Navigating Institutional Plurality: Organizational Governance in Hybrid Organizations

被引:295
|
作者
Mair, Johanna [1 ]
Mayer, Judith [2 ]
Lutz, Eva [3 ]
机构
[1] Hertie Sch Governance, Management Org & Leadership, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
governance; hybrid organization; institutional logic; institutional plurality; mechanism; social enterprises; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; NONPROFIT BOARDS; AGENCY THEORY; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; DIRECTORS; ACCOUNTABILITY; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES; RESPONSES; BOUNDARY;
D O I
10.1177/0170840615580007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Hybrid organizations operate in a context of institutional plurality and enact elements of multiple, often conflicting institutional logics. Governance is highly relevant in navigating such an environment. This study examines how hybrid organizations set up their governance structures and practices. Building on survey data from 70 social enterprises, a subset of hybrid organizations, we identify two types of hybrid organization: conforming hybrids rely on the prioritization of a single institutional logic and dissenting hybrids use defiance, selective coupling and innovation as mechanisms to combine and balance the prescriptions of several institutional logics. We illustrate these mechanisms by drawing on the qualitative analysis of selected cases. This study refines current debates on social enterprises as hybrid organizations. Based on our findings, we speculate that some social enterprises might assume hybridity for symbolic reasons while others - genuine hybrids - do so for substantive reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 739
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability of farmer organizations in Uganda: the role of organizational and institutional factors
    Nangobi, Racheal
    Mshenga, Patience Mlongo
    Mugonola, Basil
    DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [22] Organizational Settlements: Theorizing How Organizations Respond to Institutional Complexity
    Schildt, Henri
    Perkmann, Markus
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, 2017, 26 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [23] Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity.
    Gaston, Noel
    ASIAN STUDIES REVIEW, 2009, 33 (04): : 543 - 546
  • [24] Navigating Tensions in the Organizational Change Process towards Hybrid Workspace
    Hasbi, Marie M.
    van Marrewijk, Alfons
    JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24 (04) : 275 - 300
  • [25] Governance and accountability in hybrid organizations - past, present and future
    Vakkuri, Jarmo
    Johanson, Jan-Erik
    Feng, Nancy Chun
    Giordano, Filippo
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC BUDGETING ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 33 (03) : 245 - 260
  • [26] Debate: Taming the monster understanding hybrid organizations and governance
    Vakkuri, Jarmo
    Johanson, Jan-Erik
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (03) : 162 - 163
  • [27] Contemporary Water Governance: Navigating Crisis Response and Institutional Constraints through Pragmatism
    Baird, Julia
    Plummer, Ryan
    Bullock, Ryan
    Dupont, Diane
    Heinmiller, Tim
    Jollineau, Marilyne
    Kubik, Wendee
    Renzetti, Steven
    Vasseur, Liette
    WATER, 2016, 8 (06)
  • [28] Resourcing International Organizations: Resource Diversification, Organizational Differentiation, and Administrative Governance
    Goetz, Klaus H.
    Patz, Ronny
    GLOBAL POLICY, 2017, 8 : 5 - 14
  • [29] Organizational enablers for project governance and govemmentality in project-based organizations
    Muller, Ralf
    Pemsel, Sofia
    Shao, Jingting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (04) : 839 - 851
  • [30] Boundary organizations and environmental governance: Performance, institutional design, and conceptual development
    Gustafsson, Karin M.
    Lidskog, Rolf
    CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 19 : 1 - 11