Integrated Assessment of Methane Production from the Co-Digestion of Swine Wastewater and Other Organic Wastes

被引:0
|
作者
de Paula Sousa, Izabelle [1 ]
Rosa, Andre Pereira [1 ]
Almeida, Guilherme Kurtemback [1 ]
Rocha, Dilson Novais [1 ]
de Alencar Neves, Thiago [2 ]
Borges, Alisson Carraro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Agr Engn, BR-36571900 Vicosa, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Sanit & Environm Engn, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
anaerobic digestion; food waste; poultry litter; grass residue; methane production; FOOD WASTE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; POULTRY LITTER; GRASS-SILAGE; PIG MANURE; BIOGAS; BATCH; COSUBSTRATE; MICROALGAE; CATTLE;
D O I
10.3390/su16145938
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study aimed to evaluate and compare the co-digestion of swine wastewater (SW) and other co-substrates: grass residue (GR), food waste (FW), and poultry litter (PL). The comparisons were performed using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. The maximum accumulated methane (CH4) production was submitted to a joint analysis of variance. Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05) was used to compare the results of the treatments, and Dunnett's test (alpha = 0.05) was used to compare the ratios (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100) (based on volatile solids-VS). In addition, both the synergistic effect and kinetic adjustment of some models were evaluated. The results indicated that the co-digestion of all substrates (GR, FW, and PL) with SW improved the methane production yield in comparison with mono-digestion (GR, FW, and PL). A positive synergistic effect was observed for the FW:SW (25:75 and 75:25). According to both Tukey's and Dunnett's tests (alpha = 0.05), the FW:SW ratio of 25:75 did not show statistical difference compared with the mono-digestion (SW), which exhibited the largest CH4 production. Among the models evaluated, the modified Gompertz function presented the best fit. For the co-digestion treatments, the ratio of FW:SW of 25:75 exhibited the most promising potential for integrated management, demonstrating the best synergistic effect among the substrates. In this context, methane production from co-digestion equalled that of mono-digestion, while enabling integrated residue management.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhanced Biogas Production from Agro Wastes by Co-digestion with Crude Glycerol
    Kamarudin, Siti Kartom
    al Muniandy, Anitha
    Shamsul, Noor Shahirah
    Kofli, Hisham Tan
    [J]. JURNAL KEJURUTERAAN, 2018, 1 (01): : 47 - 57
  • [42] Biogas production from the liquid waste of distilled gin production: Optimization of UASB reactor performance with increasing organic loading rate for co-digestion with swine wastewater
    Montes, Jesus A.
    Leivas, Ruben
    Martinez-Prieto, David
    Rico, Carlos
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 274 : 43 - 47
  • [43] Methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with fruit and vegetable wastes: effect of mixing ratio and inoculum type
    Elsayed, Mahmoud
    Diab, Asmaa
    Soliman, Mohamed
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2021, 11 (03) : 989 - 998
  • [44] Methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with fruit and vegetable wastes: effect of mixing ratio and inoculum type
    Mahmoud Elsayed
    Asmaa Diab
    Mohamed Soliman
    [J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2021, 11 : 989 - 998
  • [45] Co-digestion of Rhodosporidium toruloides biorefinery wastes for biogas production
    Marques, Isabel Paula
    Batista, Ana Paula
    Coelho, Aldo
    da Silva, Teresa Lopes
    [J]. PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2018, 64 : 221 - 227
  • [46] Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal organic wastes and pre-treatment to enhance biogas production from waste
    Li, Chenxi
    Champagne, Pascale
    Anderson, Bruce C.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 69 (02) : 443 - 450
  • [47] Unlocking potential: Exploring the methane production potential in anaerobic co-digestion of cassava wastewater and glycerol
    Devens, Kauanna Uyara
    Ribeiro, Alexandre Rodrigues
    Camargo, Franciele Pereira
    Sakamoto, Isabel Kimiko
    Varesche, Maria Bernadete Amancio
    Silva, Edson Luiz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (03):
  • [48] Concomitant hydrogen and butanol production via co-digestion of organic wastewater and nitrogenous residues
    Singh, Vaishali
    Yadav, Santoshnambi
    Sen, Ramkrishna
    Das, Debabrata
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (46) : 24477 - 24490
  • [49] Tannery wastewater as nutrient supply in production of biogas from solid tannery wastes mixed through anaerobic co-digestion
    Agustini, Caroline Borges
    da Costa, Marisa
    Gutterres, Mariliz
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2020, 135 (38-45) : 38 - 45
  • [50] Optimizing feedstock mixtures of livestock farming wastes to enhance methane yield in biogas production by co-digestion
    Alejandro Uranga-Soto, Manuel
    Benigno Valdez-Torres, Jose
    Alonzo Baez-Sanudo, Manuel
    Basilio Heredia, Jose
    Humberto Siller-Cepeda, Jorge
    Dolores Muy-Rangel, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 10 (05)