Promoting emergent literacy skills among children at risk for specific learning disorder: general vs. Specific vs. Combined metacognitive interventions

被引:1
|
作者
Apelboim-Dushnitzky, Gila [1 ,2 ]
Shamir, Adina [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Special Educ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Talpiot Coll, Dept Presch Educ, Holon, Israel
关键词
Specific learning disorder; vocabulary; story comprehension; metacognition; e-book; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; READING-COMPREHENSION; ELECTRONIC BOOKS; SELF-REGULATION; STUDENTS; VOCABULARY; KINDERGARTEN; READERS; DIFFICULTIES; PRESCHOOLERS;
D O I
10.1080/08856257.2024.2354604
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
First graders with Developmental Language Disorder are considered at risk for exhibiting Specific Learning Disorder during school years. They also have deficiencies in their metacognitive skills, which leads to less effective learning processes. The current study examined, for the first time, the added value of various types of metacognitive interventions prior to an activity with an e-book for promoting language and literacy skills. Three experimental groups, each comprised of 30 first graders at risk for Specific Learning Disorder, were provided metacognitive intervention (specific, general, or combined) prior to an individual learning process with an e-book. The metacognitive interventions were designed according to the Triple A Model. Two control groups were also assigned: one control group engaged with an e-book without receiving any prior metacognitive intervention, and another followed its regular school activities. All groups were measured pre- and post-individual learning processes for language (vocabulary) and literacy (story comprehension) achievements. Results demonstrated an advantage to prior specific metacognitive intervention for promoting vocabulary as well as story comprehension measures. Although children at risk for Specific Learning Disorder tend to exhibit difficulties with generalisation processes, the combined metacognitive intervention proved to be as effective as the specific one.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 275
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] General purpose finite element analysis code vs. specific design and analysis requirements
    Steven, G.
    Innovation in Engineering Computational Technology, 2006, : 63 - 85
  • [22] What Is the Impact of Specific Vs. Combined Purpose Model Library in Knowledge Based Planning?
    Bossart, E.
    Duffy, M.
    Simpson, G.
    Abramowitz, M.
    Pollack, A.
    Dogan, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2902 - 2902
  • [23] Nepotism vs. Specific Skills: The effect of professional liberalization on returns to parental background of Italian lawyers
    Raitano, Michele
    Vona, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 184 : 489 - 505
  • [24] Effects of Periodized vs. Nonperiodized Resistance Training on Army-Specific Fitness and Skills Performance
    Heilbronn, Brian E.
    Doma, Kenji
    Gormann, Dale
    Schumann, Moritz
    Sinclair, Wade H.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (03) : 738 - 753
  • [25] SPECIFIC VENTILATION IMAGING: GATED VS. FREE-BREATHING IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS CHILDREN
    Bayfield, K.
    Sa, R.
    Walker, T.
    Prisk, G.
    Robinson, P.
    Jayasuriya, G.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2021, 26 : 56 - 56
  • [26] Dimension-wide vs. exemplar-specific attention in category learning and recognition
    Sakamoto, Y
    Matsuka, T
    Love, BC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE MODELING, 2004, : 261 - 266
  • [27] Specific immunotherapy in grass-pollen allergic asthma combined with inhaled steroid therapy vs. specific immunotherapy alone
    Boskovska, M
    ALLERGY, 2002, 57 : 344 - 344
  • [28] Proficiency in Gross Motor Skills Among Home- vs. Public-Schooled Children
    Ullmann, Lauren
    Oh, Yoonsin
    Braun, Saori
    Johnson, Marquell J.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2021, 92 : A48 - A49
  • [29] Brief report: Bifactor modeling of general vs. specific factors of religiousness differentially predicting substance use risk in adolescence
    Kim-Spoon, Jungmeen
    Longo, Gregory S.
    Holmes, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2015, 43 : 15 - 19
  • [30] Tablet vs. Book learning: association with memory, attention, and learning abilities among lebanese children
    Tawil, Jessika
    Haddad, Chadia
    Farchakh, Youssef
    Sacre, Hala
    Nabout, Rita
    Obeid, Sahar
    Salameh, Pascale
    Hallit, Souheil
    VULNERABLE CHILDREN AND YOUTH STUDIES, 2023, 18 (03) : 393 - 405