Ordinal Outcome State-Space Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data

被引:0
|
作者
Henry, Teague R. [1 ,2 ]
Slipetz, Lindley R. [1 ]
Falk, Ami [1 ]
Qiu, Jiaxing [2 ]
Chen, Meng [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Data Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
state-space modeling; intensive longitudinal data; ecological momentary assessment; ordinal measurements; item response theory; particle filtering; PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES; INFERENCE; SCHIZOPHRENIA;
D O I
10.1007/s11336-024-09984-3
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Intensive longitudinal (IL) data are increasingly prevalent in psychological science, coinciding with technological advancements that make it simple to deploy study designs such as daily diary and ecological momentary assessments. IL data are characterized by a rapid rate of data collection (1+ collections per day), over a period of time, allowing for the capture of the dynamics that underlie psychological and behavioral processes. One powerful framework for analyzing IL data is state-space modeling, where observed variables are considered measurements for underlying states (i.e., latent variables) that change together over time. However, state-space modeling has typically relied on continuous measurements, whereas psychological data often come in the form of ordinal measurements such as Likert scale items. In this manuscript, we develop a general estimation approach for state-space models with ordinal measurements, specifically focusing on a graded response model for Likert scale items. We evaluate the performance of our model and estimator against that of the commonly used "linear approximation" model, which treats ordinal measurements as though they are continuous. We find that our model resulted in unbiased estimates of the state dynamics, while the linear approximation resulted in strongly biased estimates of the state dynamics. Finally, we develop an approximate standard error, termed slice standard errors and show that these approximate standard errors are more liberal than true standard errors (i.e., smaller) at a consistent bias.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1229
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DISTURBANCE SMOOTHER FOR STATE-SPACE MODELS
    KOOPMAN, SJ
    BIOMETRIKA, 1993, 80 (01) : 117 - 126
  • [22] State-space estimation with uncertain models
    Sayed, AH
    Subramanian, A
    TOTAL LEAST SQUARES AND ERRORS-IN-VARIABLES MODELING: ANALYSIS, ALGORITHMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, : 191 - 202
  • [23] Identification of structured state-space models
    Yu, Chengpu
    Ljung, Lennart
    Verhaegen, Michel
    AUTOMATICA, 2018, 90 : 54 - 61
  • [24] Approximate Methods for State-Space Models
    Koyama, Shinsuke
    Perez-Bolde, Lucia Castellanos
    Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla
    Kass, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (489) : 170 - 180
  • [25] State-space models for control and identification
    Raynaud, HF
    Kulcsár, C
    Hammi, R
    ADVANCES IN COMMUNICATION CONTROL NETWORKS, 2005, 308 : 177 - 197
  • [26] Smoothing algorithms for state-space models
    Briers, Mark
    Doucet, Arnaud
    Maskell, Simon
    ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 2010, 62 (01) : 61 - 89
  • [27] Models for intensive longitudinal data
    van Montfort, Kees
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2007, 72 (03) : 451 - 454
  • [28] Models for intensive longitudinal data
    Ballinger, Gary A.
    ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 11 (02) : 412 - 414
  • [29] Models for intensive longitudinal data
    Kees van Montfort
    Psychometrika, 2007, 72 : 451 - 454
  • [30] A state-space model for univariate ordinal-valued time series
    Rizzardi, Mark
    NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2008, 21 (02) : 314 - 329