Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic accuracies of four different malaria rapid diagnostic test kits available in Ghana

被引:0
|
作者
Aninagyei, Enoch [1 ]
Deku, John Gameli [2 ]
Yemofio, Keren Trishia [1 ]
Quainoo, Ekua [1 ]
Ntiri, Kofi Adjei [3 ]
Yaro, Evelyn [4 ]
Essandoh, Priscilla [1 ]
Agbogli, Hubert Kwame [1 ]
Asmah, Richard Harry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth & Allied Sci, Sch Basic & Biomed Sci, Dept Biomed Sci, Ho, Ghana
[2] Univ Hlth & Allied Sci, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Med Lab Sci, Ho, Ghana
[3] Amamorley Hlth Ctr, Ghana Hlth Serv, Ga North, Greater Accra, Ghana
[4] Ga North Municipal Hlth Directorate, Ghana Hlth Serv, Accra, Ghana
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
MICROSCOPY; STABILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0302840
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) kit is one of the techniques for diagnosing malaria. Due to its inherent advantages over the microscopy technique, several brands of the kit have flooded malaria endemic countries, without prior in-country evaluation. Two of such mRDT kits are Oscar (India) and Standard Q (Korea Republic). In this study, the performance of Oscar and Standard Q mRDT kits were compared to First Response (India) and CareStart (USA) mRDTs, which have been evaluated and deployed for use approved by the Ministry of Health (MOH). In this comparative study, whole blood samples were collected from patients suspected of malaria. Plasmodium falciparum was detected in each sample using nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), microscopy and the four mRDTs. The sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, positive and negative predictive values and accuracies of the mRDTs were determined using nPCR as a reference technique. Kappa statistic was used to determine the level of agreement among the techniques. Two hundred (200) blood samples were analyzed in this study. The overall detection rates of P. falciparum by microscopy, First Response, CareStart, Oscar-PfHRP2, Standard Q mRDT kits and nPCR were 31.5%, 34.5%, 33.5%, 32%, 31% and 43% (x2 = 6.1, p = 0.046), respectively. The accuracies of CareStart and First Response were comparable (90.5% vs. 89.5%). Further, comparing their sensitivities, Oscar-PfHRP2 was 74.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 63.9-83.2) while that of Standard Q was 72.1% (95% CI: 61.4-81.2), with comparable accuracies (Oscar-PfHRP2-89% and Standard Q -88%). Apart from First Response that was 98.3% specific, the others were 100% specific. Kappa test revealed perfect diagnostic agreement (kappa = 0.90-0.98) among the four mRDTs. That notwithstanding, Oscar-PfHRP2 agreed better with CareStart (kappa = 0.94) and First Response (kappa = 0.92) compared to the agreement between Standard Q and, CareStart (kappa = 0.92) and First Response (kappa = 0.90). Taken together, the diagnostic performance of the four mRDT kits were statistically similar. That notwithstanding, new mRDT kits should be evaluated prior to deployment for use.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Four Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits Used at the Enyiresi Government Hospital in the Eastern Region of Ghana
    Domfeh, Seth A.
    Darkwa, Boateng Y.
    Gablah, Raymond K.
    Adu-Asamoah, Evans
    Obirikorang, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 2023
  • [2] Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Diagnostic Kits Test for Diagnosis of Malaria
    Zafar, Muhammad Ahsan
    Khalid, Sidra
    Munir, Talha
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (10): : 2826 - 2828
  • [3] A comparative laboratory diagnosis of malaria:microscopy versus rapid diagnostic test kits
    Azikiwe CCA
    Ifezulike CC
    Siminialayi IM
    Amazu LU
    Enye JC
    Nwakwunite OE
    [J]. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2012, (04) : 307 - 310
  • [4] Diagnostic Performance of Three Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits for Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum
    Park, Seo Hye
    Jegal, Seung
    Ahn, Seong Kyu
    Jung, Haneul
    Lee, Jinyoung
    Na, Byoung-Kuk
    Hong, Sung-Jong
    Bahk, Young Yil
    Kim, Tong-Soo
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 2020, 58 (02): : 147 - 152
  • [5] Malaria rapid diagnostic test evaluation at private retail pharmacies in Kumasi, Ghana
    Audu, Rauf
    Anto, Berko Panyin
    Koffuor, George Asumeng
    Abruquah, Akua Afriyie
    Buabeng, Kwame Ohene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2016, 5 (03) : 175 - 180
  • [6] EVALUATION OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DIAGNOSTIC-TEST KITS FOR RUBELLA
    CASTELLANO, GA
    MADDEN, DL
    HAZZARD, GT
    CLEGHORN, CS
    VAILS, DV
    LEY, AC
    TZAN, NR
    SEVER, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1981, 143 (04): : 578 - 584
  • [7] Diagnostic ability of community health workers for malaria diagnosis in the field using different variants of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic test kits
    Singh, Mrigendra Pal
    Chand, Sunil Kumar
    Jaiswal, Arvind
    Savargaonkar, Deepali
    Anvikar, Anup R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VECTOR BORNE DISEASES, 2018, 55 (04) : 321 - 323
  • [8] Rapid diagnostic test kits for influenza
    Hurt, Aeron
    Barr, Ian
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 2006, 27 (02) : 61 - 63
  • [9] Examine the Diagnostic Evaluation of Rapid Diagnostic Test for Diagnosing Malaria in Children
    Shamim, Sajid
    Farhat, Anila
    Khyalmuhammad
    Sultan, Allah Nawaz
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (04): : 1345 - 1347
  • [10] A Comparative Analysis of Four Different Diagnostic Techniques for Malaria
    Sharma, Chaitali
    Umesh
    Rawat, Vinita
    Singh, Rajesh Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (11) : DC21 - DC24