共 50 条
Effects of therapeutic ultrasound in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:0
|作者:
Luo, Yan
[1
]
Rahmati, Masoud
[2
,3
,4
]
Kazemi, Abdolreza
[4
]
Liu, Wenbing
[5
]
Lee, Seung Won
[6
]
Gyasi, Razak M.
[7
,8
]
Sanchez, Guillermo F. Lopez
[9
]
Koyanagi, Ai
[10
,11
]
Smith, Lee
[11
]
Yon, Dong Keon
[12
,13
]
机构:
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Clin Med Year Program 8, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, CEReSS Hlth Serv Res & Qual Life Ctr, Marseille, France
[3] Lorestan Univ, Fac Literature & Human Sci, Dept Phys Educ & Sport Sci, Khorramabad, Iran
[4] Vali E Asr Univ Rafsanjan, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Rafsanjan, Iran
[5] Wenzhou Med Univ, Eye Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Ocular Dis, Wenzhou 325027, Peoples R China
[6] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Precis Med, Coll Med, Suwon, South Korea
[7] African Populat & Hlth Res Ctr, Nairobi, Kenya
[8] Southern Cross Univ, Fac Hlth, Natl Ctr Naturopath Med, Lismore, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Murcia, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Div Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Murcia, Spain
[10] Parc Sanit St Joan De Deu, Res & Dev Unit, Dr Antoni Pujadas,42 St Boi De Llobregat, Barcelona 08830, Spain
[11] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Ctr Hlth Performance & Wellbeing, Cambridge, England
[12] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Med, Med Sci Res Inst, Ctr Digital Hlth,Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[13] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Pediat, Coll Med, 23 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul 02447, South Korea
来源:
基金:
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词:
Ultrasonic therapy;
Knee osteoarthritis;
Systematic review;
Meta;
-analysis;
Physical therapy;
INTENSITY PULSED ULTRASOUND;
MANAGEMENT;
PAIN;
BLIND;
EFFICACY;
OUTCOMES;
INSTRUMENT;
SCALES;
REPAIR;
WOMAC;
D O I:
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30874
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Background: Therapeutic ultrasound (US) is a treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), but its efficacy and safety are unclear. The objective of this study is to quantify the effect of US on pain relief and function recovery in KOA, and to analyze the US treatment duration and parameters on treatment outcome. Methods: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to April 7, 2023. RCTs that compared the efficacy of therapeutic US with the control in KOA were included in the study, and the methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Twenty-one RCTs (1315 patients) were included. US had a positive effect on visual analog scale (VAS) (SMD = -0.64, 95 % CI [-0.88, -0.40], I2 = 71 %) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) total scale (SMD = -0.45, 95 % CI [-0.69, -0.20]; I2 = 67 %). Pulsed US with an intensity <= 2.5 W/cm2 reduced visual analog scale (VAS), and differed in sessions (24 sessions (SMD = -0.80, 95 % CI [-1.07, -0.53], I2 = 0 %) vs 10 sessions (SMD = -0.71, 95 % CI [-1.09, -0.33], I2 = 68 %)). For pulsed US, a duration of treatment of 4-8 weeks (SMD = -0.69, 95 % CI [-1.13, -0.25], I2 = 73 %) appeared to be superior to <= 4 weeks (SMD = -0.77, 95 % CI [-1.04, -0.49], I2 = 0 %) for reducing visual analog scale (VAS). No US treatmentrelated adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Therapeutic US may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with KOA. The mode, intensity, frequency, and duration of US may affect the effectiveness of pain relief. Pulsed US with an intensity <= 2.5 W/cm2, 24 sessions, and a treatment duration of <= 4 weeks appears to have better pain relief.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文