu
    Xavier Pastor-Duran
    Carles Codina-Jané
    Raimundo Lozano-Rubí
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22
  • [42] CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM
    GOERTZEL, G
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1969, 161 (A2) : 689 - &
  • [43] OntoPharma: ontology based clinical decision support system to reduce medication prescribing errors
    Calvo-Cidoncha, Elena
    Camacho-Hernando, Concepcion
    Feu, Faust
    Pastor-Duran, Xavier
    Codina-Jane, Carles
    Lozano-Rubi, Raimundo
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [44] Implementation of a clinical decision support tool at time of intramuscular penicillin G prescribing reduces medication errors
    Pallotta, Andrea M.
    Wesolowski, Jill
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2021, 78 (21) : 1937 - 1938
  • [45] Improving the Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Rueping, Stefan
    Anguita, Alberto
    Bucur, Anca
    Cirstea, Traian Cristian
    Jacobs, Bjoern
    Torge, Antje
    2013 35TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2013, : 3214 - 3217
  • [46] Implementation of Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tools
    Yang, Alvin
    Kuang, Wayne
    Guan, Angel
    Woo, Benjamin K. P.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (12) : 6432 - 6432
  • [47] Imaging Appropriateness and Implementation of Clinical Decision Support
    Boland, Giles W.
    Weilburg, Jeffrey
    Duszak, Richard, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (06) : 601 - 603
  • [48] Implementation of a clinical decision support system for the optimization of antidiabetic drug orders by pharmacists
    Robert, Laurine
    Quindroit, Paul
    Henry, Heloise
    Perez, Maxime
    Rousseliere, Chloe
    Lemaitre, Madleen
    Vambergue, Anne
    Decaudin, Bertrand
    Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 90 (01) : 239 - 246
  • [49] The implementation of clinical decision support system for caring of patients with cancer and nurses' opinions
    Yilmaz, A. Akman
    Ozdemir, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2014, 18 : S33 - S33
  • [50] Design and implementation of a nursing clinical decision support system to promote guideline adherence
    Lyerla, Frank
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2008, 26 (04) : 227 - 233