Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction

被引:0
|
作者
Khan, Adam Z. [1 ]
Vaughan, Alayna K. [2 ]
Aman, Zachary S. [2 ]
Lazarus, Mark D. [2 ]
Williams, Gerald R. [2 ]
Namdari, Surena [2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, 13652 Cantara St,Bldg 2, Panorama City, CA 91402 USA
[2] Rothman Orthopaed, 925 Chestnut St,5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
shoulder; rotator cuff; patient-reported outcomes; patient satisfaction; SIMPLE SHOULDER TEST; ASSESSMENT NUMERIC EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; AMERICAN SHOULDER; ELBOW SURGEONS; SCORES; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13092550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) serve as metrics to gauge orthopedic treatment efficacy based on anchoring questions that do not account for a patient's satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This study evaluates if reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS values for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Alpha Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) correlates with overall patient satisfaction. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent RCR from 2015 to 2019. Pre-operative and 2 year postoperative ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS scores were recorded. Patients underwent a survey to assess: (1) what is your overall satisfaction with your surgical outcome? (scale 1 to 10); (2) if you could go back in time, would you undergo this operation again? (yes/no); (3) for the same condition, would you recommend this operation to a friend or family member? (yes/no). Spearman correlation coefficients were run to assess relationship between reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS and satisfaction. Results: Ninety-two patients were included. Mean preoperative ASES was 51.1 +/- 16.9, SANE was 43.3 +/- 20.9, SST was 5.4 +/- 2.9, and VAS was 4.6 +/- 2.1. Mean 2 year ASES was 83.9 +/- 18.5, SANE was 81.7 +/- 27.0, SST was 9.8 +/- 3.2, and VAS was 1.4 +/- 1.9. Mean patient satisfaction was 9.0 +/- 1.9; 89 (96.7%) patients would undergo surgery again and recommend surgery. Correlation for reaching PASS for SANE and satisfaction was moderate. Correlation coefficients were very weak for all other outcome metrics. Conclusions: Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS in ASES, SANE, SST, or VAS following RCR did not correlate with a patient's overall satisfaction or willingness to undergo surgery again or recommend surgery. Further investigation into the statistical credibility and overall clinical value of MCID, SCB, and PASS is necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Several factors predict the achievement of the patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review
    Sun, Bryan
    Vivekanantha, Prushoth
    Khalik, Hassaan Abdel
    de Sa, Darren
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2024,
  • [22] An Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Usage in Hand Surgery
    Nielsen, Colby
    Merrell, Dallin
    Reichenbach, Rachel
    Mayolo, Patrick
    Qubain, Leeann
    Hustedt, Joshua W.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (12) : E5490
  • [23] Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) Applied to the SF-36 in Patients Who Underwent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Piergentili, Ilaria
    Lalli, Alberto
    Bandini, Benedetta
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [24] Resilience correlates with patient-reported outcome measures at a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Wilson, Charlie D.
    Villamaria, Luke J.
    Welling, Benjamin D.
    Hammonds, Kendall A. P.
    Robin, Brett N.
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023, 15 (4_SUPPL) : 81 - 86
  • [25] Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state
    Hao, Kevin A.
    Hones, Keegan M.
    O'Keefe, Daniel S.
    Saengchote, Supreeya A.
    Burns, Madison Q.
    Wright, Jonathan O.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Farmer, Kevin W.
    Struk, Aimee M.
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    King, Joseph J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (10) : e516 - e527
  • [26] Race and Socioeconomic Status Are Associated With Inferior Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Rotator Cuff Repair
    Ziedas, Alexander C.
    Castle, Joshua P.
    Abed, Varag
    Swantek, Alexander J.
    Rahman, Tahsin M.
    Chaides, Sarah
    Makhni, Eric C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (02): : 234 - 242
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement and Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Hand Surgeons
    Garcia, Brittany N.
    Tyser, Andrew
    Roca, Hernan
    Kazmers, Nikolas H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (15) : 756 - 765
  • [28] Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis
    Karmacharya, Paras
    Stull, Courtney
    Stephens-Shields, Alisa
    Husni, M. Elaine
    Scher, Jose
    Craig, Ethan
    Fitzsimmons, Robert
    Reddy, Soumya
    Magrey, Marina
    Ogdie, Alexis
    Walsh, Jessica
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 74 : 2034 - 2037
  • [29] New Directions for Improving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Clinical Care and Research
    Fernandes-Taylor, Sara
    Zhao, Jiwei
    Francis, David O. O.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 149 (03) : 276 - 277
  • [30] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
    Matthew G. Alben
    Dan Gordon
    Neil Gambhir
    Matthew T. Kim
    Paul V. Romeo
    Andrew S. Rokito
    Joseph D. Zuckerman
    Mandeep S. Virk
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 2602 - 2614