Prediction of naloxone dose in opioids toxicity based on machine learning techniques (artificial intelligence)

被引:0
|
作者
Mohtarami, Seyed Ali [1 ]
Mostafazadeh, Babak [2 ,3 ]
Shadnia, Shahin [2 ,3 ]
Rahimi, Mitra [2 ,3 ]
Evini, Peyman Erfan Talab [2 ,3 ]
Ramezani, Maral [4 ,5 ]
Borhany, Hamed [3 ]
Fathy, Mobin [3 ]
Eskandari, Hamidreza [3 ]
机构
[1] Legal Med Org, Legal Med Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Clin Res Dev Unit CRDU, Loghman Hakim Hosp, Tehran, Iran
[3] Loghman Hakim Univ, Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci SBMU, Toxicol Res Ctr,Dept Clin Toxicol, Excellence Ctr Clin Toxicol,Hosp Poison Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] Arak Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Arak, Iran
[5] Arak Univ Med Sci, Tradit & Complementary Med Res Ctr, Arak, Iran
关键词
Nnaloxone; Opioid overdose; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Drug poisoning; OVERDOSE; INFUSION; INTRANASAL; DISCHARGE; DURATION; REVERSAL; REFUSAL; DEATHS;
D O I
10.1007/s40199-024-00518-x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundTreatment management for opioid poisoning is critical and, at the same time, requires specialized knowledge and skills. This study was designed to develop and evaluate machine learning algorithms for predicting the maintenance dose and duration of hospital stay in opioid poisoning, in order to facilitate appropriate clinical decision-making.Method and resultsThis study used artificial intelligence technology to predict the maintenance dose and duration of administration by selecting clinical and paraclinical features that were selected by Pearson correlation (filter method) (Stage 1) and then the (wrapper method) Recursive Feature Elimination Cross-Validated (RFECV) (Stage2). The duration of administration was divided into two categories: A (which includes a duration of less than or equal to 24 h of infusion) and B (more than 24 h of naloxone infusion). XGBoost algorithm model with an accuracy rate of 91.04%, a prediction rate of 91.34%, and a sensitivity rate of 91.04% and area under the Curve (AUC) 0.97 was best model for classification patients. Also, the best maintenance dose of naloxone was obtained with XGBoost algorithm with R2 = 0.678. Based on the selected algorithm, the most important features for classifying patients for the duration of treatment were bicarbonate, respiration rate, physical sign, The partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, naloxone bolus dose, Blood Creatinine(Cr), Body temperature (T). The most important characteristics for determining the maintenance dose of naloxone were physical signs, bolus dose of 4.5 mg/kg, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) and intensive care unit (ICU) add.ConclusionA predictive model can significantly enhance the decision-making and clinical care provided by emergency physicians in hospitals and medical settings. XGBoost was found to be the superior model.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Anesthesiology
    Connor, Christopher W.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 131 (06) : 1346 - 1359
  • [42] Trustworthy machine learning and artificial intelligence
    Varshney, Kush R.
    [J]. XRDS: Crossroads, 2019, 25 (03): : 26 - 29
  • [43] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics
    Yamashiro, Takashi
    Ko, Ching-Chang
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 24 : 3 - 5
  • [44] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in rheumatology
    Dubey, Shirish
    Chan, Antoni
    Adebajo, Adewale O.
    Walker, David
    Bukhari, Marwan
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 63 (08)
  • [45] Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence
    Zoubin Ghahramani
    [J]. Nature, 2015, 521 : 452 - 459
  • [46] Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Raunak, M. S.
    Kuhn, Rick
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2021, 54 (10) : 25 - 27
  • [47] Artificial intelligence applications and machine learning
    Agrawal, Prateek
    [J]. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2020, 13 (06): : 1113 - 1114
  • [48] Bias in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Dube, Raghavi
    Shafana, Jeenath N.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 14 (09): : 227 - 234
  • [49] Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
    Sana, Munib
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (08) : 1139 - 1142
  • [50] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in nephropathology
    Becker, Jan U.
    Mayerich, David
    Padmanabhan, Meghana
    Barratt, Jonathan
    Ernst, Angela
    Boor, Peter
    Cicalese, Pietro A.
    Mohan, Chandra
    Nguyen, Hien V.
    Roysam, Badrinath
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 98 (01) : 65 - 75