Screening for Breast Cancer: A Comparative Review of Guidelines

被引:5
|
作者
Katsika, Laskarina [1 ]
Boureka, Eirini [2 ]
Kalogiannidis, Ioannis [2 ]
Tsakiridis, Ioannis [2 ]
Tirodimos, Ilias [1 ]
Lallas, Konstantinos [3 ]
Tsimtsiou, Zoi [1 ]
Dagklis, Themistoklis [2 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Lab Hyg Social & Prevent Med & Med Stat, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 3, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Dept Med Oncol, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
LIFE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; screening; guidelines; comparison; AVERAGE-RISK; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; US; ULTRASOUND; BENEFITS; TRIAL; HARMS; RECOMMENDATIONS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.3390/life14060777
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in the female population worldwide and the leading cause of death among perimenopausal women. Screening is essential, since earlier detection in combination with improvements in breast cancer treatment can reduce the associated mortality. The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from published guidelines on breast cancer screening. A total of 14 guidelines on breast cancer screening issued between 2014 and 2022 were identified. A descriptive review of relevant guidelines by the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), the American Cancer Society (ACS), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS), the American College of Radiology (ACR), the Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC), the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) and the Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology (JJCO) for women both at average and high-risk was carried out. There is a consensus among all the reviewed guidelines that mammography is the gold standard screening modality for average-risk women. For this risk group, most of the guidelines suggest annual or biennial mammographic screening at 40-74 years, while screening should particularly focus at 50-69 years. Most of the guidelines suggest that the age limit to stop screening should be determined based on the women's health status and life expectancy. For women at high-risk, most guidelines recommend the use of annual mammography or magnetic resonance imaging, while the starting age should be earlier than the average-risk group, depending on the risk factor. There is discrepancy among the recommendations regarding the age at onset of screening in the various high-risk categories. The development of consistent international practice protocols for the most appropriate breast cancer screening programs seems of major importance to reduce mortality rates and safely guide everyday clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
    Kopatsaris, Stergios
    Tsakiridis, Ioannis
    Kapetanios, Georgios
    Zachomitros, Fotios
    Michos, Georgios
    Papanikolaou, Evangelos
    Athanasiadis, Apostolos
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [32] Review on adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe
    Neamtiu, L.
    Pylkkanen, L.
    Freeman, C.
    Parkinson, Z. Saz
    Deandrea, S.
    Tekin, A. Uluturk
    Dimitrova, N.
    Lerda, D.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [33] Breast cancer screening in Canada: A review
    Wadden, N
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2005, 56 (05): : 271 - 275
  • [34] Mammographic screening for breast cancer: A review
    Lee, Warwick
    Peters, Gudrun
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2013, 60 (01): : 35 - 39
  • [35] Screening for breast cancer in England: a review
    Hogben, Rosalyn Katy F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 20 (06) : 545 - 549
  • [36] SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER - A REVIEW
    MILLER, AB
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 24 (01): : 49 - 53
  • [37] Racial Disparities Persist in Cancer Screening: New USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Illuminate Inadequate Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Women
    Christine E. Edmonds
    Samantha P. Zuckerman
    Carmen E. Guerra
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2022, 37 : 1534 - 1536
  • [38] Racial Disparities Persist in Cancer Screening: New USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Illuminate Inadequate Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Women
    Edmonds, Christine E.
    Zuckerman, Samantha P.
    Guerra, Carmen E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (06) : 1534 - 1536
  • [39] American cancer society guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003
    Smith, RA
    Saslow, D
    Sawyer, KA
    Burke, W
    Costanza, ME
    Evans, WP
    Foster, RS
    Hendrick, E
    Eyre, HJ
    Sener, S
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2003, 53 (03) : 141 - 169
  • [40] Screening and Referral of Diabetic Retinopathy A Comparative Review of the Practice Guidelines
    Wan, Kelvin Ho-Nam
    Chen, Li Jia
    Young, Alvin L.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 2 (05): : 310 - 316