Boosting carbon utilization efficiency for sustainable methanol production from biomass: Techno-economic and environmental analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Leiyu [1 ]
Gao, Ruxing [2 ]
Tang, Zongyue [1 ]
Zhang, Chundong [1 ]
Jun, Ki-Won [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Seok Ki [5 ]
Zhao, Tiansheng [6 ]
Wan, Hui [1 ]
Guan, Guofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Chem Engn, State Key Lab Mat Oriented Chem Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Sch Energy Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[3] Korea Res Inst Chem Technol KRICT, Carbon Resources Inst, Gas Separat & Convers Res Grp C1, Daejeon 34114, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ Sci & Technol UST, Adv Mat & Chem Engn, Daejeon 34113, South Korea
[5] Ajou Univ, Dept Energy Syst Res, Suwon 16499, South Korea
[6] Ningxia Univ, State Key Lab High Efficiency Utilizat Coal & Gree, Yinchuan 750021, Peoples R China
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Biomass -to -methanol process; Water electrolysis; Methane pyrolysis; Chemical looping; Techno-economic analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118504
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Concerns about depleted fossil fuels and the climate crisis have intensified the interest in producing biomassderived methanol. However, the traditional biomass-to-methanol (BTM) process suffers from low carbon conversion ability and serious CO2 emissions caused by the water-gas-shift (WGS) unit. In this study, three novel BTM processes coupled with solid oxide electrolysis, methane pyrolysis, and methane chemical looping technologies are proposed to eliminate WGS unit, and the systematic heat integration is considered to achieve energy cascade utilization. Meanwhile, process performances are comprehensively evaluated to compare the technical, economic, and environmental attractiveness of three novel BTM processes. It is found that compared with the original BTM process, three novel processes significantly improve carbon efficiency by 22%. Meanwhile, CO2 emissions are reduced by 60%. Moreover, the application of methane chemical looping technology is more economical, and the associated net production cost decreases by more than 30%. Additionally, the BTM process coupled with solid oxide electrolysis is more environmentally friendly, whereas the process with methane pyrolysis technology is more exergy-efficient. Overall, the integrated processes have significant application prospects for carbon conversion and mitigation ability as well as economic attractiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Macroalgae as a sustainable biostimulant for crop production according to techno-economic and environmental criteria
    Arias, Ana
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    Moreira, Maria Teresa
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 48 : 169 - 180
  • [32] Process simulation and techno-economic analysis for production of industrial sugars from lignocellulosic biomass
    Kuo, Po-Chih
    Yu, Jian
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2020, 155
  • [33] Techno-economic analysis and strategic optimization of biobutanol production from lignocellulosic biomass in Mexico
    Dudek, Karol
    Mokarrari, Kimiya Rahmani
    Aghamohamadi-Bosjin, Soroush
    Valdez-Vazquez, Idania
    Sowlati, Taraneh
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024,
  • [34] A Techno-economic Analysis of Polyhydroxyalkanoate and Hydrogen Production from Syngas Fermentation of Gasified Biomass
    DongWon Choi
    David C. Chipman
    Scott C. Bents
    Robert C. Brown
    [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2010, 160 : 1032 - 1046
  • [35] Techno-economic analysis of ammonia production via integrated biomass gasification
    Andersson, Jim
    Lundgren, Joakim
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 130 : 484 - 490
  • [36] Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-liquids production based on gasification
    Swanson, Ryan M.
    Platon, Alexandru
    Satrio, Justinus A.
    Brown, Robert C.
    [J]. FUEL, 2010, 89 : S2 - S10
  • [37] Dual biogas and biochar production from rice straw biomass: a techno-economic and sustainable development approach
    Ezz, Hani
    Ibrahim, Mona G.
    Fujii, Manabu
    Nasr, Mahmoud
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (12) : 10807 - 10821
  • [38] Dual biogas and biochar production from rice straw biomass: a techno-economic and sustainable development approach
    Hani Ezz
    Mona G. Ibrahim
    Manabu Fujii
    Mahmoud Nasr
    [J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 13 : 10807 - 10821
  • [39] A techno-economic analysis (TEA) of a combined process of torrefaction and gasification of lignocellulose biomass (bagasse) for methanol and electricity production
    Fajimi, L., I
    Chrisostomou, J.
    Oboirien, B. O.
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024, 14 (11) : 12501 - 12516
  • [40] Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China
    Chang, Yuan
    Gao, Siqi
    Ma, Qian
    Wei, Ying
    Li, Guoping
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 199