Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Satellite Spin Property Estimation from Light Curves

被引:0
|
作者
Badura, Gregory P. [1 ]
Valenta, Christopher R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Tech Res Inst GTRI, Electroopt Syst Lab EOSL, 925 Dalney St NW, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES | 2024年 / 71卷 / 05期
关键词
Space domain awareness (SDA); Physics-guided machine learning; Physics-informed machine learning (PINN); Machine learning (ML); Space debris; NEURAL-NETWORK; ROTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40295-024-00464-5
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Knowledge of the spin state of space objects is critical for effectively planning operations such as collision avoidance and debris removal. One such passive method for assessing the spin rate and spin-axis of debris is through the use of passive brightness measurements known as "light curves." Astronomers have derived physics-based algorithms for retrieving spin state via light curve analysis. These algorithms convert the relative spin state into an inertial spin state by accounting for the motions of the observation telescope, the space object, and the sun. A major downside of these theories, however, is that the resulting cost functions for operational deployment are highly non-linear. The intractable nature of the spin state estimation problem opens the door for solution via Machine Learning (ML) models. Typical "black box" ML algorithms do not rely on scientific theory, but rather are trained on large data-bases to learn how to solve a task in a manner that is obscured from the operator. While ML models can be effective for making predictions that out-perform human-derived algorithms, they also have the potential to derive solutions that either violate known physical constraints or are non-generalizable to new data instances. This is in particular a concern for many Space Domain Awareness (SDA) problems that are rooted in the physical theory of the motions of orbiting bodies. To overcome the limitations of both physical theory and "black box" ML models for spin state retrieval, we leverage a hybrid approach: the physics-guided ML model. This concept uses a physics-based loss function in the learning objective of the ML model in order to guide the model towards making predictions that not only exhibit low prediction error with respect to training data but are also physically consistent with astronomer-derived theories. Towards this end, we introduce a new physically derived equation for relating the inertial spin state to observations of relative spin rates. We then show that this equation can be used as a loss function for training ML models. We present a time-variant ML model for the retrieval of spin state that substantially outperforms both randomized numerical optimization approaches as well as temporally-invariant ML methods such as Convolutional Neural Networks. Finally, we provide initial evidence that training of the time-variant ML model with our physics-based loss function is more stable and generalizes more effectively to unseen (i.e. "out-of-distribution") data instances. We believe that this paper provides promising avenues for merging big-data ML approaches with the robust physical theory of the SDA field.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physics-guided machine learning approaches to predict the ideal stability properties of fusion plasmas
    Piccione, A.
    Berkery, J. W.
    Sabbagh, S. A.
    Andreopoulos, Y.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2020, 60 (04)
  • [32] Inverse design of 3D cellular materials with physics-guided machine learning
    Abu-Mualla, Mohammad
    Huang, Jida
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2023, 232
  • [33] Physics-guided characterization and optimization of solar cells using surrogate machine learning model
    Ren, Zekun
    Oviedo, Felipe
    Xue, Hansong
    Thway, Muang
    Zhang, Kaicheng
    Li, Ning
    Perea, Jose Dario
    Layurova, Mariya
    Wang, Yue
    Tian, Siyu
    Heumueller, Thomas
    Birgersson, Erik
    Lin, Fen
    Aberle, Armin
    Sun, Shijing
    Peters, Ian Marius
    Stangl, Rolf
    Brabec, Christoph J.
    Buonassisi, Tonio
    2019 IEEE 46TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2019, : 3054 - 3058
  • [34] Probabilistic physics-guided transfer learning for material property prediction in extrusion deposition additive manufacturing
    Thomas, Akshay J.
    Jaszczuk, Mateusz
    Barocio, Eduardo
    Ghosh, Gourab
    Bilionis, Ilias
    Pipes, R. Byron
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 419
  • [35] Physics-guided federated learning as an enabler for digital twins
    Stadtmann, Florian
    Furevik, Erik Rugaard
    Rasheed, Adil
    Kvamsdal, Trond
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 258
  • [36] Physics-Guided Active Learning of Environmental Flow Fields
    Khodayi-mehr, Reza
    Jian, Pingcheng
    Zavlanos, Michael M.
    LEARNING FOR DYNAMICS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOL 211, 2023, 211
  • [37] Physics-guided neural network for tissue optical properties estimation
    Chong, Kian Chee
    Pramanik, Manojit
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2023, 14 (06) : 2576 - 2590
  • [38] Physics-Guided Deep Learning for Prediction of Energy Production from Geothermal Reservoirs
    Qin, Zhen
    Jiang, Anyue
    Faulder, Dave
    Cladouhos, Trenton T.
    Jafarpour, Behnam
    GEOTHERMICS, 2024, 116
  • [39] Physics-Guided Dual Self-Supervised Learning for Structure-Based Material Property Prediction
    Fu, Nihang
    Wei, Lai
    Hu, Jianjun
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2024, 15 (10): : 2841 - 2850
  • [40] Physics-guided deep learning for generating turbulent inflow conditions
    Yousif, Mustafa Z.
    Yu, Linqi
    Lim, HeeChang
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2022, 936