Efficacy and safety of intrathecal diamorphine: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Grape, Sina [1 ,2 ]
El-Boghdadly, Kariem [3 ,4 ]
Jaques, Cecile [5 ,6 ]
Albrecht, Eric [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Valais Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Sion, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, London, England
[5] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Med Lib, Lausanne, Switzerland
[6] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] Univ Hosp Lausanne, Dept Anaesthesia, Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
analgesia; diamorphine; postoperative nausea and vomiting; spinal anaesthesia; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; CESAREAN-SECTION; SUBARACHNOID DIAMORPHINE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; DOSE-RESPONSE; ANALGESIA; HETEROGENEITY; FENTANYL;
D O I
10.1111/anae.16359
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundIntrathecal diamorphine is believed to provide postoperative analgesia but is associated with adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. There is little evidence of synthesis regarding intrathecal diamorphine in the contemporary literature. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis to determine the magnitude of intrathecal diamorphine efficacy and safety. MethodsWe systematically searched the literature for trials comparing intrathecal diamorphine with a control group in patients undergoing all types of surgery. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were intravenous morphine consumption and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24 h following surgery, respectively. ResultsTwelve trials were identified, which included data for 712 patients. Intrathecal doses of diamorphine ranged from 100 mu g to 2500 mu g. Intravenous morphine consumption at 24 h postoperatively was significantly reduced in the intrathecal diamorphine group, with a mean difference (95%CI) of -8 mg (-11 to -6), I2 = 93%, p < 0.001. There was a significant difference between three intrathecal diamorphine dosing subgroups but without correlation: mean differences (95%CI) -1 mg (-3-0), -26 mg (-40 to -11) and -6 mg (-15-4) in patients receiving doses of 0-200 mu g, 201-400 mu g and > 400 mu g, respectively (p = 0.003). Intrathecal diamorphine increased postoperative nausea and vomiting with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 1.37 (1.19-1.58), I2 = 7%, p < 0.001. There were no differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting between the three intrathecal diamorphine dosing subgroups. There was no correlation observed with meta-regression of the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was very low. ConclusionThere is very low level of evidence that intrathecal diamorphine provides effective analgesia after surgery, while increasing postoperative nausea and vomiting with doses > 200 mu g.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1090
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pain memory in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a meta-regression
    Cuenca-Martinez, Ferran
    Herranz-Gomez, Aida
    Varangot-Reille, Clovis
    Bajcar, Elzbieta A.
    Adamczyk, Waclaw M.
    Suso-Marti, Luis
    Babel, Przemyslaw
    PAIN, 2024, 165 (07) : 1450 - 1463
  • [22] Metformin and colorectal cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Ng, Cheng-Ann Winston
    Jiang, Amy Aimei
    Toh, Emma Min Shuen
    Ng, Cheng Han
    Ong, Zhi Hao
    Peng, Siyu
    Tham, Hui Yu
    Sundar, Raghav
    Chong, Choon Seng
    Khoo, Chin Meng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 35 (08) : 1501 - 1512
  • [23] A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression on the Effects of Carbohydrates on Sleep
    Vlahoyiannis, Angelos
    Giannaki, Christoforos D.
    Sakkas, Giorgos K.
    Aphamis, George
    Andreou, Eleni
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (04)
  • [24] Metformin and colorectal cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Cheng-Ann Winston Ng
    Amy Aimei Jiang
    Emma Min Shuen Toh
    Cheng Han Ng
    Zhi Hao Ong
    Siyu Peng
    Hui Yu Tham
    Raghav Sundar
    Choon Seng Chong
    Chin Meng Khoo
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2020, 35 : 1501 - 1512
  • [25] Convalescent plasma for COVID-19: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and meta-regression
    Snow, Timothy A. C.
    Saleem, Naveed
    Ambler, Gareth
    Nastouli, Eleni
    McCoy, Laura E.
    Singer, Mervyn
    Arulkumaran, Nishkantha
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 127 (06) : 834 - 844
  • [26] The safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin for management of scars: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Wang, Di
    Qu, Jiaorong
    Jiang, Haiyue
    Jiang, Yu
    TOXICON, 2019, 166 : 24 - 33
  • [27] Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
    Ijaz, Iqra
    Shahzad, Muhammad Naveed
    Hosseinifard, Hossein
    Liu, Shuya
    Sefidan, Masoud Ostadi
    Kahloon, Lubna Ejaz
    Imani, Saber
    Hua, Zhong
    Zhang, Yu Qin
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (13): : 13894 - 13911
  • [28] Surgical revascularizations for pediatric moyamoya: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
    Lee, Keng Siang
    Zhang, John J. Y.
    Bhate, Sanjay
    Ganesan, Vijeya
    Thompson, Dominic
    James, Greg
    Silva, Adikarige Haritha Dulanka
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2023, 39 (05) : 1225 - 1243
  • [29] Surgical revascularizations for pediatric moyamoya: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
    Keng Siang Lee
    John J. Y. Zhang
    Sanjay Bhate
    Vijeya Ganesan
    Dominic Thompson
    Greg James
    Adikarige Haritha Dulanka Silva
    Child's Nervous System, 2023, 39 : 1225 - 1243
  • [30] Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis
    Uppal, Vishal
    Retter, Susanne
    Casey, Margaret
    Sancheti, Sushil
    Matheson, Kara
    McKeen, Dolores M.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (01): : 111 - 125