Reporting and analysis of process-of-care time measures in clinical trials for hyperacute stroke interventions: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Italiano, Dominic [1 ,2 ]
Johns, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Campbell, Bruce [3 ]
Turc, Guillaume [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Churilov, Leonid [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Med Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Melbourne Brain Ctr, Australian Stroke Alliance, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Med & Neurol, Melbourne Brain Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] GHU Paris Psychiat & Neurosci, Dept Neurol, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris Cite, Paris, France
[6] Inserm, Paris, France
[7] FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France
关键词
clinical trials; hyperacute stroke; methodology; scoping reviews; time measures; TENECTEPLASE; THROMBECTOMY; ALTEPLASE;
D O I
10.11124/JBIES-23-00136
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:The objective of this scoping review is to investigate the reporting and comparison of process-of-care time measures in hyperacute stroke trials and systematic reviews of trials (subsequently referred to as "studies").Introduction:Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. A crucial factor in determining the effectiveness of stroke care in improving patient outcomes is time; therefore, time measures are frequently reported in studies of hyperacute stroke interventions. However, there is inconsistency in how these measures are reported and compared. Furthermore, there is a lack of clarity in how compatible the reporting methods are with the statistical analysis methods.Inclusion criteria:This scoping review will include studies that report and/or compare time measures between key events of interest in the delivery of hyperacute stroke care. Studies of thrombolytic therapy and/or thrombectomy, as well as controlled trials of mobile stroke unit interventions, will be included.Methods:The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search will be executed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and clinical trial registries ANZCTR, ISRCTN, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Title and abstract screening will be followed by full-text screening and subsequent data extraction from eligible studies. The results from this scoping review will be presented in tables and narratively summarized.Review registration:Open Science Framework https://osf.io/y98wz
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cognitive rehabilitation interventions after stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhao, Qing
    Wang, Xue
    Wang, Tao
    Dmytriw, Adam A.
    Zhang, Xiao
    Yang, Kun
    Luo, Jichang
    Bai, Xuesong
    Jiang, Nan
    Yang, Bin
    Ma, Yan
    Jiao, Liqun
    Xie, Yunyan
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [22] Reporting of “usual care” as the control group in randomized clinical trials of physiotherapy interventions for multiple sclerosis is poor: a systematic review
    Matteo Paci
    Federico Risaliti
    Leonardo Pellicciari
    Neurological Sciences, 2022, 43 : 5207 - 5216
  • [23] Reporting of "usual care" as the control group in randomized clinical trials of physiotherapy interventions for multiple sclerosis is poor: a systematic review
    Paci, Matteo
    Risaliti, Federico
    Pellicciari, Leonardo
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 43 (09) : 5207 - 5216
  • [24] Cross-sectional analysis of the reporting of continuous outcome measures and clinical significance of results in randomized trials of non-pharmacological interventions
    Hoffmann, Tammy C.
    Thomas, Sarah T.
    Shin, Paul Ng Hung
    Glasziou, Paul P.
    TRIALS, 2014, 15 : 1
  • [25] A scoping review of how behavioural theories, models and frameworks have been applied to the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of clinical trials
    Coffey, Taylor
    Young, Naomi
    Gillies, Katie
    TRIALS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [26] Cross-sectional analysis of the reporting of continuous outcome measures and clinical significance of results in randomized trials of non-pharmacological interventions
    Tammy C Hoffmann
    Sarah T Thomas
    Paul Ng Hung Shin
    Paul P Glasziou
    Trials, 15
  • [27] Exploring approaches to contemporary clinical incident analysis methods within acute care settings: a scoping review protocol
    Kynoch, Kathryn
    Liu, Xianliang
    Tan, Jing-Yu
    Shi, Wendan
    Teus, Judeil Krlan
    Ramis, Mary-Anne
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (03) : 505 - 512
  • [28] Investigating the reporting of participant characteristics relating to health equity in randomised controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke anxiety and/or depression: a scoping review
    Ottaway, Georgina
    Ene, Crina
    Gracey, Fergus
    Broomfield, Niall M.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [29] Self-care interventions in stroke survivor-caregiver dyads: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Wenna
    Lin, Beilei
    Mei, Yongxia
    Zhang, Zhenxiang
    Zhou, Bing
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [30] Religious and spiritual interventions in mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Goncalves, J. P. B.
    Lucchetti, G.
    Menezes, P. R.
    Vallada, H.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (14) : 2937 - 2949