Systematic review of software engineering uses of multi-criteria decision-making methods: Trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, recommendations, and future directions

被引:3
|
作者
Magabaleh, Aws A. [1 ,2 ]
Ghraibeh, Lana L. [1 ]
Audeh, Afnan Y. [1 ]
Albahri, A. S. [3 ,4 ]
Deveci, Muhammet [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Antucheviciene, Jurgita [8 ]
机构
[1] Yarmouk Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Comp Sci, Dept Informat Syst, Irbid, Jordan
[2] Prince Sultan Univ, Dept Software Engn, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Iraqi Commiss Comp & Informat ICCI, Baghdad, Iraq
[4] Imam Jaafar Al Sadiq Univ, Tech Coll, Baghdad, Iraq
[5] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Naval Acad, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34942 Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] UCL, Bartlett Sch Sustainable Construct, London WC1E 6BT, England
[7] Lebanese Amer Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Byblos, Lebanon
[8] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Management & Real Estate, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
MCDM; Software engineering; SDLC; Software development life cycle; Systematic literature review (SLR); ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PROJECT-MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; TOPSIS; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111859
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Correctly adhering to the processes within the software development life cycle (SDLC), from analysis and design to coding and testing, is vital for ensuring the successful and efficient creation of high-quality software applications. These structured phases provide a systematic approach to software development, facilitating clear communication, reducing errors, and improving collaboration among development teams. For the proper and correct use of SDLC processes, it is essential for both software engineers and software decision makers to perform the correct and needed actions while performing each software process, and one method of facilitating that is multicriteria decision making (MCDM). This study aims to provide a systematic review of the use of MCDM within the field of software engineering (SE), encompassing methodologies such as fuzzy MCDM, AHP, TOPSIS, DEMATEL, and other methods, with a deliberate focus on software engineering development processes. To ensure the high quality of this review, a methodical and structured literature search process was performed with strict selection criteria, resulting in the identification of 32 contributions on the applications of MCDM in SE from various databases, including Scopus, ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore digital library (IEEE), and Web of Science (WOS). The selected papers were taxonomized into seven main categories, with some divided into subcategories. This paper presents a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the aforementioned studies, investigating the challenges, motivations, and recommendations found within each, thereby paving the way for potential future research. Bibliometric analysis is also provided to show concise quantitative analysis of related bibliographic information, which draws several key insights into publication trends. Finally, a critical analysis of the current literature and existing research is presented, while also addressing relevant research gaps.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [42] Group Decision-Making Using Improved Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Credit Risk Analysis
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    FILOMAT, 2016, 30 (15) : 4135 - 4150
  • [43] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [44] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Erkan Celik
    Muhammet Gul
    Melih Yucesan
    Suleyman Mete
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8
  • [45] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [46] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [47] Vague Set Methods of Multi-criteria Fuzzy Decision-making
    Yan, Ruixia
    Zheng, Jianguo
    Wang, Xiang
    2010 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2010, : 658 - 661
  • [48] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment
    Alghamdi, M. A.
    Alshehri, Noura Omair
    Akram, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (06) : 2057 - 2064
  • [49] APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS IN DESTINATION BENCHMARKING
    Lusticky, Martin
    Vachova, Lucie
    Kaderabkova, Jaroslava
    15TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2012, : 379 - 387
  • [50] Multi-criteria decision-making methods: application in humanitarian operations
    Nain, Aniruddh
    Jain, Deepika
    Trivedi, Ashish
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (06) : 2090 - 2128