Integrated Assessment of Methane Production from the Co-Digestion of Swine Wastewater and Other Organic Wastes

被引:0
|
作者
de Paula Sousa, Izabelle [1 ]
Rosa, Andre Pereira [1 ]
Almeida, Guilherme Kurtemback [1 ]
Rocha, Dilson Novais [1 ]
de Alencar Neves, Thiago [2 ]
Borges, Alisson Carraro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Agr Engn, BR-36571900 Vicosa, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Sanit & Environm Engn, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
anaerobic digestion; food waste; poultry litter; grass residue; methane production; FOOD WASTE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; POULTRY LITTER; GRASS-SILAGE; PIG MANURE; BIOGAS; BATCH; COSUBSTRATE; MICROALGAE; CATTLE;
D O I
10.3390/su16145938
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study aimed to evaluate and compare the co-digestion of swine wastewater (SW) and other co-substrates: grass residue (GR), food waste (FW), and poultry litter (PL). The comparisons were performed using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. The maximum accumulated methane (CH4) production was submitted to a joint analysis of variance. Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05) was used to compare the results of the treatments, and Dunnett's test (alpha = 0.05) was used to compare the ratios (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100) (based on volatile solids-VS). In addition, both the synergistic effect and kinetic adjustment of some models were evaluated. The results indicated that the co-digestion of all substrates (GR, FW, and PL) with SW improved the methane production yield in comparison with mono-digestion (GR, FW, and PL). A positive synergistic effect was observed for the FW:SW (25:75 and 75:25). According to both Tukey's and Dunnett's tests (alpha = 0.05), the FW:SW ratio of 25:75 did not show statistical difference compared with the mono-digestion (SW), which exhibited the largest CH4 production. Among the models evaluated, the modified Gompertz function presented the best fit. For the co-digestion treatments, the ratio of FW:SW of 25:75 exhibited the most promising potential for integrated management, demonstrating the best synergistic effect among the substrates. In this context, methane production from co-digestion equalled that of mono-digestion, while enabling integrated residue management.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potential for methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with winery wastewater
    Riano, B.
    Molinuevo, B.
    Garcia-Gonzalez, M. C.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (05) : 4131 - 4136
  • [2] Enhanced bio-methane production from co-digestion of different organic wastes
    Esposito, Giovanni
    Frunzo, Luigi
    Panico, Antonio
    Pirozzi, Francesco
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 33 (24) : 2733 - 2740
  • [3] Evaluation of methane production by anaerobic co-digestion of wastes
    Malinowsky, Carina
    Cardoso, Thaianna
    Bonatto, Isabela
    Vieira, Lorena R.
    Casarin, Marco Antonio
    Poletto, Luiza D.
    Silva, Jonathan
    de Castilhos Junior, Armando Borges
    [J]. IX CONGRESO IBERICO DE AGROINGENIERIA - LIBROS DE ACTAS, 2018, : 789 - 794
  • [4] Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes
    Abouelenien, Fatma
    Namba, Yuzaburo
    Kosseva, Maria R.
    Nishio, Naomichi
    Nakashimada, Yutaka
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 159 : 80 - 87
  • [5] Bio-electrochemically hydrogen and methane production from co-digestion of wastes
    Prajapati, Kalp Bhusan
    Singh, Rajesh
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 198
  • [6] Stabilization of microbial network by co-digestion of swine manure and organic wastes
    Zhao, Xin
    Hong, Jin-Kyung
    Park, So Yun
    Yun, Jinhyeon
    Jho, Eun Hea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 355
  • [7] Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes
    Esposito, G.
    Frunzo, L.
    Giordano, A.
    Liotta, F.
    Panico, A.
    Pirozzi, F.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 11 (04) : 325 - 341
  • [8] Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes
    G. Esposito
    L. Frunzo
    A. Giordano
    F. Liotta
    A. Panico
    F. Pirozzi
    [J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2012, 11 : 325 - 341
  • [9] A review of the co-digestion of different organic wastes in biogas production
    Thiruvengadam, S.
    Kamalesh, R.
    Narayanan, Gokula S.
    Sankar, M.
    [J]. RESEARCH JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 17 (02): : 158 - 172
  • [10] Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: Enhanced and Sustainable Methane Production from Co-Digestion of Food and Lignocellulosic Wastes
    David, Aditi
    Govil, Tanvi
    Tripathi, Abhilash Kumar
    McGeary, Julie
    Farrar, Kylie
    Sani, Rajesh Kumar
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (08):