Recursive two-stage evaluation model for dynamic decision making under ambiguity

被引:0
|
作者
He, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Business & Management, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
关键词
Ambiguity aversion; Small domains; Source dependent; Bayes' updating; Dynamic programming; SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES; HOME BIAS; UTILITY; RISK; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.103022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, the two-stage-evaluation (TSE) model for decision making under ambiguity (He 2021) is extended to intertemporal setting in an axiomatic approach. The first set of axioms employed are commonly adopted for dynamic non-expected utility models in the literature. Besides these regular axioms, I also assume dynamic consistency and conditions which deliver a static TSE for consumption plans only pay non-zero consequences for one period. It is shown that these axioms hold if and only if these exists a recursively defined evaluation utility model representing decision maker (DM)'s preferences over consumption plans conditional on arriving at any node in an event tree. Such a recursive form implies that one can apply dynamic programming technique (rolling back the decision tree) to solve a dynamic decision making problem under TSE model. It can be shown that the solution for the recursively defined dynamic TSE model exists uniquely. Due to the "small domain" setup, the agent is short-sighted in the sense that they only process subjective probabilities over events defined on one period uncertainty over next period states, which differs from "far-sighted" assumption in most extant models that assume subjective probabilities exist over events defined on multiple periods. It is shown that under some extra conditions, our DM applies Bayes' rule "updating' her subjective beliefs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A TWO-STAGE DECISION-MAKING MODEL of ONLINE CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: PERSPECTIVE of IMAGE THEORY
    Yan Jin
    Fu Chen
    Miao Lingling
    IEEC 2009: FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 428 - +
  • [32] A two-stage consensus reaching model for group decision making with reciprocal fuzzy preference relations
    Yejun Xu
    Nannan Wu
    Soft Computing, 2019, 23 : 8057 - 8073
  • [33] A two-stage consensus reaching model for group decision making with reciprocal fuzzy preference relations
    Xu, Yejun
    Wu, Nannan
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (17) : 8057 - 8073
  • [34] A Two-Stage Investment Decision-Making Model for Urban Rail Transit Drainage Renovation
    Wang, Tao
    Liu, Bingsheng
    Liu, Shimeng
    Zhang, Kuan
    Ma, Mingyue
    SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (06):
  • [35] Secure software design evaluation and decision making model for ubiquitous computing: A two-stage ANN-Fuzzy AHP approach
    Alzahrani, Abdulrahman
    Khan, Rafiq Ahmad
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2024, 153
  • [36] Two-stage Evaluation Method of Dynamic Network DEA
    Liu, Jianyong
    Pang, Kun
    Li, Ling
    Fu, Chengqun
    Guo, Jie
    ADVANCED RESEARCH ON INDUSTRY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-7, 2011, 204-210 : 583 - 588
  • [37] Locally Constrained Decision Making via Two-Stage Distributed Simplex
    Buerger, Mathias
    Notarstefano, Giuseppe
    Allgoewer, Frank
    2011 50TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL AND EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC-ECC), 2011, : 5911 - 5916
  • [38] Linguistic assessments and rankings in two-stage group decision making procedures
    García-Lapresta, JL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2003, : 143 - 146
  • [39] Further exploration of two-stage decision making in the Monty Hall dilemma
    Granberg, D
    Dorr, N
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 111 (04): : 561 - 579
  • [40] Process graph approach for two-stage decision making: Transportation contracts
    Konig, Eva
    Bertok, Botond
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 121 : 1 - 11