The complexity of the APP competition model with bounded rationality in platform ecosystem

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao, Jianli [1 ]
Xiao, Hanli [2 ]
Li, Changrong [3 ]
机构
[1] Yiwu Ind & Commercial Coll, Sch Econ & Management, Yiwu 322000, Peoples R China
[2] Qiannan Normal Univ Nationalities, Sch Tourism & Resources Environm, Duyun 55900, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330000, Peoples R China
关键词
Platform ecosystem; Chaos theory; Two-sided market; Bifurcation; CHAOS THEORY; DYNAMICS; GAME; INNOVATION; STABILITY; STRATEGY; DUOPOLY;
D O I
10.1007/s10660-024-09868-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Internet platform encompasses an array of software components, including mobile operating systems, transportation services, and social media networks, which synergistically form the foundation of the platform ecosystem. In this study, we have created a dynamic model that explores the competition between in-house applications (IHA) and third-party applications (TPA) within the platform ecosystem, which includes a single platform and APP developer. By utilizing simulation techniques on the dynamic model, we have identified notable factors that impact the stability of the APP competition system, including: the adjustment speed of IHA, APP heterogeneity, and TPA fees. Our findings are as follows: (1) A higher adjustment speed of IHA leads to increased system instability, resulting in a chaotic state and reduced profitability for both IHA and TPA. (2) We discovered that APP competition systems with either high or low APP heterogeneity are more prone to instability. (3) In relation to TPA fees, higher fees tend to foster greater instability within the platform ecosystem, while also increasing IHA profits. (4) We incorporate the time-delayed feedback control(TDFC) method to regulate intricate phenomena. In periods of instability, the utilization of the TDFC method can significantly mitigate the instability.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE COMPLEXITY OF RESOURCE-ALLOCATION AND PRICE MECHANISMS UNDER BOUNDED RATIONALITY
    FRIEDMAN, EJ
    OREN, SS
    [J]. ECONOMIC THEORY, 1995, 6 (02) : 225 - 250
  • [22] A memory-based model of bounded rationality
    Mullainathan, S
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (03): : 735 - 774
  • [23] Addiction beyond pharmacological effects: The role of environment complexity and bounded rationality
    Ognibene, Dimitri
    Fiore, Vincenzo G.
    Gu, Xiaosi
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2019, 116 : 269 - 278
  • [24] Dynamics of Hotelling triopoly model with bounded rationality
    Peng, Yu
    Lu, Qian
    Wu, Xue
    Zhao, Yueru
    Xiao, Yue
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 373
  • [25] THE GARBLING DECISION MAKER - A MODEL OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY
    PAPADOPOULOS, NM
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1980, 25 (03) : 577 - 579
  • [26] A SPARSITY-BASED MODEL OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY
    Gabaix, Xavier
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2014, 129 (04): : 1661 - 1710
  • [27] Learning by helping: a bounded rationality model of mentoring
    Arai, M
    Billot, A
    Lanfranchi, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2001, 45 (02) : 113 - 131
  • [28] A Misfit model: irrational deterrence and bounded rationality
    Karl Sörenson
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2023, 94 : 575 - 591
  • [29] A Misfit model: irrational deterrence and bounded rationality
    Sorenson, Karl
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2023, 94 (04) : 575 - 591
  • [30] The Stochastic Satisficing model: A bounded rationality discrete choice model
    Gonzalez-Valdes, Felipe
    de Dios Ortuzar, Juan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2018, 27 : 74 - 87