Reporting and analysis of process-of-care time measures in clinical trials for hyperacute stroke interventions: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Italiano, Dominic [1 ,2 ]
Johns, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Campbell, Bruce [3 ]
Turc, Guillaume [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Churilov, Leonid [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Med Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Melbourne Brain Ctr, Australian Stroke Alliance, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Med & Neurol, Melbourne Brain Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] GHU Paris Psychiat & Neurosci, Dept Neurol, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris Cite, Paris, France
[6] Inserm, Paris, France
[7] FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France
关键词
clinical trials; hyperacute stroke; methodology; scoping reviews; time measures; TENECTEPLASE; THROMBECTOMY; ALTEPLASE;
D O I
10.11124/JBIES-23-00136
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:The objective of this scoping review is to investigate the reporting and comparison of process-of-care time measures in hyperacute stroke trials and systematic reviews of trials (subsequently referred to as "studies").Introduction:Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. A crucial factor in determining the effectiveness of stroke care in improving patient outcomes is time; therefore, time measures are frequently reported in studies of hyperacute stroke interventions. However, there is inconsistency in how these measures are reported and compared. Furthermore, there is a lack of clarity in how compatible the reporting methods are with the statistical analysis methods.Inclusion criteria:This scoping review will include studies that report and/or compare time measures between key events of interest in the delivery of hyperacute stroke care. Studies of thrombolytic therapy and/or thrombectomy, as well as controlled trials of mobile stroke unit interventions, will be included.Methods:The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search will be executed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and clinical trial registries ANZCTR, ISRCTN, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Title and abstract screening will be followed by full-text screening and subsequent data extraction from eligible studies. The results from this scoping review will be presented in tables and narratively summarized.Review registration:Open Science Framework https://osf.io/y98wz
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reporting and analysis of process-of-care time measures for hyperacute stroke interventions
    Italiano, Dominic
    Johns, Hannah
    Campbell, Bruce
    Turc, Guillaume
    Churilov, Leonid
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 53 : 90 - 90
  • [2] Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol
    Butcher, Nancy J.
    Mew, Emma J.
    Saeed, Leena
    Monsour, Andrea
    Chee-a-Tow, Alyssandra
    Chan, An-Wen
    Moher, David
    Offringa, Martin
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [3] Reporting time toxicity in prospective cancer clinical trials: A scoping review
    Quinn, Patrick L.
    Saiyed, Shah
    Hannon, Connor
    Sarna, Angela
    Waterman, Brittany L.
    Cloyd, Jordan M.
    Spriggs, Rodney
    Rush, Laura J.
    McAlearney, Ann Scheck
    Ejaz, Aslam
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [4] Adverse Events Reporting of Clinical Trials in Exercise Oncology Research (ADVANCE): Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Luo, Hao
    Schumacher, Oliver
    Galvao, Daniel A.
    Newton, Robert U.
    Taaffe, Dennis R.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [5] Outcome measures of palliative care programs and interventions implemented in nursing homes: a scoping review protocol
    Meng, Lingyuan
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Sharplin, Greg
    Eckert, Marion
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (02) : 715 - 722
  • [6] Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Quasdorf, Tina
    Clack, Lauren
    Laporte Uribe, Franziska
    Holle, Daniela
    Berwig, Martin
    Purwins, Daniel
    Schultes, Marie-Therese
    Roes, Martina
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [7] Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Tina Quasdorf
    Lauren Clack
    Franziska Laporte Uribe
    Daniela Holle
    Martin Berwig
    Daniel Purwins
    Marie-Therese Schultes
    Martina Roes
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [8] Reporting of interventions and "standard of care" control arms in pediatric clinical trials: a quantitative analysis
    Yu, Ashley M.
    Balasubramanaiam, Bannuya
    Offringa, Martin
    Kelly, Lauren E.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2018, 84 (03) : 393 - 398
  • [9] Reporting of Interventions and Standard of Care Control Arms in Paediatric Clinical Trials; A Quantitative Analysis
    Kelly, Lauren E.
    Yu, Ashley M.
    Balasubramanaiam, Bannuya
    Offringa, Martin
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 433 - 433
  • [10] Reporting of interventions and “standard of care” control arms in pediatric clinical trials: a quantitative analysis
    Ashley M. Yu
    Bannuya Balasubramanaiam
    Martin Offringa
    Lauren E. Kelly
    Pediatric Research, 2018, 84 : 393 - 398