Bridge Proxy Indicators for Risk-Based Asset Management and Resilience Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Alipour, Alice [1 ]
Miner, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
resilience; transportation infrastructure; vulnerability a assessment; SCOUR;
D O I
10.1177/03611981241257409
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Extreme weather events pose serious threats to transportation infrastructure assets and cause difficulties for the transportation agencies managing infrastructure systems. Climate models predict an increase in the frequency and intensity of precipitation in many parts of the United States. Similar threats are expected as the developing climate trends continue to place increasing amounts of stress on transportation assets. Considering the uncertainties associated with climate trends and the ever-increasing stresses on transportation infrastructure, state departments of transportation need to assess their potential exposure to extreme weather, define appropriate vulnerability measures or proxy indicators, and plan to reverse the adverse effects of such hazards by developing mitigation strategies and planning response and recovery efforts for potential failures. Assessment of such exposure with high-fidelity models for all exposed assets is not possible. This requires a robust indicator providing an overview of the exposure, sensitivity, or adaptive capacity of a specific asset. This paper uses the available data for the state of Iowa to generate a suite of proxy indicators to assess the flood risk to bridges. The proxy indicators are stream channel instability, structural condition, and the criticality of the bridge to the network. It is expected that such proxy indicators, based on readily available data from existing national databases, could enable bridge owners to quickly assess potential vulnerabilities and start planning for them. The use of National Bridge Inventory data to develop and apply these proxy indicators will allow for scalability of the method to more US states.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Risk-Based Approach for Asset Allocation with A Defaultable Share
    Shen, Yang
    Siu, Tak Kuen
    RISKS, 2018, 6 (01):
  • [42] Risk-based damage assessment and maintenance management for turbine components
    Fujiyama, K
    Fujiwara, T
    Nakatani, Y
    Sawa, T
    Ishii, J
    Horino, M
    Nishimura, M
    Kitayama, K
    BALTICA VI: LIFE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE FOR POWER PLANTS, VOL 1 AND 2, 2004, 233-234 : 42 - 54
  • [43] Risk-based decisions: Implementing the asset integrity program
    Henao, Felipe A.
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2021, 40 : S24 - S31
  • [44] Risk-based asset replacement in EHV transmission networks
    Fleckenstein, Marco
    Balzer, Gerd
    Neumann, Claus
    Wasserrab, Andreas
    2014 49TH INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (UPEC), 2014,
  • [45] Study on bridge asset management in Korea based on infrastructure asset management methodology
    Park, K. -H.
    Sun, J. -W.
    Hwang, Y. -K.
    Park, C.
    Lee, M. -J
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE OPTIMIZATION, 2010, : 2240 - 2247
  • [46] Water Resource Management: Moving from Single Risk-Based Management to Resilience to Multiple Stressors
    Bunney, Sarah
    Lawson, Elizabeth
    Cotterill, Sarah
    Butler, David
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [47] Development of Risk-Based Process Safety Indicators
    Khan, Faisal
    Abunada, Hasan
    John, David
    Benmosbah, Toufik
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2010, 29 (02) : 133 - 143
  • [48] The Role of Risk-Based Indicators for the Air Carrier
    Plos, V.
    Sousek, R.
    Vittek, P.
    Stojic, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE TRANSPORT MEANS 2016, 2016, : 213 - 215
  • [49] Concepts in Risk-Based Assessment
    Fraass, Benedick
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3807 - 3807
  • [50] Verification of the Framework for Risk-Based Bridge Inspection
    Washer, Glenn
    Connor, Robert
    Nasrollahi, Massoud
    Reising, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (04)