Reducing energy and carbon footprint through diversified rainfed cropping systems

被引:3
|
作者
Kantwa, Sita Ram [1 ]
Choudhary, Mukesh [1 ]
Agrawal, Rajiv Kumar [1 ]
Dixit, Anoop Kumar [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [2 ]
Chary, G. Ravindra [3 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Grassland & Fodder Res Inst, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] ICAR Indian Inst Farming Syst Res, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] ICAR Cent Res Inst Dryland Agr, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
Carbon footprint; Crop diversification; Cropping system; Energy budgeting; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; MITIGATION; STRATEGIES; ROTATION; FORAGE; CROPS; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100306
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Agriculture is the second largest contributor (20 %) to total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the world. There is a need to identify energy and carbon efficient cropping systems that reduce GHG emission and improve environmental quality. Using life cycle assessment (LCA), we evaluated the four cropping systems namely fallow - chickpea (F-C); Sesbania - mustard (Ses-M); blackgram - chickpea (B-C); sorghum + cowpea - mustard (S + C-M) cultivated during the 2018-2022 period. The energy use pattern and the input-output relationship were analysed. Three measures were utilized to quantify carbon footprints: CFa, which denotes emissions per unit area; CFb, indicating emissions per kilogram of yield; and CFe, representing emissions per unit of economic output. The result indicates that non-renewable sources of energy (diesel and fertilizer) contributed more than similar to 80 % of the total energy consumed in the different cropping systems. The total energy requirement was the highest for S + C-M (16,972 MJ ha(-1)), followed by Ses-M (14,365 MJ ha(-1)), B-C (11,132 MJ ha(-1)) and F-C (8679 MJ ha(-1)) cropping systems. The S + C-M cropping system also had the highest energy use efficiency (9.13) followed by F-C (6.03), B-C (5.41) and Ses-M (5.41). The fallow-chickpea cropping system had the lowest values of CFa, CFb, and CFe however, the highest carbon efficiency (10.7) and the carbon sustainability index (9.7) were computed in S + C-M cropping system. Our findings indicate that thoughtfully structured, varied crop systems that integrate legumes and forage crops have the potential to significantly reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions, while sustaining or potentially improving overall productivity within these systems.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reducing energy and carbon footprint in semi-arid irrigated cropping systems through crop diversification
    Bista, Dabit
    Sapkota, Sushil
    Acharya, Pramod
    Acharya, Ram
    Ghimire, Rajan
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [2] Reducing agricultural carbon footprint through diversified crop rotation systems in the North China Plain
    Yang, Xiaolin
    Gao, Wangsheng
    Zhang, Min
    Chen, Yuanquan
    Sui, Peng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 76 : 131 - 139
  • [3] Diversified cropping systems for reducing soil erosion and nutrient loss and for increasing crop productivity and profitability in rainfed environments
    Kumari, V. Visha
    Balloli, S. S.
    Kumar, Manoranjan
    Ramana, D. B. V.
    Prabhakar, M.
    Osman, M.
    Indoria, A. K.
    Manjunath, M.
    Maruthi, V.
    Chary, G. Ravindra
    Chandran, M. A. Sarath
    Gopinath, K. A.
    Venkatesh, G.
    Rao, M. S.
    Singh, V. K.
    Timsina, J.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 217
  • [4] Enhancing economic water productivity under on farm reservoirs in diversified rainfed cropping systems
    Reddy, K. S.
    Maruthi, V.
    Kumar, M.
    Pankaj, P. K.
    Reddy, A. G. K.
    Umesha, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2017, 11 (01) : 193 - 207
  • [5] Reducing the carbon footprint of the Hyannis WPCF through renewable energy production and energy efficiency
    Drainville, Marc
    Rudenko, Anastasia
    Saad, Dale
    Doyle, Peter S.
    1600, New England Water Environment Association (48): : 22 - 27
  • [6] A Cluster Analysis on the Energy Use Indicators and Carbon Footprint of Irrigated Wheat Cropping Systems
    Rafiee, Hamed
    Aminizadeh, Milad
    Hosseini, Elham Mehrparvar
    Aghasafari, Hanane
    Mohammadi, Ali
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [7] Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of different wheat-rice cropping systems in China
    Du, Xiangbei
    Xi, Min
    Kong, Lingcong
    Chen, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Ligan
    Zhang, Hongcheng
    Dai, Qigen
    Wu, Wenge
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 879
  • [8] Reducing the Carbon Footprint: Aluminium Smelting with Changing Energy Systems and the Risk of Carbon Leakage
    Saevarsdottir, Gudrun
    Kvande, Halvor
    Welch, Barry J.
    LIGHT METALS 2020, 2020, : 726 - 734
  • [9] Reducing carbon footprint in ports through electrification and flexible energy management of ships
    Barone, Giovanni
    Buonomano, Annamaria
    Del Papa, Gianluca
    Giuzio, Giovanni Francesco
    Palombo, Adolfo
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 332
  • [10] Energy Audit in Farming Reducing carbon footprint
    Shakthi, A. Siva
    Shrivastava, Neeta
    Manjari, K. Sri
    Nayak, Pavithra P.
    Baskar, R.
    Lakshman, Kshama
    Baskar, Sushmitha
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2019, 116 (10): : 1621 - 1621