Promoting emergent literacy skills among children at risk for specific learning disorder: general vs. Specific vs. Combined metacognitive interventions

被引:1
|
作者
Apelboim-Dushnitzky, Gila [1 ,2 ]
Shamir, Adina [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Special Educ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Talpiot Coll, Dept Presch Educ, Holon, Israel
关键词
Specific learning disorder; vocabulary; story comprehension; metacognition; e-book; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; READING-COMPREHENSION; ELECTRONIC BOOKS; SELF-REGULATION; STUDENTS; VOCABULARY; KINDERGARTEN; READERS; DIFFICULTIES; PRESCHOOLERS;
D O I
10.1080/08856257.2024.2354604
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
First graders with Developmental Language Disorder are considered at risk for exhibiting Specific Learning Disorder during school years. They also have deficiencies in their metacognitive skills, which leads to less effective learning processes. The current study examined, for the first time, the added value of various types of metacognitive interventions prior to an activity with an e-book for promoting language and literacy skills. Three experimental groups, each comprised of 30 first graders at risk for Specific Learning Disorder, were provided metacognitive intervention (specific, general, or combined) prior to an individual learning process with an e-book. The metacognitive interventions were designed according to the Triple A Model. Two control groups were also assigned: one control group engaged with an e-book without receiving any prior metacognitive intervention, and another followed its regular school activities. All groups were measured pre- and post-individual learning processes for language (vocabulary) and literacy (story comprehension) achievements. Results demonstrated an advantage to prior specific metacognitive intervention for promoting vocabulary as well as story comprehension measures. Although children at risk for Specific Learning Disorder tend to exhibit difficulties with generalisation processes, the combined metacognitive intervention proved to be as effective as the specific one.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 275
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technical students' metacognitive skills: relating general vs. specific metacognitive skills to study success
    Veenman, MVJ
    Verheij, J
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 13 (03) : 259 - 272
  • [2] Lumpers vs. splitters: Intelligence in children with specific learning disorders
    Giofre, David
    Pastore, Massimiliano
    Cornoldi, Cesare
    Toffalini, Enrico
    INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 76
  • [3] VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES: GENERAL ENGLISH VS. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
    Krcelic, P.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 1693 - 1698
  • [4] DISEASE-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE VS. FUNCTIONAL HEALTH LITERACY AMONG CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN WITH SICKLE CELL: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?
    Sisler, India
    Carden, Marcus A.
    Newlin, Jennifer
    Smith, Wally R.
    Godder, Kamar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 88 (12) : E28 - E28
  • [5] Patterns of International Organization: Task Specific vs. General Purpose
    Lenz, Tobias
    Bezuijen, Jeanine
    Hooghe, Liesbet
    Marks, Gary
    POLITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT, 2014, : 131 - +
  • [6] Promoting elementary school students' programming learning: Effects of metacognitive vs. cognitive scaffolding
    Huang, Yi-Pin
    Kim, Hoisoo
    Pan, Yingying
    Zheng, Xiao-Li
    Tu, Yun-Fang
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [7] Results from clinical studies with ImmunoCAP?®RAPID VS. Specific IgE Vs. Skin Prick Tests on Children
    Simoes, M. Helena
    NEW HORIZONS IN ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, : 133 - 133
  • [8] Association of Sexual Attitudes with Sexual Function: General vs. Specific Attitudes
    Carlos Sierra, Juan
    Gomez-Carranza, Jennifer
    Alvarez-Muelas, Ana
    Cervilla, Oscar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (19)
  • [9] Predicting metal toxicity revisited: general properties vs. specific effects
    Wolterbeek, HT
    Verburg, TG
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 279 (1-3) : 87 - 115
  • [10] Abdominal Obesity vs. Total Body Obesity: Specific Risk Factors
    Rubenstein, Joel H.
    Morgenstern, Hal
    Kellenberg, Joan E.
    Kalish, Tal
    Schoenfeld, Philip S.
    Inadomi, John M.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 138 (05) : S387 - S387