Reducing energy and carbon footprint in semi-arid irrigated cropping systems through crop diversification

被引:2
|
作者
Bista, Dabit [1 ]
Sapkota, Sushil [1 ]
Acharya, Pramod [2 ]
Acharya, Ram [1 ]
Ghimire, Rajan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agr Business, Las Cruces, NM USA
[2] New Mexico State Univ, Agr Sci Ctr, Clovis, NM USA
[3] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, Las Cruces, NM USA
关键词
Net energy efficiency; Carbon footprint; Cover cropping; Cost-benefit ratio; Carbon credit; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; COVER CROPS; USE EFFICIENCY; CORN-SILAGE; SOIL; TILLAGE; NITROGEN; CONSERVATION; MITIGATION; ROTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27904
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Energy and carbon (C) footprints of agricultural production practices have garnered high attention due to rising energy costs and increasing global warming. However, the contribution of conservation and regenerative farming practices, including cover cropping, on energy and C footprints have not yet been documented for cropping systems in arid and semi -arid regions. This study evaluated the energy and C footprint of cover crop integrated silage maize ( Zea mays L.) and sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) production systems in the semi -arid region of the southwestern US. The treatments were mixtures of winter cover crops: i) grasses and legumes (GL), ii) grasses, brassicas, and legumes (GBL), iii) grasses and brassicas (GB), and iv) no cover crops (NCC) control for each crop production system. Results showed cover crops had 24.1 - 24.5% greater energy input than NCC. In silage maize rotation, energy output was 17 - 22% greater in GBL and GL than in NCC. In silage sorghum rotation, the energy output was 15 - 24% greater in all cover crops than in NCC. The resulting net energy was 16 - 21% greater in GBL and GL than in NCC under silage maize, while it was 18 - 24% greater in GBL and GB than in NCC under silage sorghum. In the silage maize system, the C-footprint per kg yield was not different among treatments, whereas in silage sorghum, it was 58% greater in GBL than in NCC. The benefit-to-cost ratio was greater than one for all treatments, but the additional revenue through C credit programs could make cover cropping a more feasible and beneficial approach, improving economic and environmental sustainability while producing silage crops. While the C footprint was crop rotation specific, cover cropping should be encouraged over crop-fallow systems to producers in semi -arid environments to reduce energy usage and increase C-credit benefits. Clear national and state policy on the C credit program will also enhance economic and environmental benefits by adopting cover cropping and other regenerative farming practices.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics in Semi-Arid Irrigated Cropping Systems
    Bierer, Andrew M.
    Leytem, April B.
    Dungan, Robert S.
    Moore, Amber D.
    Bjorneberg, David L.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [2] Cover crop-mediated soil carbon storage and soil health in semi-arid irrigated cropping systems
    Acharya, Pramod
    Ghimire, Rajan
    Acosta-Martinez, Veronica
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 361
  • [3] Reducing energy and carbon footprint through diversified rainfed cropping systems
    Kantwa, Sita Ram
    Choudhary, Mukesh
    Agrawal, Rajiv Kumar
    Dixit, Anoop Kumar
    Kumar, Sunil
    Chary, G. Ravindra
    ENERGY NEXUS, 2024, 14
  • [4] Net greenhouse gas balance with cover crops in semi-arid irrigated cropping systems
    Acharya, Pramod
    Ghimire, Rajan
    Paye, Wooiklee S.
    Ganguli, Amy C.
    DelGrosso, Stephen J.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [5] Net greenhouse gas balance with cover crops in semi-arid irrigated cropping systems
    Pramod Acharya
    Rajan Ghimire
    Wooiklee S. Paye
    Amy C. Ganguli
    Stephen J. DelGrosso
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [6] Carbon Footprint Assessment and Energy Budgeting of Different Annual and Perennial Forage Cropping Systems: A Study from the Semi-Arid Region of Karnataka, India
    Manoj, Konapura Nagaraja
    Shekara, Bommalapura Gundanaik
    Sridhara, Shankarappa
    Mudalagiriyappa
    Chikkarugi, Nagesh Malasiddappa
    Gopakkali, Pradeep
    Jha, Prakash Kumar
    Prasad, P. V. Vara
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [7] Water requirement and crop coefficient of irrigated sugarcane in a semi-arid region
    da Silva, Thieres G. F.
    de Moura, Magna S. B.
    Zolnier, Sergio
    Soares, Jose M.
    Vieira, Vinicius J. de S.
    Junior, Walter G. F.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2012, 16 (01): : 64 - 71
  • [8] A Cluster Analysis on the Energy Use Indicators and Carbon Footprint of Irrigated Wheat Cropping Systems
    Rafiee, Hamed
    Aminizadeh, Milad
    Hosseini, Elham Mehrparvar
    Aghasafari, Hanane
    Mohammadi, Ali
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [9] Contributions of individual cover crop species to rainfed maize production in semi-arid cropping systems
    Rosa, Alexandre T.
    Creech, Cody F.
    Elmore, Roger W.
    Rudnick, Daran R.
    Lindquist, John L.
    Butts, Liberty
    de Faria, Italo K. Pinho
    Werle, Rodrigo
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2021, 271
  • [10] Influence of Tillage and Cropping Systems on Soil Properties and Crop Performance under Semi-Arid Conditions
    Boudiar, Ridha
    Alshallash, Khalid S.
    Alharbi, Khadiga
    Okasha, Salah A.
    Fenni, Mohammed
    Mekhlouf, Abdelhamid
    Fortas, Bilal
    Hamsi, Keirieddine
    Nadjem, Kamel
    Belagrouz, Abdennour
    Mansour, Elsayed
    Mekhlouf, Mahfoud
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)