Strategies for genomic predictions of an indicine multi-breed population using single-step GBLUP

被引:0
|
作者
Londono-Gil, Marisol [1 ,2 ]
Lopez-Correa, Rodrigo [3 ]
Aguilar, Ignacio [4 ]
Magnabosco, Claudio Ulhoa [5 ]
Hidalgo, Jorge [2 ]
Bussiman, Fernando [2 ]
Baldi, Fernando [1 ]
Lourenco, Daniela [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane S-N, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Republica, Fac Vet, Dept Genet & Mejoramiento Anim, Montevideo, Uruguay
[4] Inst Nacl Invest Agr INIA, Montevideo, Uruguay
[5] Embrapa Cerrados, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
beef cattle; compatibility; LR method; metafounders; reference population; FULL PEDIGREE; CATTLE; METAFOUNDERS; BLUP;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12882
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Brazilian livestock breeding programmes strive to enhance the genetics of beef cattle, with a strong emphasis on the Nellore breed, which has an extensive database and has achieved significant genetic progress in the last years. There are other indicine breeds that are economically important in Brazil; however, these breeds have more modest sets of phenotypes, pedigree and genotypes, slowing down their genetic progress as their predictions are less accurate. Combining several breeds in a multi-breed evaluation could help enhance predictions for those breeds with less information available. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of multi-breed, single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor genomic evaluations for Nellore, Brahman, Guzerat and Tabapua. Multi-breed evaluations were contrasted to the single-breed ones. Data were sourced from the National Association of Breeders and Researchers of Brazil and included pedigree (4,207,516), phenotypic (328,748), and genomic (63,492) information across all breeds. Phenotypes were available for adjusted weight at 210 and 450 days of age, and scrotal circumference at 365 days of age. Various scenarios were evaluated to ensure pedigree and genomic information compatibility when combining different breeds, including metafounders (MF) or building the genomic relationship matrix with breed-specific allele frequencies. Scenarios were compared using the linear regression method for bias, dispersion and accuracy. The results showed that using multi-breed evaluations significantly improved accuracy, especially for smaller breeds like Guzerat and Tabapua. The validation statistics indicated that the MF approach provided accurate predictions, albeit with some bias. While single-breed evaluations tended to have lower accuracy, merging all breeds in multi-breed evaluations increased accuracy and reduced dispersion. This study demonstrates that multi-breed genomic evaluations are proper for indicine beef cattle breeds. The MF approach may be particularly beneficial for less-represented breeds, addressing limitations related to small reference populations and incompatibilities between G and A22. By leveraging genomic information across breeds, breeders and producers can make more informed selection decisions, ultimately improving genetic gain in these cattle populations.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 56
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Single-Breed and Multi-Breed Training Populations for Infrared Predictions of Novel Phenotypes in Holstein Cows
    Mota, Lucio Flavio Macedo
    Pegolo, Sara
    Baba, Toshimi
    Morota, Gota
    Penagaricano, Francisco
    Bittante, Giovanni
    Cecchinato, Alessio
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [32] Population structure and breed composition prediction in a multi-breed sheep population using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes
    O'Brien, A. C.
    Purfield, D. C.
    Judge, M. M.
    Long, C.
    Fair, S.
    Berry, D. P.
    ANIMAL, 2020, 14 (03) : 464 - 474
  • [33] Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure
    Simeone, R.
    Misztal, I.
    Aguilar, I.
    Vitezica, Z. G.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2012, 129 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [34] Additional considerations to the use of single-step genomic predictions in a dominance setting
    Mota, Rodrigo R.
    Vanderick, Sylvie
    Colinet, Frederic G.
    Hammami, Hedi
    Wiggans, George R.
    Gengler, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2019, 136 (06) : 430 - 440
  • [35] Identification of genomic regions related to age at first calving and first calving interval in water buffalo using single-step GBLUP
    de Araujo Neto, Francisco Ribeiro
    Takada, Luciana
    dos Santos, Daniel Jordan Abreu
    Aspilcueta-Borquis, Rusbel Raul
    Cardoso, Diercles Francisco
    do Nascimento, Andre Vieira
    Leao, Karen Martins
    de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes
    Tonhati, Humberto
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2020, 55 (11) : 1565 - 1572
  • [36] Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population
    Céline Carillier
    Hélène Larroque
    Christèle Robert-Granié
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 46
  • [37] Sequence variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS can improve the reliability of genomic predictions in dairy cattle
    van den Berg, Irene
    Boichard, Didier
    Lund, Mogens S.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2016, 48 : 1 - 18
  • [38] Accuracy of estimated genomic breeding values for wool and meat traits in a multi-breed sheep population
    Daetwyler, H. D.
    Hickey, J. M.
    Henshall, J. M.
    Dominik, S.
    Gredler, B.
    van der Werf, J. H. J.
    Hayes, B. J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2010, 50 (11-12) : 1004 - 1010
  • [39] Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population
    Hoze, C.
    Fritz, S.
    Phocas, F.
    Boichard, D.
    Ducrocq, V.
    Croiseau, P.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (06) : 3918 - 3929
  • [40] Accuracy of genomic selection for age at puberty in a multi-breed population of tropically adapted beef cattle
    Farah, M. M.
    Swan, A. A.
    Fortes, M. R. S.
    Fonseca, R.
    Moore, S. S.
    Kelly, M. J.
    ANIMAL GENETICS, 2016, 47 (01) : 3 - 11