Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Models for the Risk of Emergency Caesarean Births

被引:0
|
作者
Hunt, Alexandra [1 ]
Bonnett, Laura [1 ]
Heron, Jon [2 ]
Lawton, Michael [3 ]
Clayton, Gemma [2 ]
Smith, Gordon [4 ,5 ]
Norman, Jane [6 ]
Kenny, Louise [7 ]
Lawlor, Deborah [2 ]
Merriel, Abi [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Liverpool, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Bristol, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cambridge, England
[5] Rosie Hosp, Cambridge, England
[6] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
[7] Univ Liverpool, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Liverpool, England
[8] Univ Liverpool, Ctr Womens Hlth Res, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Liverpool, England
[9] Liverpool Womens Hosp, Liverpool, England
关键词
emergency caesareans; maternal Health; prediction; prognostic; risk factors; SECTION; INDUCTION; DELIVERY; TOOL; APPLICABILITY; VALIDATION; PROBAST; EVENTS; WOMEN; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17948
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundGlobally, caesarean births (CB), including emergency caesareans births (EmCB), are rising. It is estimated that nearly a third of all births will be CB by 2030.ObjectivesIdentify and summarise the results from studies developing and validating prognostic multivariable models predicting the risk of EmCBs. Ultimately understanding the accuracy of their development, and whether they are operationalised for use in routine clinical practice.Search StrategyStudies were identified using databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Scopus with a search strategy tailored to models predicting EmCBs.Selection CriteriaProspective studies developing and validating clinical prediction models, with two or more covariates, to predict risk of EmCB.Data Collection and AnalysisData were extracted onto a proforma using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).ResultsIn total, 8083 studies resulted in 56 unique prediction modelling studies and seven validating studies, with a total of 121 different predictors. Frequently occurring predictors included maternal height, maternal age, parity, BMI and gestational age. PROBAST highlighted 33 studies with low overall bias, and these all internally validated their model. Thirteen studies externally validated; only eight of these were graded an overall low risk of bias. Six models offered applications that could be readily used, but only one provided enough time to offer a planned caesarean birth (pCB). These well-refined models have not been recalibrated since development. Only one model, developed in a relatively low-risk population, with data collected a decade ago, remains useful at 36 weeks for arranging a pCB.ConclusionTo improve personalised clinical conversations, there is a pressing need for a model that accurately predicts the timely risk of an EmCB for women across diverse clinical backgrounds. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023384439.ConclusionTo improve personalised clinical conversations, there is a pressing need for a model that accurately predicts the timely risk of an EmCB for women across diverse clinical backgrounds. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023384439.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Prediction Models of Natural Menopause Onset: A Systematic Review
    Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza
    Kummer, Stefanie
    Raguindin, Peter Francis
    Dejanovic, Gordana
    Taneri, Petek Eylul
    Cardona, Isabel
    Kastrati, Lum
    Minder, Beatrice
    Voortman, Trudy
    Marques-Vidal, Pedro
    Dhana, Klodian
    Glisic, Marija
    Muka, Taulant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2022, 107 (10): : 2934 - 2944
  • [22] Risk prediction models for contrast induced nephropathy: systematic review
    Silver, Samuel A.
    Shah, Prakesh M.
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    Harel, Shai
    Wald, Ron
    Harel, Ziv
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 351
  • [23] Risk Prediction Models for Inadvertent Intraoperative Hypothermia: A Systematic Review
    Yan, Lupei
    Yao, Lili
    Zhao, Qinghua
    Xiao, Mingzhao
    Li, Yuerong
    Min, Su
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2021, 36 (06) : 724 - 729
  • [24] A systematic review of risk prediction models for falls after stroke
    Walsh, M.
    Horgan, F.
    Galvin, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2015, 10 : 56 - 56
  • [25] Risk Prediction Models for Hospital Readmission In Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Mehta, Hemalkumar B.
    Sieloff, Eric
    Veeranki, Sreenivas P.
    Sura, Sneha D.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    Senagore, Anthony J.
    Goodwin, James S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 225 (04) : E113 - E113
  • [26] Systematic review of risk prediction models for falls after stroke
    Walsh, Mary E.
    Horgan, N. Frances
    Walsh, Cathal D.
    Galvin, Rose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2016, 70 (05) : 513 - 519
  • [27] Clinical Prediction Models for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review
    Jaja, Blessing N. R.
    Cusimano, Michael D.
    Etminan, Nima
    Hanggi, Daniel
    Hasan, David
    Ilodigwe, Don
    Lantigua, Hector
    Le Roux, Peter
    Lo, Benjamin
    Louffat-Olivares, Ada
    Mayer, Stephan
    Molyneux, Andrew
    Quinn, Audrey
    Schweizer, Tom A.
    Schenk, Thomas
    Spears, Julian
    Todd, Michael
    Torner, James
    Vergouwen, Mervyn D. I.
    Wong, George K. C.
    Singh, Jeff
    Macdonald, R. Loch
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2013, 18 (01) : 143 - 153
  • [28] A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation
    Ratna, M. B.
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Abdulrahim, B.
    McLernon, D. J.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (01) : 100 - 116
  • [29] Clinical Prediction Models for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review
    Blessing N. R. Jaja
    Michael D. Cusimano
    Nima Etminan
    Daniel Hanggi
    David Hasan
    Don Ilodigwe
    Hector Lantigua
    Peter Le Roux
    Benjamin Lo
    Ada Louffat-Olivares
    Stephan Mayer
    Andrew Molyneux
    Audrey Quinn
    Tom A. Schweizer
    Thomas Schenk
    Julian Spears
    Michael Todd
    James Torner
    Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen
    George K. C. Wong
    Jeff Singh
    R. Loch Macdonald
    [J]. Neurocritical Care, 2013, 18 : 143 - 153
  • [30] Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
    Damen, Johanna A. A. G.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Schuit, Ewoud
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    Collins, Gary S.
    Tzoulaki, Ioanna
    Lassale, Camille M.
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Chiocchia, Virginia
    Roberts, Corran
    Schlussel, Michael Maia
    Gerry, Stephen
    Black, James A.
    Heus, Pauline
    van der Schouw, Yvonne T.
    Peelen, Linda M.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353