Recent trends in 3D bioprinting technology for skeletal muscle regeneration

被引:1
|
作者
Sabetkish, Shabnam [1 ,3 ]
Currie, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Meagher, Laurence [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Australian Regenerat Med Inst, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, ARC Training Ctr Cell & Tissue Engn Technol, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Bioprinting; Muscle; Regeneration; Hydrogels; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; MYOGENIC CELLS; TISSUE; HYDROGELS; SCAFFOLD; DIFFERENTIATION; CONSTRUCTS; FABRICATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2024.04.038
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Skeletal muscle is a pro-regenerative tissue, that utilizes a tissue-resident stem cell system to effect repair upon injury. Despite the demonstrated efficiency of this system in restoring muscle mass after many acute injuries, in conditions of severe trauma such as those evident in volumetric muscle loss (VML) (> 20 % by mass), this self-repair capability is unable to restore tissue architecture, requiring interventions which currently are largely surgical. As a possible alternative, the generation of artificial muscle using tissue engineering approaches may also be of importance in the treatment of VML and muscle diseases such as dystrophies. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has been identified as a promising technique for regeneration of the complex architecture of skeletal muscle. This review discusses existing treatment strategies following muscle damage, recent progress in bioprinting techniques, the bioinks used for muscle regeneration, the immunogenicity of scaffold materials, and in vitro and in vivo maturation techniques for 3D bio-printed muscle constructs. The pros and cons of these bioink formulations are also highlighted. Finally, we present the current limitations and challenges in the field and critical factors to consider for bioprinting approaches to become more translationa and to produce clinically relevant engineered muscle. Statement of significance This review discusses the physiopathology of muscle injuries and existing clinical treatment strategies for muscle damage, the types of bioprinting techniques that have been applied to bioprinting of muscle, and the bioinks commonly used for muscle regeneration. The pros and cons of these bioinks are highlighted. We present a discussion of existing gaps in the literature and critical factors to consider for the translation of bioprinting approaches and to produce clinically relevant engineered muscle. Finally, we provide insights into what we believe will be the next steps required before the realization of the application of tissue-engineered muscle in humans. We believe this manuscript is an insightful, timely, and instructive review that will guide future muscle bioprinting research from a fundamental construct creation approach, down a translational pathway to achieve the desired impact in the clinic. Crown Copyright (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 66
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D Printing and Bioprinting in MEMS Technology
    Chua, Chee Kai
    Yeong, Wai Yee
    An, Jia
    [J]. MICROMACHINES, 2017, 8 (07)
  • [32] 3D Bioprinting for esophageal tissue regeneration: A review
    Kirthanashri S. Vasanthan
    Varadharajan Srinivasan
    Vidhi Mathur
    Prachi Agarwal
    Neha Negi
    Simran Kumari
    [J]. Journal of Materials Research, 2022, 37 : 88 - 113
  • [33] 3D bioprinting of multicellular scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration
    Qin, Chen
    Ma, Jingge
    Chen, Lei
    Ma, Hongshi
    Zhuang, Hui
    Zhang, Meng
    Huan, Zhiguang
    Chang, Jiang
    Ma, Nan
    Wu, Chengtie
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY, 2021, 49 : 68 - 84
  • [34] 3D Bioprinting Constructs to Facilitate Skin Regeneration
    Daikuara, Luciana Y.
    Chen, Xifang
    Yue, Zhilian
    Skropeta, Danielle
    Wood, Fiona M.
    Fear, Mark W.
    Wallace, Gordon G.
    [J]. ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2022, 32 (03)
  • [35] 3D Bioprinting for esophageal tissue regeneration: A review
    Vasanthan, Kirthanashri S.
    Srinivasan, Varadharajan
    Mathur, Vidhi
    Agarwal, Prachi
    Negi, Neha
    Kumari, Simran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2022, 37 (01) : 88 - 113
  • [36] 3D Graphene Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Future Perspectives
    Palmieri, Valentina
    Sciandra, Francesca
    Bozzi, Manuela
    De Spirito, Marco
    Papi, Massimiliano
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8
  • [37] Recent trends in peripheral nervous regeneration using 3D biomaterials
    Ashraf, Roqia
    Sofi, Hasham S.
    Beigh, Mushtaq A.
    Sheikh, Faheem A.
    [J]. TISSUE & CELL, 2019, 59 : 70 - 81
  • [38] Bioprinting of double network hydrogel for skeletal muscle regeneration
    Patel, Kapil Dev
    Shannon, Mark
    Day, Graham J.
    Perriman, Adam W.
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2023, 29 (13-14)
  • [39] 3-D Bioprinting of Skeletal Muscle Constructs for Reconstruction
    Kim, J.
    Seol, Y.
    Ko, I.
    Kang, H.
    Lee, S.
    Atala, A.
    Yoo, J. J.
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2014, 20 : S98 - S98
  • [40] Recent Trends in Injury Models to Study Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Repair
    Sicherer, Sydnee T.
    Venkatarama, Rashmi S.
    Grasman, Jonathan M.
    [J]. BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2020, 7 (03): : 1 - 11