FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF OUTER PRESSURE CONTAINMENT VESSEL AND PROTON BEAM PIPE FOR PROTON RADIOGRAPHY UNDER OPERATIONAL LOADS

被引:0
|
作者
Holguin, Ryan [1 ]
Hill, Dallas [1 ]
Reichert, Heidi [1 ]
Deines, Kyle [1 ]
Bustos, Gerald [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section VIII Division 2 analyses on a containment pressure vessel system designed to host small-scale shock physics experiments containing hazardous materials. These shock physics experiments are imaged using proton radiography at Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE). The pressure vessel system examined is separated into two subsystems, the Outer Pressure Containment Vessel (OPCV) and the Beam Pipe and Auxiliary Hardware (BPAH). The OPCV mates with the BPAH to transport the proton beam and form the outer containment pressure boundary. An Inner Pressure Confinement Vessel (IPCV) is mounted inside the containment pressure boundary. The IPCV can be used to host a variety of physics experiments, which can include high explosive and hazardous materials. The IPCV is an impulsively loaded pressure vessel, while the OPCV and beam pipes are statically loaded. The OPCV and BPAH are designed to satisfy ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 Alternative Rules, Part 5 Design by Analysis Requirements for all load conditions expected during service. The BPAH is a series of stainless-steel tubes with low-profile flange assemblies, bellows, and aluminum windows to allow for proton imaging. The low-profile flanges are required for clearance of magnet bores located periodically along the length of the BPAH. The bellows are included along the beamline for ease of installation. The OPCV is a pressure vessel designed to interface with the BPAH, IPCV, and proton imaging alignment system. The OPCV and BPAH are both designed to support full vacuum loads. Major considerations for the BPAH are thermal elongation, collapse of bellows, and stresses due to clamp supports. Lifting loads and static equivalent loads transmitted from the IPCV are additional considerations for the OPCV. Under ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 Part 5.2.4, Elastic-Plastic Stress Analysis Method, Paragraph 5.2.4.3(a), Global Criteria, the requirements for analysis and acceptance are defined for the load cases described. A finite element analysis (FEA) model, performed in ANSYS 2020 R1, evaluates the design of the OPCV and BPAH under the aforementioned ASME guidance and criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Finite element stress analysis and evaluation of the sealing performance in pipe fittings with adhesive for threaded connections under internal pressure and bending moment
    Ishimura, Mitsutoshi
    Katsuo, Masahide
    Sawa, Toshiyuki
    Serizawa, Masamichi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION 2005, PTS A AND B, 2005, : 795 - 801
  • [32] Estimation of Stress Corrosion Cracking Growth Behavior Under Weld Residual Stress in the Bottom of a Reactor Pressure Vessel by Finite Element Analysis
    Iwamatsu, Fuminori
    Miyazaki, Katsumasa
    Mochizuki, Masahito
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (04):
  • [33] Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of a Steel-concrete Composite Beam under Cyclic Loads Considering Interface Slip Effects
    Kwak, H. G.
    Hwang, J. W.
    ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2011, 19 (03) : 249 - 254
  • [34] Impact of secondary particles on the magnetic field generated by a proton pencil beam: a finite-element analysis based on Geant4-DNA simulations
    Raedler, Martin
    Buizza, Giulia
    Kawula, Maria
    Palaniappan, Prasannakumar
    Gianoli, Chiara
    Baroni, Guido
    Paganelli, Chiara
    Parodi, Katia
    Riboldi, Marco
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (02) : 1000 - 1018
  • [35] Evaluation of structural integrity of Type-III hydrogen pressure vessel under low-velocity car-to-car collision using finite element analysis
    Han, Min-Gu
    Chang, Seung-Hwan
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2016, 148 : 198 - 206