Stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making for long-term comprehensive operation of cascade reservoirs under multiple uncertainties

被引:1
|
作者
Hu, Hu [1 ]
Zuo, Qiting [1 ]
Li, He [1 ]
Yang, Kan [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Water Conservancy & Transportat, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
关键词
Stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making; Uncertainty; Multi-objective optimization; Combination weighting method; Gray cumulative prospect theory; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101758
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Study region: The Three Gorges cascade (TGC) reservoirs, China. Study focus: Since uncertainties inherent in inflow forecasting, elevation -storage, discharge capacity, flood routing, and the preferences of decision makers (DMs) persist in the attribute measurements (AMs) and weights (AWs), problems where multiple DMs select the best compromise scheme for the long-term comprehensive operation of cascade reservoirs considering numerous attributes become a stochastic multi -attribute group decision -making (MAGDM) process. To represent uncertain AMs and AWs and consider the bounded rationality of DMs, we propose a stochastic MAGDM with integrated stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) and gray cumulative prospect theory (GCPT), namely, SMAA-GCPT. After quantifying the uncertainties, SMAA-GCPT is used to model uncertain AMs and imperfect AWs with calculable probability distributions and map the sampled AMs and AWs to utility values to reflect the overall performance assuming bounded rationality. New hydrological insights for the region: Experiments on the TGC indicate that SMAA-GCPT can effectively differentiate alternative schemes and select the best compromise scheme to harmonize the conflicting benefits and risks of the TGC, with higher reliability than SMAA-2 and SMAA-GRA. The influence of uncertain AMs on the reliability of SMAA-GCPT is more obvious than that of uncertain AWs. The decision -making error risk is primarily sensitive to the inflow forecasting uncertainty, followed by the flood routing uncertainty, and is less affected by the uncertainties in elevation -storage and discharge capacity curves.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD UNDER RISK WITH UNKNOWN ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS
    Han, Zuosheng
    Liu, Peide
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2011, 17 (02) : 246 - 258
  • [32] A multi-attribute decision-making model for the evaluation of uncertainties in traffic pollution control planning
    Wei, Ming
    Sun, Bo
    Wang, Han
    Xu, Zhihuo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (18) : 17911 - 17917
  • [33] Improved multi-attribute fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in project delivery decision-making
    Wang Zhuo-fu
    Hong Wei-min
    Xun Jun-zu
    Yan Bin
    [J]. 2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 7844 - 7848
  • [34] A multi-attribute decision-making model for the evaluation of uncertainties in traffic pollution control planning
    Ming Wei
    Bo Sun
    Han Wang
    Zhihuo Xu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 17911 - 17917
  • [35] A novel multi-attribute group decision-making method for heterogeneous preferences and attribute interaction contexts
    Zhao, Chengwei
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Liu, Ruihuan
    He, Jishan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 221
  • [36] TOPSIS algorithm for multi-attribute group decision-making with weighted ordinal preferences
    Li, Wu
    Zhang, Qifeng
    Rao, Congjun
    [J]. Huazhong Keji Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 37 (01): : 77 - 80
  • [37] Multi-attribute group decision-making approach dealing with linguistic assessment information
    Liao, Xiu-Wu
    Li, Yuan
    Dong, Guang-Mao
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2006, 26 (09): : 90 - 98
  • [38] A new decision analysis framework for multi-attribute decision-making under interval uncertainty
    Pan, Xiao-Hong
    He, Shi-Fan
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2024, 480
  • [39] Two-phase TOPSIS of uncertain multi-attribute group decision-making
    Zhou, Wenkun
    Jiang, Wenchun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2010, 21 (03) : 423 - 430
  • [40] Multi-attribute group decision-making based on the Neutrosophic Bonferroni mean operator
    Kanchana A.
    Nagarajan D.
    Broumi S.
    [J]. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2023, 57 : 139 - 164