Tibial and femoral articular cartilage exhibit opposite outcomes for T1 p and T2*relaxation times in response to acute compressive loading in healthy knees

被引:1
|
作者
Ramsdell, John C. [1 ]
Beynnon, Bruce D. [1 ,2 ]
Borah, Andrew S. [2 ]
Gardner-Morse, Mack G. [2 ]
Zhang, Jiming [3 ]
Krug, Mickey I.
Tourville, Timothy W. [2 ,4 ]
Geeslin, Matthew [5 ]
Failla, Mathew J. [2 ,4 ]
Desarno, Michael [6 ]
Fiorentino, Niccolo M. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Elect & Biomed Engn, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Radiol Oncol & Med Phys, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Rehabil & Movement Sci, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Dept Radiol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[6] Univ Vermont, Biomed Stat Res Core, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[7] Univ Vermont, Dept Mech Engn, 33 Colchester Ave,Votey Hall, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
T1rho; T2star; MR-compatible; qMRI; Knee cartilage; T-2; RELAXATION-TIMES; FLUID-FLOW; OSTEOARTHRITIS; RECONSTRUCTION; DEGENERATION; T1RHO; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112133
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Abnormal loading is thought to play a key role in the disease progression of cartilage, but our understanding of how cartilage compositional measurements respond to acute compressive loading in-vivo is limited. Ten healthy subjects were scanned at two timepoints (7 +/- 3 days apart) with a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Scanning sessions included T1p and T2* acquisitions of each knee in two conditions: unloaded (traditional MRI setup) and loaded in compression at 40 % bodyweight as applied by an MRI-compatible loading device. T1p and T2* parameters were quantified for contacting cartilage (tibial and femoral) and non-contacting cartilage (posterior femoral condyle) regions. Significant effects of load were found in contacting regions for both T1p and T2*. The effect of load (loaded minus unloaded) in femoral contacting regions ranged from 4.1 to 6.9 ms for T1p, and 3.5 to 13.7 ms for T2*, whereas tibial contacting regions ranged from -5.6 to -1.7 ms for T1p, and -2.1 to 0.7 ms for T2*. Notably, the responses to load in the femoral and tibial cartilage revealed opposite effects. No significant differences were found in response to load between the two visits. This is the first study that analyzed the effects of acute loading on T1p and T2* measurements in human femoral and tibial cartilage separately. The results suggest the effect of acute compressive loading on T1p and T2* was: 1) opposite in the femoral and tibial cartilage; 2) larger in contacting regions than in non-contacting regions of the femoral cartilage; and 3) not different visit-to-visit.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cartilage T1ρ and T2 Relaxation Times in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Radiographic Hip Osteoarthritis
    Wyatt, Cory
    Kumar, Deepak
    Subburaj, Karupppasamy
    Lee, Sonia
    Nardo, Lorenzo
    Narayanan, Divya
    Lansdown, Drew
    Vail, Thomas
    Link, Thomas M.
    Souza, Richard B.
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) : 1548 - 1556
  • [22] T1ρ and T2 mapping reveal the in vivo extracellular matrix of articular cartilage
    Nishioka, Hiroaki
    Hirose, Jun
    Nakamura, Eiichi
    Oniki, Yasunari
    Takada, Koji
    Yamashita, Yasuyuki
    Mizuta, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 35 (01) : 147 - 155
  • [23] T1ρ relaxation time of the meniscus and its relationship with T1ρ of adjacent cartilage in knees with acute ACL injuries at 3 T
    Bolbos, R. I.
    Link, T. M.
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    Majumdar, S.
    Li, X.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [24] Influence of Physical Activity on T1 and T2*Relaxation Times of Healthy Achilles Tendons at 3T
    Grosse, Ulrich
    Springer, Fabian
    Hein, Tobias
    Groezinger, Gerd
    Schabel, Christoph
    Martirosian, Petros
    Schick, Fritz
    Syha, Roland
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 41 (01) : 193 - 201
  • [25] NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RELAXATION TIMES T1 AND T2 IN SOME LIQUIDS
    BONERA, G
    CHIODI, L
    LANZI, G
    RIGAMONTI, A
    NUOVO CIMENTO, 1960, 17 (02): : 198 - 204
  • [26] T1ρ and T2 relaxation times predict progression of knee osteoarthritis
    Prasad, A. P.
    Nardo, L.
    Schooler, J.
    Joseph, G. B.
    Link, T. M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [27] Effectively Measuring Exercise-Related Variations in T1ρ andT2Relaxation Times of Healthy Articular Cartilage
    Kessler, Dimitri A.
    MacKay, James W.
    McDonald, Scott
    McDonnell, Stephen
    Grainger, Andrew J.
    Roberts, Alexandra R.
    Janiczek, Robert L.
    Graves, Martin J.
    Kaggie, Joshua D.
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (06) : 1753 - 1764
  • [28] T1ρ and T2 relaxation times are associated with progression of hip osteoarthritis
    Gallo, M. C.
    Wyatt, C.
    Pedoia, V.
    Kumar, D.
    Lee, S.
    Nardo, L.
    Link, T. M.
    Souza, R. B.
    Majumdar, S.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2016, 24 (08) : 1399 - 1407
  • [29] Simultaneous determination of metabolite concentrations, T1 and T2 relaxation times
    An, Li
    Li, Shizhe
    Shen, Jun
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2017, 78 (06) : 2072 - 2081
  • [30] RELAXATION-TIMES T1 AND T2 OF WATER PROTON FOR SALIVAS
    LISSAC, M
    COUDERT, JL
    TEYSSIER, R
    BEJAT, C
    MAGNIN, P
    PEYRIN, JO
    BENE, GJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 68 (04) : 637 - 637