Experiential Learning with Ketamine: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study on Prescription and Perception

被引:0
|
作者
Ilg, Annette M. [1 ,8 ]
Beltran, Christine P. [2 ]
Shih, Jenny A. [3 ,4 ]
Yankama, Tuyen T. [5 ]
Hayes, Margaret M. [6 ]
Moskowitz, Ari L. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Mass Gen Brigham, Dept Emergency Med, Div Emergency Crit Care, Boston, MA USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Carl J Shapiro Inst Educ & Res, Boston, MA USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pulm & Crit Care, Boston, MA USA
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Boston, MA USA
[6] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Crit Care Med, New York, NY USA
[8] Mass Gen Brigham, Dept Emergency Med, Div Crit Care, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
analgosedation; continuing education; learning theory; ketamine; critical care; ANALGOSEDATION; INFUSION;
D O I
10.2147/TCRM.S462760
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Incorporating unfamiliar therapies into practice requires effective longitudinal learning and the optimal way to achieve this is debated. Though not a novel therapy, ketamine in critical care has a paucity of data and variable acceptance, with limited research describing intensivist perceptions and utilization. The Coronavirus-19 pandemic presented a particular crisis where providers rapidly adapted analgosedation strategies to achieve prolonged, deep sedation due to a surge of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).<br /> Question: How does clinical experience with ketamine impact the perception and attitude of clinicians toward this therapy?<br /> Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using quantitative ketamine prescription data and qualitative focus group data. We analyzed prescription patterns of ketamine in a tertiary academic ICU during two different time points: pre-COVID-19 (March 1- June 30, 2019) and during the COVID-19 surge (March 1-June 30, 2020). Two focus groups (FG) of critical care attendings were held, and data were analyzed using the Framework Method for content analysis.<br /> Results: Four-hundred forty-six medical ICU patients were mechanically ventilated (195 pre-COVID-19 and 251 during COVID-19). The COVID-19 population was more likely to receive ketamine (81[32.3%] vs 4 [2.1%], p < 0.001). Thirteen respondents participated across two FG sessions (Pre-COVID = 8, Post-COVID=5). The most prevalent attitude among our respondents was discomfort, with three key themes identified as follows: 1) lack of evidence regarding ketamine, 2) lack of personal experience, and 3) desire for more education and protocols.<br /> Conclusion: Despite a substantial increase in ketamine prescription during COVID-19, intensivists continued to feel discomfort with utilization. Factors contributing to this discomfort include a lack of evidence, a lack of experience, and a desire for more education and protocols. Increase in experience with ketamine alone was not sufficient to minimize provider discomfort. These findings should inform future curricula and call for process improvement to optimize continuing education.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 390
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Service-Learning or Internship: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Experiential Learning Pedagogies
    Leary, Miriam P.
    Sherlock, Lori A.
    [J]. EDUCATION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [2] Consumer perception of food variety in the UK: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis
    Embling, Rochelle
    Pink, Aimee E.
    Lee, Michelle D.
    Price, Menna
    Wilkinson, Laura L.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01) : 1449
  • [3] Consumer perception of food variety in the UK: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis
    Rochelle Embling
    Aimee E. Pink
    Michelle D. Lee
    Menna Price
    Laura L. Wilkinson
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 20
  • [4] Crowdsourcing trainees in a living systematic review provided valuable experiential learning opportunities: a mixed-methods study
    Lee, Chloe
    Thomas, Megan
    Ejaredar, Maede
    Kassam, Aliya
    Whittle, Samuel L.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Tugwell, Peter
    Wells, George
    Pardo, Jordi Pardo
    Hazlewood, Glen S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 147 : 142 - 150
  • [5] Technical Training Evaluation Revisited: An Exploratory, Mixed-Methods Study
    Williams, Rachele C.
    Nafukho, Fredrick Muyia
    [J]. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT QUARTERLY, 2015, 28 (01) : 69 - 93
  • [6] College Students and Yik Yak: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study
    Clark-Gordon, Cathlin V.
    Workman, Kimberly E.
    Linvill, Darren L.
    [J]. SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2017, 3 (02):
  • [7] Infanticide in Senegal: results from an exploratory mixed-methods study
    Moseson, Heidi
    Ouedraogo, Ramatou
    Diallo, Soukeyna
    Sakho, Amy
    [J]. SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2019, 27 (01) : 203 - 214
  • [8] Health Coaching for People With Disabilities: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study
    Standley, Krys
    Ravesloot, Craig
    Sage, Rayna
    Sondag, K. Ann
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 37 (03) : 345 - 355
  • [10] Prescription Opioid Resiliency and Vulnerability: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Case Study
    Andy Hochstetler
    David J. Peters
    Shannon M. Monnat
    [J]. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2022, 47 : 651 - 671