Recent trends in 3D bioprinting technology for skeletal muscle regeneration

被引:1
|
作者
Sabetkish, Shabnam [1 ,3 ]
Currie, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Meagher, Laurence [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Australian Regenerat Med Inst, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, ARC Training Ctr Cell & Tissue Engn Technol, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Bioprinting; Muscle; Regeneration; Hydrogels; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; MYOGENIC CELLS; TISSUE; HYDROGELS; SCAFFOLD; DIFFERENTIATION; CONSTRUCTS; FABRICATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2024.04.038
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Skeletal muscle is a pro-regenerative tissue, that utilizes a tissue-resident stem cell system to effect repair upon injury. Despite the demonstrated efficiency of this system in restoring muscle mass after many acute injuries, in conditions of severe trauma such as those evident in volumetric muscle loss (VML) (> 20 % by mass), this self-repair capability is unable to restore tissue architecture, requiring interventions which currently are largely surgical. As a possible alternative, the generation of artificial muscle using tissue engineering approaches may also be of importance in the treatment of VML and muscle diseases such as dystrophies. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has been identified as a promising technique for regeneration of the complex architecture of skeletal muscle. This review discusses existing treatment strategies following muscle damage, recent progress in bioprinting techniques, the bioinks used for muscle regeneration, the immunogenicity of scaffold materials, and in vitro and in vivo maturation techniques for 3D bio-printed muscle constructs. The pros and cons of these bioink formulations are also highlighted. Finally, we present the current limitations and challenges in the field and critical factors to consider for bioprinting approaches to become more translationa and to produce clinically relevant engineered muscle. Statement of significance This review discusses the physiopathology of muscle injuries and existing clinical treatment strategies for muscle damage, the types of bioprinting techniques that have been applied to bioprinting of muscle, and the bioinks commonly used for muscle regeneration. The pros and cons of these bioinks are highlighted. We present a discussion of existing gaps in the literature and critical factors to consider for the translation of bioprinting approaches and to produce clinically relevant engineered muscle. Finally, we provide insights into what we believe will be the next steps required before the realization of the application of tissue-engineered muscle in humans. We believe this manuscript is an insightful, timely, and instructive review that will guide future muscle bioprinting research from a fundamental construct creation approach, down a translational pathway to achieve the desired impact in the clinic. Crown Copyright (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 66
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D Bioprinting: Recent Trends and Challenges
    Chameettachal, Shibu
    Yeleswarapu, Sriya
    Sasikumar, Shyama
    Shukla, Priyanshu
    Hibare, Purva
    Bera, Ashis Kumar
    Bojedla, Sai Ramya
    Pati, Falguni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (03) : 375 - 403
  • [2] 3D Bioprinting: Recent Trends and Challenges
    Shibu Chameettachal
    Sriya Yeleswarapu
    Shyama Sasikumar
    Priyanshu Shukla
    Purva Hibare
    Ashis Kumar Bera
    Sri Sai Ramya Bojedla
    Falguni Pati
    [J]. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2019, 99 : 375 - 403
  • [3] 3D Bioprinting in Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering
    Ostrovidov, Serge
    Salehi, Sahar
    Costantini, Marco
    Suthiwanich, Kasinan
    Ebrahimi, Majid
    Sadeghian, Ramin Banan
    Fujie, Toshinori
    Shi, Xuetao
    Cannata, Stefano
    Gargioli, Cesare
    Tamayol, Ali
    Dokmeci, Mehmet Remzi
    Orive, Gorka
    Swieszkowski, Wojciech
    Khademhosseini, Ali
    [J]. SMALL, 2019, 15 (24)
  • [4] Advances in 3D bioprinting technology for liver regeneration
    Li, Changcan
    Jiang, Zhuoran
    Yang, Huayu
    [J]. HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2022, 11 (06) : 917 - 919
  • [5] Progress in 3D Bioprinting Technology for Osteochondral Regeneration
    Lafuente-Merchan, Markel
    Ruiz-Alonso, Sandra
    Garcia-Villen, Fatima
    Gallego, Idoia
    Galvez-Martin, Patricia
    Saenz-del-Burgo, Laura
    Pedraz, Jose Luis
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICS, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [6] Advances in electrospinning and 3D bioprinting strategies to enhance functional regeneration of skeletal muscle tissue
    Thangadurai, Madhumithra
    Ajith, Athulya
    Budharaju, Harshavardhan
    Sethuraman, Swaminathan
    Sundaramurthi, Dhakshinamoorthy
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES, 2022, 142
  • [7] Recent advances in 3D bioprinting for the regeneration of functional cartilage
    Ji Xiongfa
    Zhu Hao
    Zhao Liming
    Xiao Jun
    [J]. REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (01) : 73 - 87
  • [8] 3D Bioprinting of Biomimetic Skeletal Muscle Tissue Constructs
    Kim, J.
    Seol, Y.
    Ko, I.
    Yoo, J.
    Atala, A.
    Lee, S.
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2017, 23 : S84 - S84
  • [9] Bioprinting of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models: A review
    Zhuang, Pei
    An, Jia
    Chua, Chee Kai
    Tan, Lay Poh
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2020, 193
  • [10] Optimized 3D Bioprinting Technology Based on Machine Learning: A Review of Recent Trends and Advances
    Shin, Jaemyung
    Lee, Yoonjung
    Li, Zhangkang
    Hu, Jinguang
    Park, Simon S.
    Kim, Keekyoung
    [J]. MICROMACHINES, 2022, 13 (03)