Lorenz Zonoids for Trustworthy AI

被引:0
|
作者
Giudici, Paolo [1 ]
Raffinetti, Emanuela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Dept Econ & Management, Via San Felice Monastero 5, Pavia, Italy
关键词
Artificial Intelligence methods; Lorenz Zonoids tools; SAFE approach;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-44064-9_27
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Machine learning models are boosting Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in many domains, such as finance, health care and automotive. This is mainly due to their advantage, in terms of predictive accuracy, with respect to "classic" statistical learning models. However, although complex machine learning models may reach high predictive performance, their predictions are not explainable and have an intrinsic black-box nature. Accuracy and explainability are not the only desirable characteristics of a machine learning model. The recently proposed European regulation on Artificial Intelligence, the AI Act, attempts to regulate the use of AI by means of a set of requirements of trustworthiness for high risk applications, to be embedded in a risk management model. We propose to map the requirements established for high-risk applications in the AI Act in four main variables: Sustainability, Accuracy, Fairness and Explainability, which need a set of metrics that can establish not only whether but also how much the requirements are satisfied over time. To the best of our knowledge, there exists no such set of metrics, yet. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap, and propose a set of four integrated metrics, aimed at measuring Sustainability, Accuracy, Fairness and Explainability (S.A.F.E. in brief), which have the advantage, with respect to the available metrics, of being all based on one unifying statistical tool: the Lorenz curve. The Lorenz curve is a well known robust statistical tool, which has been employed, along with the related Gini index to measure income and wealth inequalities. It thus appears as a natural methodology on which to build an integrated set of trustworthy AI measurement metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 530
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trustworthy AI algorithm for embryo ranking
    Deluga-Bialowarczuk, S.
    Wygocki, P.
    Pawlik, P.
    Kompanowski, H.
    Gilewicz, T.
    Siennicki, M.
    Sankowski, P.
    Milewski, R.
    Stankiewicz, B.
    Martynowicz, I.
    Sieczynski, P.
    Kuczynski, W.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [42] Discrimination, Bias, Fairness, and Trustworthy AI
    Varona, Daniel
    Suarez, Juan Luis
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [43] Trustworthy AI for Digital Engineering Transformation
    Huang, Jingwei
    Beling, Peter
    Freeman, Laura
    Zeng, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED DESIGN & PROCESS SCIENCE, 2021, 25 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [44] Developing trustworthy AI for weather and climate
    Mcgovern, Amy
    Tissot, Philippe
    Bostrom, Ann
    [J]. PHYSICS TODAY, 2024, 77 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [45] Trustworthy human-AI partnerships
    Ramchurn, Sarvapali D.
    Stein, Sebastian
    Jennings, Nicholas R.
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2021, 24 (08)
  • [46] Towards Trustworthy AI for Autonomous Systems
    Bride, Hadrien
    Dong, Jin Song
    Hou, Zhe
    Mahony, Brendan
    Oxenham, Martin
    [J]. FORMAL METHODS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, ICFEM 2018, 2018, 11232 : 407 - 411
  • [47] A Leap of Faith: Is There a Formula for "Trustworthy" AI?
    Braun, Matthias
    Bleher, Hannah
    Hummel, Patrik
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2021, 51 (03) : 17 - 22
  • [48] Explainable Machine Learning for Trustworthy AI
    Giannotti, Fosca
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 356 : 3 - 3
  • [49] Advances in Explainable, Fair, and Trustworthy AI
    Islam, Sheikh Rabiul
    Russell, Ingrid
    Eberle, William
    Talbert, Douglas
    Hasan, Md Golam Moula Mehedi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2024, 33 (03)
  • [50] Ethical funding for trustworthy AI: proposals to address the responsibilities of funders to ensure that projects adhere to trustworthy AI practice
    Allison Gardner
    Adam Leon Smith
    Adam Steventon
    Ellen Coughlan
    Marie Oldfield
    [J]. AI and Ethics, 2022, 2 (2): : 277 - 291