Clinical Effect Analysis of Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Xue, Hong [1 ]
Chen, Meng [1 ]
Li, Shuqin [2 ]
Zhou, Yongchun [3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Dept Gynecol, Wuhu Hosp, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] First Affiliated Hosp, Wannan Med Coll, Dept Gynaecol, Wuhu 241001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Bengbu Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat, Bengbu 233099, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
abdominal radical hysterectomy; early-stage cervical cancer; laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy; pelvic auto- nomic nerve; survival outcomes;
D O I
10.31083/j.ceog5106129
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: There is much controversy about the utility of open and laparoscopic surgery procedures for cervical cancer following the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial. The main objective of this study was to determine the utility of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) in improvement of postoperative bladder and rectal function and clinical outcomes of patients with common types of early-stage cervical cancer and tumor diameters <<2 cm. Methods: Ninety cases of common types of early-stage cervical cancer with tumor diameters <<2 cm were primarily treated with surgery from 2015 to 2021. Forty-five patients underwent LNSRH were classified as the study group and the remaining 45 patients underwent traditional abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and classified as the observation group. The clinical and survival outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. Results: We observed no significant differences in the amount of blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, length of vaginal resection and length of parametrium resection between the two groups (p >> 0.05). The overall time of operation for LNSRH was longer than that for ARH (p << 0.001). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at 8, 24 and 48 hours were significantly different between the two groups (p << 0.001). Catheter retention, flatus and spontaneous defecation times of the LNSRH group were significantly shorter than those of the ARH group (p << 0.05). The proportion of patients with dysuria, abdominal pressure urination and constipation at 6 months after surgery in the LNSRH group was markedly lower relative to the ARH group (p << 0.05). Evaluation of urodynamic parameters 12 months after surgery revealed faster recovery of the LNSRH group (p << 0.05). Postoperative survival rates were not markedly different between the groups (p >> 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy is beneficial for patients with common types of early-stage cervical cancer and small tumors. The procedure effectively improves bladder and rectal function after surgery and promotes rapid recovery with no adverse effects on survival outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COMPARISON BETWEEN SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTICASSIST NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR EARLY STAGE OF CERVICAL CANCER
    Wang, Y. T.
    Chen, W. S.
    Lin, W. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 432 - 433
  • [12] Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
    Makowski, Marcin
    Nowak, Marek
    Szpakowski, Marian
    Wladzinski, Jacek
    Serwach-Nowinska, Anna
    Janas, Lukasz
    Wilczynski, Jacek R.
    MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2014, 13 (03): : 180 - 185
  • [13] Nerve-Sparing Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage (FIGO IA2-IB) Cervical Cancer A Comparative Study on Feasibility and Outcome
    van Gent, Mignon Dingena Johanna Maria
    van den Haak, Lukas Wesley
    Gaarenstroom, Katja Nicolien
    Peters, Alexander A. W.
    van Poelgeest, Mariette Inie Elisabeth
    Trimbos, Johanes Baptist Maria Zacharias
    de Kroon, Cor Doede
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (04) : 735 - 743
  • [14] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life
    van Gent, M. D. J. M.
    Romijn, L. M.
    van Santen, K. E.
    Trimbos, J. B. M. Z.
    de Kroon, C. D.
    MATURITAS, 2016, 94 : 30 - 38
  • [15] Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction
    Wu, Jiayue
    Ye, Taiyang
    Lv, Jianwei
    He, Zhihong
    Zhu, Jie
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (03) : 417 - +
  • [16] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa)
    Kietpeerakool, Chumnan
    Aue-Aungkul, Apiwat
    Galaal, Khadra
    Ngamjarus, Chetta
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (02):
  • [17] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: Evolution of concepts
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Ditto, Antonino
    Hanozet, Francesco
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Solinia, Eugenio
    Zanaboni, Flavia
    Kusamura, Shigeki
    Fontanelli, Rosanna
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 107 (01) : S119 - S121
  • [18] Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Frumovitz, Michael
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 110 (03) : S21 - S24
  • [19] Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
    Ditto, Antonino
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Lopez, Carlos
    Perotto, Stefania
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (03)
  • [20] LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY COMPARED TO LAPAROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL CANCER
    Klasa, L.
    Sawicki, S.
    Wydra, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A235 - A235