Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Satellite Spin Property Estimation from Light Curves

被引:0
|
作者
Badura, Gregory P. [1 ]
Valenta, Christopher R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Tech Res Inst GTRI, Electroopt Syst Lab EOSL, 925 Dalney St NW, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES | 2024年 / 71卷 / 05期
关键词
Space domain awareness (SDA); Physics-guided machine learning; Physics-informed machine learning (PINN); Machine learning (ML); Space debris; NEURAL-NETWORK; ROTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40295-024-00464-5
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Knowledge of the spin state of space objects is critical for effectively planning operations such as collision avoidance and debris removal. One such passive method for assessing the spin rate and spin-axis of debris is through the use of passive brightness measurements known as "light curves." Astronomers have derived physics-based algorithms for retrieving spin state via light curve analysis. These algorithms convert the relative spin state into an inertial spin state by accounting for the motions of the observation telescope, the space object, and the sun. A major downside of these theories, however, is that the resulting cost functions for operational deployment are highly non-linear. The intractable nature of the spin state estimation problem opens the door for solution via Machine Learning (ML) models. Typical "black box" ML algorithms do not rely on scientific theory, but rather are trained on large data-bases to learn how to solve a task in a manner that is obscured from the operator. While ML models can be effective for making predictions that out-perform human-derived algorithms, they also have the potential to derive solutions that either violate known physical constraints or are non-generalizable to new data instances. This is in particular a concern for many Space Domain Awareness (SDA) problems that are rooted in the physical theory of the motions of orbiting bodies. To overcome the limitations of both physical theory and "black box" ML models for spin state retrieval, we leverage a hybrid approach: the physics-guided ML model. This concept uses a physics-based loss function in the learning objective of the ML model in order to guide the model towards making predictions that not only exhibit low prediction error with respect to training data but are also physically consistent with astronomer-derived theories. Towards this end, we introduce a new physically derived equation for relating the inertial spin state to observations of relative spin rates. We then show that this equation can be used as a loss function for training ML models. We present a time-variant ML model for the retrieval of spin state that substantially outperforms both randomized numerical optimization approaches as well as temporally-invariant ML methods such as Convolutional Neural Networks. Finally, we provide initial evidence that training of the time-variant ML model with our physics-based loss function is more stable and generalizes more effectively to unseen (i.e. "out-of-distribution") data instances. We believe that this paper provides promising avenues for merging big-data ML approaches with the robust physical theory of the SDA field.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Satellite Spin Property Estimation from Light Curves
    Badura, Gregory P.
    Valenta, Christopher R.
    [J]. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 1600, 71 (05):
  • [2] Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Prediction of Cloud Properties in Satellite-Derived Solar Data
    Buster, Grant
    Bannister, Mike
    Habte, Aron
    Hettinger, Dylan
    Maclaurin, Galen
    Rossol, Michael
    Sengupta, Manajit
    Xie, Yu
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 48TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2021, : 335 - 338
  • [3] Physics-guided machine learning from simulated data with different physical parameters
    Chen, Shengyu
    Kalanat, Nasrin
    Xie, Yiqun
    Li, Sheng
    Zwart, Jacob A.
    Sadler, Jeffrey M.
    Appling, Alison P.
    Oliver, Samantha K.
    Read, Jordan S.
    Jia, Xiaowei
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 65 (08) : 3223 - 3250
  • [4] Physics-guided machine learning from simulated data with different physical parameters
    Shengyu Chen
    Nasrin Kalanat
    Yiqun Xie
    Sheng Li
    Jacob A. Zwart
    Jeffrey M. Sadler
    Alison P. Appling
    Samantha K. Oliver
    Jordan S. Read
    Xiaowei Jia
    [J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2023, 65 : 3223 - 3250
  • [5] Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Structural Metamodeling and Fragility Analysis
    Bond, Robert Bailey
    Ren, Pu
    Sun, Hao
    Hajjar, Jerome F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2024 - VOL 1, 2024, 519 : 855 - 866
  • [6] Probabilistic physics-guided machine learning for fatigue data analysis
    Chen, Jie
    Liu, Yongming
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 168
  • [7] Physics-Guided Adversarial Machine Learning for Aircraft Systems Simulation
    Ben Braiek, Houssem
    Reid, Thomas
    Khomh, Foutse
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2023, 72 (03) : 1161 - 1175
  • [8] Physics-guided Deep Learning for Power System State Estimation
    Lei Wang
    Qun Zhou
    Shuangshuang Jin
    [J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2020, 8 (04) : 607 - 615
  • [9] Learning Physics-guided Face Relighting under Directional Light
    Nestmeyer, Thomas
    Lalonde, Jean-Francois
    Matthews, Iain
    Lehrmann, Andreas
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2020, : 5123 - 5132
  • [10] Physics-guided Deep Learning for Power System State Estimation
    Wang, Lei
    Zhou, Qun
    Jin, Shuangshuang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2020, 8 (04) : 607 - 615