The complexity of the APP competition model with bounded rationality in platform ecosystem

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao, Jianli [1 ]
Xiao, Hanli [2 ]
Li, Changrong [3 ]
机构
[1] Yiwu Ind & Commercial Coll, Sch Econ & Management, Yiwu 322000, Peoples R China
[2] Qiannan Normal Univ Nationalities, Sch Tourism & Resources Environm, Duyun 55900, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330000, Peoples R China
关键词
Platform ecosystem; Chaos theory; Two-sided market; Bifurcation; CHAOS THEORY; DYNAMICS; GAME; INNOVATION; STABILITY; STRATEGY; DUOPOLY;
D O I
10.1007/s10660-024-09868-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Internet platform encompasses an array of software components, including mobile operating systems, transportation services, and social media networks, which synergistically form the foundation of the platform ecosystem. In this study, we have created a dynamic model that explores the competition between in-house applications (IHA) and third-party applications (TPA) within the platform ecosystem, which includes a single platform and APP developer. By utilizing simulation techniques on the dynamic model, we have identified notable factors that impact the stability of the APP competition system, including: the adjustment speed of IHA, APP heterogeneity, and TPA fees. Our findings are as follows: (1) A higher adjustment speed of IHA leads to increased system instability, resulting in a chaotic state and reduced profitability for both IHA and TPA. (2) We discovered that APP competition systems with either high or low APP heterogeneity are more prone to instability. (3) In relation to TPA fees, higher fees tend to foster greater instability within the platform ecosystem, while also increasing IHA profits. (4) We incorporate the time-delayed feedback control(TDFC) method to regulate intricate phenomena. In periods of instability, the utilization of the TDFC method can significantly mitigate the instability.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complexity of the Hotelling model with bounded rationality rules
    Zhang, Zhi-Yuan
    Yu, Wei-Sheng
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2015, 35 (04): : 920 - 927
  • [2] Production competition and complexity analysis between bounded rationality creative enterprises
    Kong, Lingzhu
    Zhang, Yue
    Hao, Junhao
    Yu, Weisheng
    [J]. Yu, Weisheng (376128972@qq.com), 2020, Totem Publishers Ltd (16) : 599 - 608
  • [3] Monopolistic competition and bounded rationality
    Jin, JY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2001, 45 (02) : 175 - 184
  • [4] Competition analysis of a triopoly game with bounded rationality
    Elsadany, A. A.
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2012, 45 (11) : 1343 - 1348
  • [5] BOUNDED RATIONALITY AND THE EMERGENCE OF SIMPLICITY AMIDST COMPLEXITY
    Lee, Cassey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2011, 25 (03) : 507 - 526
  • [6] Spatial competition and bounded rationality: Retailing at the edge of chaos
    Krider, RE
    Weinberg, CB
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1997, 29 (01) : 16 - 34
  • [7] Oligopolistic quantity competition with bounded rationality and social comparison
    Li, Yan
    Chen, Yefen
    Shou, Biying
    Zhao, Xiaobo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 211 : 180 - 196
  • [8] BOUNDED RATIONALITY, HEURISTICS, COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Bettis, Richard A.
    Hu, Songcui
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL STRATEGY IN PERSPECTIVE, 2018, 39 : 139 - 150
  • [9] The dynamics of Bertrand model with bounded rationality
    Zhang, Jixiang
    Da, Qingli
    Wang, Yanhua
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2009, 39 (05) : 2048 - 2055
  • [10] An Evolutionary Model of Bounded Rationality and Intelligence
    Brennan, Thomas J.
    Lo, Andrew W.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):