Systematic review of software engineering uses of multi-criteria decision-making methods: Trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, recommendations, and future directions

被引:3
|
作者
Magabaleh, Aws A. [1 ,2 ]
Ghraibeh, Lana L. [1 ]
Audeh, Afnan Y. [1 ]
Albahri, A. S. [3 ,4 ]
Deveci, Muhammet [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Antucheviciene, Jurgita [8 ]
机构
[1] Yarmouk Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Comp Sci, Dept Informat Syst, Irbid, Jordan
[2] Prince Sultan Univ, Dept Software Engn, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Iraqi Commiss Comp & Informat ICCI, Baghdad, Iraq
[4] Imam Jaafar Al Sadiq Univ, Tech Coll, Baghdad, Iraq
[5] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Naval Acad, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34942 Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] UCL, Bartlett Sch Sustainable Construct, London WC1E 6BT, England
[7] Lebanese Amer Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Byblos, Lebanon
[8] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Management & Real Estate, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
MCDM; Software engineering; SDLC; Software development life cycle; Systematic literature review (SLR); ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PROJECT-MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; TOPSIS; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111859
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Correctly adhering to the processes within the software development life cycle (SDLC), from analysis and design to coding and testing, is vital for ensuring the successful and efficient creation of high-quality software applications. These structured phases provide a systematic approach to software development, facilitating clear communication, reducing errors, and improving collaboration among development teams. For the proper and correct use of SDLC processes, it is essential for both software engineers and software decision makers to perform the correct and needed actions while performing each software process, and one method of facilitating that is multicriteria decision making (MCDM). This study aims to provide a systematic review of the use of MCDM within the field of software engineering (SE), encompassing methodologies such as fuzzy MCDM, AHP, TOPSIS, DEMATEL, and other methods, with a deliberate focus on software engineering development processes. To ensure the high quality of this review, a methodical and structured literature search process was performed with strict selection criteria, resulting in the identification of 32 contributions on the applications of MCDM in SE from various databases, including Scopus, ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore digital library (IEEE), and Web of Science (WOS). The selected papers were taxonomized into seven main categories, with some divided into subcategories. This paper presents a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the aforementioned studies, investigating the challenges, motivations, and recommendations found within each, thereby paving the way for potential future research. Bibliometric analysis is also provided to show concise quantitative analysis of related bibliographic information, which draws several key insights into publication trends. Finally, a critical analysis of the current literature and existing research is presented, while also addressing relevant research gaps.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Engineering Applications
    Nabavi, Seyed Reza
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 62 (17) : 6707 - 6722
  • [2] METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) FOR HEALTH POLICY DECISION-MAKING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Wahlster, P.
    Goetghebeur, M. M.
    Kriza, C.
    Niederlaender, C. S.
    Kolominsky-Rabas, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A454 - A454
  • [3] The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions
    Kandakoglu, M.
    Walther, G.
    Ben Amor, S.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 332 (1-3) : 807 - 830
  • [4] The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions
    M. Kandakoglu
    G. Walther
    S. Ben Amor
    Annals of Operations Research, 2024, 332 : 807 - 830
  • [5] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [6] Dust mitigation methods and multi-criteria decision-making cleaning strategies for photovoltaic systems: Advances, challenges, and future directions
    Gandomzadeh, M.
    Yaghoubi, A. A.
    Hoorsun, A.
    Parsay, A.
    Gholami, A.
    Zandi, M.
    Gavagsaz-Ghoachani, R.
    Kazem, H. A.
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2025, 57
  • [7] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems
    Scott, James A.
    Ho, William
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [8] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
    Kabir, Golam
    Sadiq, Rehan
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (09) : 1176 - 1210
  • [9] Wastewater Treatment and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Review
    Sharma, Tina
    Kumar, Anuj
    Pant, Sangeeta
    Kotecha, Ketan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 143704 - 143720
  • [10] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Case of Software Vendor Selection
    Rani, Anshul
    Mishra, Deepti
    Omerovic, Aida
    TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2024, 13 (02): : 1218 - 1229