Clinical Effect Analysis of Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Xue, Hong [1 ]
Chen, Meng [1 ]
Li, Shuqin [2 ]
Zhou, Yongchun [3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Dept Gynecol, Wuhu Hosp, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] First Affiliated Hosp, Wannan Med Coll, Dept Gynaecol, Wuhu 241001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Bengbu Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat, Bengbu 233099, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
abdominal radical hysterectomy; early-stage cervical cancer; laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy; pelvic auto- nomic nerve; survival outcomes;
D O I
10.31083/j.ceog5106129
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: There is much controversy about the utility of open and laparoscopic surgery procedures for cervical cancer following the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial. The main objective of this study was to determine the utility of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) in improvement of postoperative bladder and rectal function and clinical outcomes of patients with common types of early-stage cervical cancer and tumor diameters <<2 cm. Methods: Ninety cases of common types of early-stage cervical cancer with tumor diameters <<2 cm were primarily treated with surgery from 2015 to 2021. Forty-five patients underwent LNSRH were classified as the study group and the remaining 45 patients underwent traditional abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and classified as the observation group. The clinical and survival outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. Results: We observed no significant differences in the amount of blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, length of vaginal resection and length of parametrium resection between the two groups (p >> 0.05). The overall time of operation for LNSRH was longer than that for ARH (p << 0.001). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at 8, 24 and 48 hours were significantly different between the two groups (p << 0.001). Catheter retention, flatus and spontaneous defecation times of the LNSRH group were significantly shorter than those of the ARH group (p << 0.05). The proportion of patients with dysuria, abdominal pressure urination and constipation at 6 months after surgery in the LNSRH group was markedly lower relative to the ARH group (p << 0.05). Evaluation of urodynamic parameters 12 months after surgery revealed faster recovery of the LNSRH group (p << 0.05). Postoperative survival rates were not markedly different between the groups (p >> 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy is beneficial for patients with common types of early-stage cervical cancer and small tumors. The procedure effectively improves bladder and rectal function after surgery and promotes rapid recovery with no adverse effects on survival outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Kim, D.
    Park, J.
    Suh, D.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, Y.
    Nam, J.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (03) : S94 - S94
  • [2] Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Parametrectomy for Occult Early-Stage Invasive Cervical Cancer After Simple Hysterectomy
    Li, Junnan
    Xu, Huicheng
    Chen, Yong
    Wang, Dan
    Li, Yuyan
    Liang, Zhiqing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (08) : 1383 - 1388
  • [3] Efficacy of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer
    Duan, Demin
    Liu, Biao
    Li, Li
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (02): : 743 - 749
  • [4] ROBOTIC NERVE-SPARING VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN EARLY CERVICAL CANCER : URINARY DISEASES
    Narducci, F.
    Merlot, B.
    Bresson, L.
    Nickers, P.
    Leblanc, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [5] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
    Jarruwale, Phanida
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Benavides, Doris R.
    Su, Hsuan
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    [J]. GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2013, 2 (02): : 42 - 47
  • [6] CLINICAL ADVANTAGES OF NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY OF CERVICAL CANCER
    Parry, S.
    Riesle, H.
    Bazan, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 : 37 - 37
  • [7] Nerve plane-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: Surgical technique and clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer
    Zhao, D.
    Li, B.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 142 - 142
  • [8] NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH INFILTRATIVE CERVICAL CANCER
    Dermenzhy, T.
    Svintsitskiy, V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 2027 - 2027
  • [9] Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Bae, Jong Woon
    Han, Myoungseok
    Cho, Yeon Jean
    Park, Jung-Woo
    Oh, So Ra
    Kim, Su Jin
    Choe, Sun Yi
    Yun, Jeong Hye
    Lee, Yongmin
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12 (02) : 160 - 168
  • [10] Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer
    Liu, Zhongyu
    Li, Xiuli
    Tao, Ye
    Li, Weiping
    Yang, Yizhuo
    Yao, Yuanqing
    Zhu, Tongyu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 25 : 54 - 58