Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic accuracies of four different malaria rapid diagnostic test kits available in Ghana

被引:0
|
作者
Aninagyei, Enoch [1 ]
Deku, John Gameli [2 ]
Yemofio, Keren Trishia [1 ]
Quainoo, Ekua [1 ]
Ntiri, Kofi Adjei [3 ]
Yaro, Evelyn [4 ]
Essandoh, Priscilla [1 ]
Agbogli, Hubert Kwame [1 ]
Asmah, Richard Harry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth & Allied Sci, Sch Basic & Biomed Sci, Dept Biomed Sci, Ho, Ghana
[2] Univ Hlth & Allied Sci, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Med Lab Sci, Ho, Ghana
[3] Amamorley Hlth Ctr, Ghana Hlth Serv, Ga North, Greater Accra, Ghana
[4] Ga North Municipal Hlth Directorate, Ghana Hlth Serv, Accra, Ghana
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
MICROSCOPY; STABILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0302840
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) kit is one of the techniques for diagnosing malaria. Due to its inherent advantages over the microscopy technique, several brands of the kit have flooded malaria endemic countries, without prior in-country evaluation. Two of such mRDT kits are Oscar (India) and Standard Q (Korea Republic). In this study, the performance of Oscar and Standard Q mRDT kits were compared to First Response (India) and CareStart (USA) mRDTs, which have been evaluated and deployed for use approved by the Ministry of Health (MOH). In this comparative study, whole blood samples were collected from patients suspected of malaria. Plasmodium falciparum was detected in each sample using nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), microscopy and the four mRDTs. The sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, positive and negative predictive values and accuracies of the mRDTs were determined using nPCR as a reference technique. Kappa statistic was used to determine the level of agreement among the techniques. Two hundred (200) blood samples were analyzed in this study. The overall detection rates of P. falciparum by microscopy, First Response, CareStart, Oscar-PfHRP2, Standard Q mRDT kits and nPCR were 31.5%, 34.5%, 33.5%, 32%, 31% and 43% (x2 = 6.1, p = 0.046), respectively. The accuracies of CareStart and First Response were comparable (90.5% vs. 89.5%). Further, comparing their sensitivities, Oscar-PfHRP2 was 74.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 63.9-83.2) while that of Standard Q was 72.1% (95% CI: 61.4-81.2), with comparable accuracies (Oscar-PfHRP2-89% and Standard Q -88%). Apart from First Response that was 98.3% specific, the others were 100% specific. Kappa test revealed perfect diagnostic agreement (kappa = 0.90-0.98) among the four mRDTs. That notwithstanding, Oscar-PfHRP2 agreed better with CareStart (kappa = 0.94) and First Response (kappa = 0.92) compared to the agreement between Standard Q and, CareStart (kappa = 0.92) and First Response (kappa = 0.90). Taken together, the diagnostic performance of the four mRDT kits were statistically similar. That notwithstanding, new mRDT kits should be evaluated prior to deployment for use.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A COMPARISON OF MICROSCOPY WITH RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR MALARIA IN RURAL GHANA
    Ansah, Evelyn K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2008, 79 (06): : 27 - 27
  • [32] AVAILABILITY AND USE OF MALARIA RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN HEALTH FACILITIES IN GOMOA WEST DISTRICT,GHANA
    Ayin, C. T.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A82 - A82
  • [33] A comparison of three diagnostic techniques for malaria:: a rapid diagnostic test (NOW® Malaria), PCR and microscopy
    Gatti, S.
    Gramegna, M.
    Bisoffi, Z.
    Raglio, A.
    Gulletta, M.
    Klersy, C.
    Bruno, A.
    Maserati, R.
    Madama, S.
    Scaglia, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PARASITOLOGY, 2007, 101 (03): : 195 - 204
  • [34] A global comparative evaluation of commercially available rapid diagnostic tests for visceral leishmaniasis
    Cunningham, J.
    Hasker, E.
    Das, P.
    El Safi, S.
    Goto, H.
    Mondal, D.
    Mbuchi, M.
    Mukhtar, M.
    Rabello, A.
    Rijal, S.
    Sundar, S.
    Menten, J.
    Peeling, R.
    Boelaert, M.
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2011, 16 : 180 - 180
  • [35] Evaluation of the Clearview® malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
    Sandrine Houzé
    Véronique Hubert
    Dorit Pessler Cohen
    Baruch Rivetz
    Jacques Le Bras
    [J]. Malaria Journal, 10
  • [36] Evaluation of the Clearview® malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
    Houze, Sandrine
    Hubert, Veronique
    Cohen, Dorit Pessler
    Rivetz, Baruch
    Le Bras, Jacques
    [J]. MALARIA JOURNAL, 2011, 10
  • [37] Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
    Abu Naser Mohon
    Rubayet Elahi
    Milka Patracia Podder
    Khaja Mohiuddin
    Mohammad Sharif Hossain
    Wasif A Khan
    Rashidul Haque
    Mohammad Shafiul Alam
    [J]. Malaria Journal, 11
  • [38] Field evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test (Parascreen™) for malaria diagnosis in the Peruvian Amazon
    Bendezu, Jorge
    Rosas, Angel
    Grande, Tanilu
    Rodriguez, Hugo
    Llanos-Cuentas, Alejandro
    Escobedo, Jorge
    Gamboa, Dionicia
    [J]. MALARIA JOURNAL, 2010, 9
  • [39] PROSPECTIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A COMBINED MALARIA/CRP RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TEST IN INDIA
    Incardona, Sandra
    Srivastava, Bina
    Sharma, Supriya
    Ongarello, Stefano
    Shenai, Shubhada
    Loganathan, Prabakaran
    Sarin, Sanjay
    Anvikar, Anupkumar R.
    Dittrich, Sabine
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2019, 101 : 380 - 380
  • [40] LABORATORY EVALUATION OF INTRODUCED PROCEDURAL ERRORS ON MALARIA RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TEST PERFORMANCE
    Carlson, Christina M.
    Ah, Yong
    Wilson, Scott
    Glenn, Jeffrey A.
    Aidoo, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2019, 101 : 275 - 275