Costs and Consequences of a Novel Emergency Department Sepsis Diagnostic Test: The IntelliSep Index

被引:4
|
作者
Hollenbeak, Christopher S. [1 ]
Henning, Daniel J. [2 ]
Geeting, Glenn K. [3 ]
Ledeboer, Nathan A. [4 ]
Faruqi, Imran A. [5 ]
Pierce, Christi G. [6 ]
Thomas, Christopher B. [5 ]
O'Neal, Hollis R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Emergency Med, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Grant Mem Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Petersburg, WV USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Clin Microbiol & Mol Diagnost, Milwaukee, WI USA
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Clin Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[6] Our Lady Lake Reg Med Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA USA
关键词
decision analysis; emergency department; healthcare costs; sepsis; PROCALCITONIN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/CCE.0000000000000942
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES:Sepsis causes 270,000 deaths and costs $38 billion annually in the United States. Most cases of sepsis present in the emergency department (ED), where rapid diagnosis remains challenging. The IntelliSep Index (ISI) is a novel diagnostic test that analyzes characteristics of WBC structure and provides a reliable early signal for sepsis. This study performs a cost-consequence analysis of the ISI relative to procalcitonin for early sepsis diagnosis in the ED.PERSPECTIVE:U.S. healthcare system.SETTING:Community hospital ED.METHODS:A decision tree analysis was performed comparing ISI with procalcitonin. Model parameters included prevalence of sepsis, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests (both ISI and procalcitonin), costs of hospitalization, and mortality rate stratified by diagnostic test result. Mortality and prevalence of sepsis were estimated from best available literature. Costs were estimated based on an analysis of a large, national discharge dataset, and adjusted to 2018 U.S. dollars. Outcomes included expected costs and survival.RESULTS:Assuming a confirmed sepsis prevalence of 16.9% (adjudicated to Sepsis-3), the ISI strategy had an expected cost per patient of $3,849 and expected survival rate of 95.08%, whereas the procalcitonin strategy had an expected cost of $4,656 per patient and an expected survival of 94.98%. ISI was both less costly and more effective than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses.CONCLUSIONS:ISI was both less costly and more effective in preventing mortality than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. The ISI may provide health systems with a higher-value diagnostic test in ED sepsis evaluation. Additional work is needed to validate these results in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of a Novel, Rapid Sepsis Diagnostic for Emergency Department Use
    O'Neal, Jr Hollis R.
    Sheybani, Roya
    Janz, David R.
    Scoggins, Robert
    Jagneaux, Tonya
    Walker, James E.
    Henning, Daniel J.
    Rosenman, Elizabeth
    Mahler, Simon A.
    Regunath, Hariharan
    Sampson, Christopher S.
    Files, D. Clark
    Fremont, Richard D.
    Noto, Michael J.
    Schneider, Erica E.
    Shealey, Wesley R.
    Berlinger, Matthew S.
    Carver, Thomas C.
    Walker, Morgan K.
    Ledeboer, Nathan A.
    Shah, Ajay M.
    Tse, Henry T. K.
    DiCarlo, Dino
    Rice, Todd W.
    Thomas, Christopher B.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2024, 6 (02)
  • [2] Diagnostic markers of sepsis in the emergency department
    Spapen, H. D.
    Hachimi-Idrissi, S.
    Corne, L.
    Huyghens, L. P.
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2006, 61 (03) : 138 - 142
  • [3] Independent Validation of Sepsis Index for Sepsis Screening in the Emergency Department
    Agnello, Luisa
    Iacona, Alessandro
    Maestri, Salvatore
    Lo Sasso, Bruna
    Giglio, Rosaria Vincenza
    Mancuso, Silvia
    Ciaccio, Anna Maria
    Vidali, Matteo
    Ciaccio, Marcello
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (07)
  • [4] A novel biomarker panel with a Multimarker Index value for the diagnosis of sepsis in the Emergency Department
    E Rivers
    N Shapiro
    JE Hollander
    R Birkhahn
    R Otero
    T Osborn
    D Milzman
    E Moretti
    B Nguyen
    S Trzeciak
    K Gunnerson
    [J]. Critical Care, 10 (Suppl 1):
  • [5] Diagnostic Accuracy of CD64 for Sepsis in Emergency Department
    Dal Ponte, Silvana Teixeira
    Alegretti, Ana Paula
    Pilger, Diogo Andre
    Rezende, Gabriela Petitot
    Andrioli, Giordanna
    Ludwig, Helena Cocolichio
    Diogo, Luciano
    Goldani, Luciano Zubaran
    Loreto, Melina
    Machado, Pauline Simas
    Seligman, Renato
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 10 (02) : 42 - 46
  • [6] Diagnostic value and prognostic evaluation of Presepsin for sepsis in an emergency department
    Bo Liu
    Yun-Xia Chen
    Qin Yin
    Yun-Zhou Zhao
    Chun-Sheng Li
    [J]. Critical Care, 17
  • [7] Diagnostic value and prognostic evaluation of Presepsin for sepsis in an emergency department
    Liu, Bo
    Chen, Yun-Xia
    Yin, Qin
    Zhao, Yun-Zhou
    Li, Chun-Sheng
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (05)
  • [8] Shock Index and Early Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Pilot Study
    Berger, Tony
    Green, Jeffrey
    Horeczko, Timothy
    Hagar, Yolanda
    Garg, Nidhi
    Suarez, Alison
    Panacek, Edward
    Shapiro, Nathan
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [9] Emergency Severity Index as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department
    Phungoen, Pariwat
    Khemtong, Sukanya
    Apiratwarakul, Korakot
    Ienghong, Kamonwon
    Kotruchin, Praew
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (09): : 1854 - 1859
  • [10] Diagnostic and prognostic utility of presepsin for sepsis in very elderly patients in the emergency department
    Ruangsomboon, Onlak
    Panjaikaew, Phantakarn
    Monsomboon, Apichaya
    Chakorn, Tipa
    Permpikul, Chairat
    Limsuwat, Chok
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2020, 510 : 723 - 732